Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Stern Lesson relevance 0.72 · 64.0% (208 of 325 decks)
- Mnemonic Sphere relevance 0.68 · 59.7% (194 of 325 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.71 · 54.8% (178 of 325 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.67 · 54.5% (177 of 325 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.65 · 56.6% (184 of 325 decks)
- Shardless Outlander relevance 0.83 · 27.1% (88 of 325 decks)
- Sojourner's Companion relevance 0.68 · 42.2% (137 of 325 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.69 · 37.2% (121 of 325 decks)
- Network Terminal relevance 0.72 · 24.3% (79 of 325 decks)
- Runaway Boulder relevance 0.76 · 17.8% (58 of 325 decks)
- Argivian Restoration relevance 0.63 · 36.0% (117 of 325 decks)
- Phyrexian Triniform relevance 0.66 · 32.0% (104 of 325 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 0.64 · 32.6% (106 of 325 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.60 · 38.5% (125 of 325 decks)
- Lumengrid Augur relevance 0.78 · 13.5% (44 of 325 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.58 · 40.9% (133 of 325 decks)
- Hollow One relevance 0.78 · 12.9% (42 of 325 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.64 · 29.5% (96 of 325 decks)
- Geology Enthusiast relevance 0.67 · 26.2% (85 of 325 decks)
- Soul of New Phyrexia relevance 0.63 · 28.6% (93 of 325 decks)
- Thran Spider relevance 0.69 · 19.4% (63 of 325 decks)
- Akal Pakal, First Among Equals relevance 0.63 · 25.5% (83 of 325 decks)
- Wreck Remover relevance 0.73 · 12.0% (39 of 325 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.50 · 46.2% (150 of 325 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.58 · 29.8% (97 of 325 decks)
- Trading Post relevance 0.57 · 30.8% (100 of 325 decks)
- Slagstone Refinery relevance 0.65 · 16.6% (54 of 325 decks)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.59 · 21.8% (71 of 325 decks)
- Splitting the Powerstone relevance 0.66 · 12.3% (40 of 325 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.45 · 46.5% (151 of 325 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.42 · 53.2% (173 of 325 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.51 · 33.5% (109 of 325 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 0.49 · 34.2% (111 of 325 decks)
- Metalwork Colossus relevance 0.51 · 31.1% (101 of 325 decks)
- Thought Courier relevance 0.54 · 25.5% (83 of 325 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.51 · 30.2% (98 of 325 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.55 · 20.3% (66 of 325 decks)
- Filigree Attendant relevance 0.53 · 22.8% (74 of 325 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.38 · 55.1% (179 of 325 decks)
- Daily Bugle Newspaper relevance 0.64 · 9.2% (30 of 325 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.53 · 21.2% (69 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.53 · 19.1% (62 of 325 decks)
- Stone Retrieval Unit relevance 0.64 · 8.3% (27 of 325 decks)
- Skybox Ferry relevance 0.66 · 7.4% (24 of 325 decks)
- Argentum Masticore relevance 0.62 · 9.5% (31 of 325 decks)
- Saiba Trespassers relevance 0.64 · 8.0% (26 of 325 decks)
- Jalum Tome relevance 0.62 · 9.2% (30 of 325 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.46 · 30.5% (99 of 325 decks)
- The Underworld Cookbook relevance 0.58 · 11.1% (36 of 325 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.43 · 33.5% (109 of 325 decks)
Card Stacks
25
Card Stacks
25Showing 1-2 of 25
Cards like Merfolk Looter
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Merfolk Looter 34%
- Thought Courier 26%
- Enclave Cryptologist 6%
- Bonded Fetch 3%
- Facet Reader 2%
- Dragonborn Looter 2%
- Cephalid Looter 2%
- Reckless Scholar 2%
- Magus of the Bazaar 2%
- Harrier Strix 2%
- Strix Lookout 1%
Other options: Captain of Umbar, Erratic Visionary, Selhoff Entomber, Seeker of Insight, Teferi's Protege, Krovikan Sorcerer, Cephalid Broker, Soothsayer Adept, Research Assistant, Pilfering Hawk, Frontline Sage, Furtive Analyst
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 46%
- Foundry Inspector 43%
- Cloud Key 11%
Other options: Helm of Awakening, Stone Calendar, Mana Matrix, Planar Gate
Cards like Bag of Holding
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Bag of Holding 37%
- Currency Converter 30%
Cards like Myr Retriever
6.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Myr Retriever 20%
- Spine of Ish Sah 14%
- Scrap Trawler 12%
- Workshop Assistant 9%
- Junk Diver 7%
Cards like Transplant Theorist
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Transplant Theorist 38%
- Rook Turret 21%
- Skyswimmer Koi 3%
Cards like Collector's Vault
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Phyrexian Triniform
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Shimmer Myr
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Shimmer Dragon
6.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Scour for Scrap
2.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other blue decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other blue decks
Cards
- Scour for Scrap 29%
- Fabricate 15%
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
4.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Tamiyo's Logbook
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Jayemdae Tome, Mysterious Tome // Chilling Chronicle, Fool's Tome, Scepter of Insight
Cards like Trading Post
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Unwinding Clock
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Filigree Attendant
20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Filigree Attendant 23%
- Broodstar 6%
Cards like Wayfarer's Bauble
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Armillary Sphere, Wanderer's Twig, Keys to the House, Braidwood Sextant, Renegade Map, Ominous Parcel
Cards like Thirst for Knowledge
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
54% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Thirst for Meaning
Cards like Network Terminal
5.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards like Thran Dynamo
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Ichor Elixir, Sceptre of Eternal Glory
Cards like Riddlesmith
2.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other blue decks
Cards
- Riddlesmith 34%
- Vedalken Archmage 5%
Cards like Mystic Forge
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Unctus, Grand Metatect
4.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Mnemonic Sphere
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards like Refute
2.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Refute 24%
- Failed Inspection 3%
Other options: Deny Entry, Unravel, School Daze, Dream Fracture, Vex
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.71 · 54.8% (178 of 325 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.65 · 56.6% (184 of 325 decks)
- Shardless Outlander relevance 0.83 · 27.1% (88 of 325 decks)
- Sojourner's Companion relevance 0.68 · 42.2% (137 of 325 decks)
- Phyrexian Triniform relevance 0.66 · 32.0% (104 of 325 decks)
- Transplant Theorist relevance 0.60 · 38.5% (125 of 325 decks)
- Lumengrid Augur relevance 0.78 · 13.5% (44 of 325 decks)
- Hollow One relevance 0.78 · 12.9% (42 of 325 decks)
- Geology Enthusiast relevance 0.67 · 26.2% (85 of 325 decks)
- Soul of New Phyrexia relevance 0.63 · 28.6% (93 of 325 decks)
- Thran Spider relevance 0.69 · 19.4% (63 of 325 decks)
- Akal Pakal, First Among Equals relevance 0.63 · 25.5% (83 of 325 decks)
- Wreck Remover relevance 0.73 · 12.0% (39 of 325 decks)
- Steel Hellkite relevance 0.51 · 33.5% (109 of 325 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 0.49 · 34.2% (111 of 325 decks)
- Metalwork Colossus relevance 0.51 · 31.1% (101 of 325 decks)
- Thought Courier relevance 0.54 · 25.5% (83 of 325 decks)
- Cityscape Leveler relevance 0.51 · 30.2% (98 of 325 decks)
- Filigree Attendant relevance 0.53 · 22.8% (74 of 325 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.38 · 55.1% (179 of 325 decks)
- Rook Turret relevance 0.53 · 21.2% (69 of 325 decks)
- Stone Retrieval Unit relevance 0.64 · 8.3% (27 of 325 decks)
- Argentum Masticore relevance 0.62 · 9.5% (31 of 325 decks)
- Saiba Trespassers relevance 0.64 · 8.0% (26 of 325 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.46 · 30.5% (99 of 325 decks)
- Riddlesmith relevance 0.43 · 33.5% (109 of 325 decks)
- Mechan Assembler relevance 0.51 · 16.9% (55 of 325 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.41 · 36.3% (118 of 325 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.30 · 65.2% (212 of 325 decks)
- Patchwork Gnomes relevance 0.62 · 5.2% (17 of 325 decks)
- Hulking Metamorph relevance 0.47 · 18.5% (60 of 325 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.31 · 57.5% (187 of 325 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.32 · 50.2% (163 of 325 decks)
- Threefold Thunderhulk relevance 0.44 · 16.6% (54 of 325 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.41 · 22.8% (74 of 325 decks)
- Triplicate Titan relevance 0.44 · 13.5% (44 of 325 decks)
- Colossus of Akros relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (25 of 325 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.37 · 26.2% (85 of 325 decks)
- Glint Raker relevance 0.54 · 4.6% (15 of 325 decks)
- Combat Courier relevance 0.44 · 11.1% (36 of 325 decks)
- Workshop Assistant relevance 0.46 · 9.2% (30 of 325 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.36 · 23.4% (76 of 325 decks)
- Myr Retriever relevance 0.36 · 20.3% (66 of 325 decks)
- Depth Charge Colossus relevance 0.52 · 4.3% (14 of 325 decks)
- Maelstrom Colossus relevance 0.47 · 5.8% (19 of 325 decks)
- Canoptek Tomb Sentinel relevance 0.53 · 4.0% (13 of 325 decks)
- Archaeomender relevance 0.46 · 6.5% (21 of 325 decks)
- Drafna, Founder of Lat-Nam relevance 0.39 · 12.6% (41 of 325 decks)
- Su-Chi Cave Guard relevance 0.48 · 4.6% (15 of 325 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.33 · 25.2% (82 of 325 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All artifacts (50)
- Mnemonic Sphere relevance 0.68 · 59.7% (194 of 325 decks)
- Collector's Vault relevance 0.67 · 54.5% (177 of 325 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 0.69 · 37.2% (121 of 325 decks)
- Network Terminal relevance 0.72 · 24.3% (79 of 325 decks)
- Runaway Boulder relevance 0.76 · 17.8% (58 of 325 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.58 · 40.9% (133 of 325 decks)
- Currency Converter relevance 0.64 · 29.5% (96 of 325 decks)
- Trading Post relevance 0.57 · 30.8% (100 of 325 decks)
- Slagstone Refinery relevance 0.65 · 16.6% (54 of 325 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.45 · 46.5% (151 of 325 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.55 · 20.3% (66 of 325 decks)
- Daily Bugle Newspaper relevance 0.64 · 9.2% (30 of 325 decks)
- Skybox Ferry relevance 0.66 · 7.4% (24 of 325 decks)
- Jalum Tome relevance 0.62 · 9.2% (30 of 325 decks)
- The Underworld Cookbook relevance 0.58 · 11.1% (36 of 325 decks)
- Smuggler's Copter relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (53 of 325 decks)
- Moonsnare Prototype relevance 0.45 · 28.0% (91 of 325 decks)
- Urn of Godfire relevance 0.58 · 7.7% (25 of 325 decks)
- Extinguisher Battleship relevance 0.49 · 13.8% (45 of 325 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.43 · 24.0% (78 of 325 decks)
- Tamiyo's Logbook relevance 0.46 · 15.7% (51 of 325 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 0.45 · 13.5% (44 of 325 decks)
- Braided Net // Braided Quipu relevance 0.51 · 8.3% (27 of 325 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 0.44 · 14.5% (47 of 325 decks)
- Energy Refractor relevance 0.50 · 8.3% (27 of 325 decks)
- Buried Treasure relevance 0.53 · 5.5% (18 of 325 decks)
- Mind's Eye relevance 0.43 · 14.5% (47 of 325 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.38 · 21.2% (69 of 325 decks)
- Mirrorworks relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (38 of 325 decks)
- Wondrous Crucible relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (32 of 325 decks)
- Shuri's Fabricator relevance 0.51 · 4.6% (15 of 325 decks)
- The Celestus relevance 0.49 · 4.9% (16 of 325 decks)
- Planar Bridge relevance 0.46 · 7.7% (25 of 325 decks)
- Unstable Obelisk relevance 0.47 · 6.5% (21 of 325 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.41 · 10.8% (35 of 325 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.43 · 8.3% (27 of 325 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (65 of 325 decks)
- Goblin Firebomb relevance 0.50 · 4.0% (13 of 325 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.37 · 12.3% (40 of 325 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (29 of 325 decks)
- God-Pharaoh's Gift relevance 0.46 · 4.3% (14 of 325 decks)
- Dino DNA relevance 0.46 · 4.3% (14 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Tome relevance 0.50 · 3.7% (12 of 325 decks)
- Zephyr Boots relevance 0.45 · 4.3% (14 of 325 decks)
- Pirate Hat relevance 0.46 · 3.7% (12 of 325 decks)
- Thrór's Map relevance 0.44 · 4.0% (13 of 325 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.27 · 27.1% (88 of 325 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.29 · 16.3% (53 of 325 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.29 · 15.1% (49 of 325 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.33 · 8.9% (29 of 325 decks)
Enchantments
21
Enchantments
21 Showing 1-10 of 21
All enchantments (21)
- The Antiquities War relevance 0.49 · 14.5% (47 of 325 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.41 · 31.7% (103 of 325 decks)
- Does Machines relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (41 of 325 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.42 · 18.2% (59 of 325 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.34 · 34.2% (111 of 325 decks)
- Artificer's Intuition relevance 0.46 · 9.2% (30 of 325 decks)
- Drake Haven relevance 0.48 · 6.8% (22 of 325 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.38 · 11.1% (36 of 325 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (16 of 325 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.26 · 11.1% (36 of 325 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.34 · 4.0% (13 of 325 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.25 · 10.8% (35 of 325 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (9 of 325 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (24 of 325 decks)
- Hard Cover relevance 0.38 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.19 · 14.2% (46 of 325 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.15 · 3.4% (11 of 325 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 4.9% (16 of 325 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.09 · 3.4% (11 of 325 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.08 · 3.1% (10 of 325 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Stern Lesson relevance 0.72 · 64.0% (208 of 325 decks)
- Circular Logic relevance 0.64 · 32.6% (106 of 325 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.58 · 29.8% (97 of 325 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.42 · 53.2% (173 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Command relevance 0.53 · 19.1% (62 of 325 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.44 · 18.8% (61 of 325 decks)
- Ugin's Binding relevance 0.47 · 12.6% (41 of 325 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.44 · 16.3% (53 of 325 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.44 · 10.5% (34 of 325 decks)
- Refute relevance 0.36 · 24.3% (79 of 325 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (61 of 325 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.31 · 28.6% (93 of 325 decks)
- Machine Over Matter relevance 0.43 · 7.4% (24 of 325 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.40 · 8.6% (28 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Rebuff relevance 0.41 · 5.5% (18 of 325 decks)
- Mirrorform relevance 0.35 · 11.4% (37 of 325 decks)
- You Find the Villains' Lair relevance 0.36 · 8.6% (28 of 325 decks)
- Assert Authority relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (14 of 325 decks)
- Pulse of the Grid relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (14 of 325 decks)
- Just the Wind relevance 0.42 · 3.4% (11 of 325 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (15 of 325 decks)
- Failed Inspection relevance 0.42 · 2.8% (9 of 325 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.23 · 16.0% (52 of 325 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.23 · 13.2% (43 of 325 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.24 · 9.2% (30 of 325 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.20 · 14.8% (48 of 325 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.15 · 40.3% (131 of 325 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.24 · 6.8% (22 of 325 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.21 · 11.4% (37 of 325 decks)
- Cerebral Download relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (9 of 325 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.16 · 17.5% (57 of 325 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Forbid relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.13 · 17.2% (56 of 325 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.12 · 21.8% (71 of 325 decks)
- Lazotep Plating relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.15 · 7.7% (25 of 325 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (20 of 325 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (10 of 325 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (10 of 325 decks)
- Perplexing Test relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.10 · 15.4% (50 of 325 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.11 · 12.0% (39 of 325 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (11 of 325 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.11 · 12.6% (41 of 325 decks)
- Long River's Pull relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.11 · 5.5% (18 of 325 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.10 · 6.8% (22 of 325 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.09 · 11.1% (36 of 325 decks)
Sorceries
23
Sorceries
23 Showing 1-10 of 23
All sorceries (23)
- Argivian Restoration relevance 0.63 · 36.0% (117 of 325 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.50 · 46.2% (150 of 325 decks)
- Splitting the Powerstone relevance 0.66 · 12.3% (40 of 325 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.44 · 12.3% (40 of 325 decks)
- Forging the Anchor relevance 0.48 · 7.1% (23 of 325 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.31 · 36.6% (119 of 325 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 0.40 · 4.6% (15 of 325 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (19 of 325 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.31 · 6.8% (22 of 325 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.28 · 10.5% (34 of 325 decks)
- All Is Dust relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (15 of 325 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.25 · 6.5% (21 of 325 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.25 · 5.5% (18 of 325 decks)
- Drafna's Restoration relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (14 of 325 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.17 · 15.1% (49 of 325 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.20 · 5.8% (19 of 325 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (16 of 325 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (18 of 325 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (22 of 325 decks)
- Spirit Water Revival relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (9 of 325 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (11 of 325 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (9 of 325 decks)
Planeswalkers
7
Planeswalkers
7 Showing 1-7 of 7
All planeswalkers (7)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.59 · 21.8% (71 of 325 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.46 · 21.5% (70 of 325 decks)
- Karn, Scion of Urza relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (24 of 325 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.32 · 11.7% (38 of 325 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (18 of 325 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (9 of 325 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (13 of 325 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All utility lands (50)
- Hall of Tagsin relevance 0.68 · 32.9% (107 of 325 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.56 · 29.5% (96 of 325 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.52 · 28.3% (92 of 325 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.43 · 38.2% (124 of 325 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.43 · 29.2% (95 of 325 decks)
- The Great Mound relevance 0.54 · 6.2% (20 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Factory relevance 0.47 · 8.9% (29 of 325 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.37 · 19.4% (63 of 325 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.28 · 46.2% (150 of 325 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.41 · 12.0% (39 of 325 decks)
- Arch of Orazca relevance 0.46 · 6.8% (22 of 325 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.29 · 35.7% (116 of 325 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.31 · 25.5% (83 of 325 decks)
- Drownyard Temple relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (25 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.34 · 16.0% (52 of 325 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.28 · 23.1% (75 of 325 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.35 · 8.3% (27 of 325 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.29 · 12.0% (39 of 325 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.21 · 35.7% (116 of 325 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (16 of 325 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.34 · 4.3% (14 of 325 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.23 · 20.3% (66 of 325 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.21 · 14.8% (48 of 325 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.23 · 10.8% (35 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.20 · 19.1% (62 of 325 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.25 · 6.8% (22 of 325 decks)
- Sunken Palace relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (15 of 325 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (16 of 325 decks)
- Phyrexia's Core relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (14 of 325 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.19 · 9.5% (31 of 325 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (11 of 325 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.20 · 4.9% (16 of 325 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (9 of 325 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.16 · 12.3% (40 of 325 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.18 · 7.4% (24 of 325 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.20 · 4.6% (15 of 325 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (9 of 325 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (12 of 325 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 12.3% (40 of 325 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (11 of 325 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.16 · 6.5% (21 of 325 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (9 of 325 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 12.0% (39 of 325 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (20 of 325 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (20 of 325 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.15 · 5.5% (18 of 325 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (12 of 325 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 13.5% (44 of 325 decks)
Lands
15
Lands
15 Showing 1-10 of 15
All lands (15)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.67 · 35.7% (116 of 325 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.31 · 63.1% (205 of 325 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.45 · 14.5% (47 of 325 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.24 · 71.7% (233 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.35 · 18.8% (61 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.35 · 18.5% (60 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.35 · 18.5% (60 of 325 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.41 · 5.8% (19 of 325 decks)
- Urza's Workshop relevance 0.38 · 8.6% (28 of 325 decks)
- Conqueror's Galleon // Conqueror's Foothold relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (10 of 325 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.28 · 3.1% (10 of 325 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (10 of 325 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (8 of 325 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.14 · 3.1% (10 of 325 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 90.5% (294 of 325 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Urza, Powerstone Prodigy, from 325 real Commander decks.