Sinister Concierge
Played in 185 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
3.8% Dimir
All commanders (10)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 3.45 · 9.8% (46 of 469 decks)
- Kang Prime relevance 2.43 · 5.7% (20 of 348 decks)
- Kels, Fight Fixer relevance 1.81 · 3.1% (13 of 415 decks)
- Hidetsugu and Kairi relevance 1.62 · 1.2% (23 of 1,952 decks)
- Cyclonus, the Saboteur // Cyclonus, Cybertronian Fighter relevance 1.39 · 3.6% (6 of 166 decks)
- Rassilon, the War President relevance 1.31 · 2.3% (7 of 299 decks)
- Truss, Chief Engineer relevance 0.74 · 3.0% (2 of 67 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor // Burakos, Party Leader relevance 0.71 · 1.2% (3 of 246 decks)
- Feywild Visitor // Sivriss, Nightmare Speaker relevance 0.43 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.42 · 2.0% (1 of 51 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lose Focus relevance 2.10 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 2.02 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 1.97 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Fire Nation Occupation relevance 1.86 · 32.4% (60 of 185 decks)
- Remand relevance 1.86 · 37.3% (69 of 185 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 1.83 · 36.8% (68 of 185 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 1.75 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.61 · 26.5% (49 of 185 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 1.59 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Bloodchief's Thirst relevance 1.57 · 25.9% (48 of 185 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 1.49 · 37.3% (69 of 185 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 1.45 · 37.3% (69 of 185 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 1.43 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 1.43 · 34.6% (64 of 185 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 1.41 · 33.0% (61 of 185 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 1.40 · 35.7% (66 of 185 decks)
- Barrowgoyf relevance 1.38 · 25.9% (48 of 185 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.34 · 32.4% (60 of 185 decks)
- Requiting Hex relevance 1.34 · 20.5% (38 of 185 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 1.34 · 33.0% (61 of 185 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.33 · 30.8% (57 of 185 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 1.33 · 28.1% (52 of 185 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 1.32 · 35.7% (66 of 185 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 1.30 · 27.0% (50 of 185 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.25 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 1.23 · 36.8% (68 of 185 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.15 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 1.15 · 27.0% (50 of 185 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 1.11 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 1.11 · 35.1% (65 of 185 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Subtlety relevance 1.43 · 34.6% (64 of 185 decks)
- Barrowgoyf relevance 1.38 · 25.9% (48 of 185 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 1.32 · 35.7% (66 of 185 decks)
- Abhorrent Oculus relevance 1.30 · 27.0% (50 of 185 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 1.11 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 1.01 · 35.1% (65 of 185 decks)
- Jhoira's Timebug relevance 0.99 · 14.6% (27 of 185 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.93 · 15.7% (29 of 185 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Fire Nation Occupation relevance 1.86 · 32.4% (60 of 185 decks)
All instants (24)
- Lose Focus relevance 2.10 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 2.02 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 1.97 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Remand relevance 1.86 · 37.3% (69 of 185 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 1.83 · 36.8% (68 of 185 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 1.75 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.61 · 26.5% (49 of 185 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 1.59 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 1.49 · 37.3% (69 of 185 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 1.45 · 37.3% (69 of 185 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 1.43 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 1.41 · 33.0% (61 of 185 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 1.40 · 35.7% (66 of 185 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.34 · 32.4% (60 of 185 decks)
- Requiting Hex relevance 1.34 · 20.5% (38 of 185 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.33 · 30.8% (57 of 185 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 1.33 · 28.1% (52 of 185 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 1.25 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 1.23 · 36.8% (68 of 185 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 1.15 · 27.0% (50 of 185 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 1.11 · 35.1% (65 of 185 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.08 · 16.2% (30 of 185 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 1.05 · 25.9% (48 of 185 decks)
- Dismember relevance 1.00 · 33.5% (62 of 185 decks)
All sorceries (7)
- Bloodchief's Thirst relevance 1.57 · 25.9% (48 of 185 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 1.34 · 33.0% (61 of 185 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.15 · 34.1% (63 of 185 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 1.04 · 18.4% (34 of 185 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 1.04 · 28.6% (53 of 185 decks)
- Thoughtseize relevance 1.01 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 0.97 · 15.1% (28 of 185 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 1.19 · 26.5% (49 of 185 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 1.16 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.93 · 34.6% (64 of 185 decks)
All lands (7)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.98 · 35.7% (66 of 185 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.97 · 37.3% (69 of 185 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.96 · 36.2% (67 of 185 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.95 · 35.7% (66 of 185 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.95 · 33.5% (62 of 185 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.93 · 35.7% (66 of 185 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.92 · 36.8% (68 of 185 decks)
EDH data for Sinister Concierge: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 185 real decks.