Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Creeping Bloodsucker relevance 0.68 · 35.0% (57 of 163 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.55 · 52.1% (85 of 163 decks)
- Court of Ambition relevance 0.57 · 46.0% (75 of 163 decks)
- Starscream, Power Hungry // Starscream, Seeker Leader relevance 0.61 · 36.2% (59 of 163 decks)
- Energy Chamber relevance 0.70 · 22.7% (37 of 163 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.49 · 55.2% (90 of 163 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.56 · 41.7% (68 of 163 decks)
- Indulgent Tormentor relevance 0.63 · 26.4% (43 of 163 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.55 · 38.7% (63 of 163 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.52 · 44.2% (72 of 163 decks)
- Mask of the Schemer relevance 0.58 · 32.5% (53 of 163 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.51 · 43.6% (71 of 163 decks)
- Palace Siege relevance 0.60 · 25.8% (42 of 163 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.45 · 50.9% (83 of 163 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 0.60 · 20.9% (34 of 163 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.48 · 42.3% (69 of 163 decks)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 0.44 · 50.9% (83 of 163 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.50 · 36.2% (59 of 163 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.42 · 52.8% (86 of 163 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.54 · 28.8% (47 of 163 decks)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 0.58 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.56 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Duskmantle Seer relevance 0.54 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.49 · 25.8% (42 of 163 decks)
- Blitzwing, Cruel Tormentor // Blitzwing, Adaptive Assailant relevance 0.55 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.51 · 18.4% (30 of 163 decks)
- Protection Racket relevance 0.50 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Bloodgift Demon relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.42 · 34.4% (56 of 163 decks)
- Keen Duelist relevance 0.45 · 23.9% (39 of 163 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.47 · 19.6% (32 of 163 decks)
- Followed Footsteps relevance 0.51 · 12.9% (21 of 163 decks)
- Rilsa Rael, Kingpin relevance 0.46 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Oskar, Rubbish Reclaimer relevance 0.47 · 15.3% (25 of 163 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.40 · 29.4% (48 of 163 decks)
- Court of Locthwain relevance 0.42 · 23.3% (38 of 163 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.44 · 17.8% (29 of 163 decks)
- Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 0.42 · 22.7% (37 of 163 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Jetfire, Ingenious Scientist // Jetfire, Air Guardian relevance 0.53 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.49 · 9.2% (15 of 163 decks)
- Tomb of Horrors Adventurer relevance 0.43 · 14.1% (23 of 163 decks)
- Ring of Xathrid relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Mind Unbound relevance 0.51 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Change of Plans relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Braids, Conjurer Adept relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Herald of Leshrac relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
Card Stacks
22
Card Stacks
22Showing 1-2 of 22
Cards like Extravagant Replication
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Keen Duelist
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Keen Duelist 24%
- Duskmantle Seer 19%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other Dimir decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Dimir decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.48 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 46%
- Lightning Greaves 38%
Cards like Feed the Swarm
1.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 45% of other Dimir decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other Dimir decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.62 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Feed the Swarm 37%
- Infernal Grasp 26%
- Withering Torment 17%
Cards like Etherium Sculptor
3.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Etherium Sculptor 29%
- Foundry Inspector 17%
- Cloud Key 2%
Other options: Planar Gate, Helm of Awakening, Mana Matrix, Stone Calendar
Cards like Court of Ambition
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Dimir decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 26% of other Dimir decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Counterspell 53%
- Negate 37%
- Essence Scatter 2%
- Disruption Protocol 2%
- Remove Soul 2%
- Wash Away 1%
Other options: Spell Snare, Preemptive Strike, Envelop, Intervene, Stern Scolding, False Summoning, Nullify, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Minor Misstep, Wild Unraveling, Outwit
Cards like Indulgent Tormentor
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Security Bypass
20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Security Bypass 18%
- Aqueous Form 12%
Cards like Psychosis Crawler
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Strionic Resonator
8.7× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Fireshrieker
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Fireshrieker 44%
- Rover Blades 5%
Cards like Brass Knuckles
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Brass Knuckles 17%
- Grappling Hook 5%
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.5× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Dimir decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Pongify
1.4× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Dimir decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Pongify 20%
- Rapid Hybridization 14%
Cards like Triskaidekaphile
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Other options: Reed Richards, Smartest Man, Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan
Cards like Thopter Spy Network
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Go for the Throat
1.8× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.19 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Other options: Cast Down, Ultimate Price, Power Word Kill
Cards like Phyrexian Arena
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Dimir decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Phyrexian Arena 39%
- Dark Tutelage 1%
Cards like Containment Construct
14× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.1× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 81% of other Dimir decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other Dimir decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.92 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 75%
- Commander's Sphere 13%
Cards like Padeem, Consul of Innovation
10× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Creeping Bloodsucker relevance 0.68 · 35.0% (57 of 163 decks)
- Starscream, Power Hungry // Starscream, Seeker Leader relevance 0.61 · 36.2% (59 of 163 decks)
- Indulgent Tormentor relevance 0.63 · 26.4% (43 of 163 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.48 · 42.3% (69 of 163 decks)
- Twilight Prophet relevance 0.44 · 50.9% (83 of 163 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.42 · 52.8% (86 of 163 decks)
- Triskaidekaphile relevance 0.54 · 28.8% (47 of 163 decks)
- Duskmantle Seer relevance 0.54 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 0.49 · 25.8% (42 of 163 decks)
- Blitzwing, Cruel Tormentor // Blitzwing, Adaptive Assailant relevance 0.55 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- Bloodgift Demon relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- Keen Duelist relevance 0.45 · 23.9% (39 of 163 decks)
- Rilsa Rael, Kingpin relevance 0.46 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Oskar, Rubbish Reclaimer relevance 0.47 · 15.3% (25 of 163 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.40 · 29.4% (48 of 163 decks)
- Xanathar, Guild Kingpin relevance 0.42 · 22.7% (37 of 163 decks)
- Jacob Hauken, Inspector // Hauken's Insight relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Jetfire, Ingenious Scientist // Jetfire, Air Guardian relevance 0.53 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Tomb of Horrors Adventurer relevance 0.43 · 14.1% (23 of 163 decks)
- Braids, Conjurer Adept relevance 0.47 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Herald of Leshrac relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.32 · 28.8% (47 of 163 decks)
- Archfiend of Ifnir relevance 0.36 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Leader, Super-Genius relevance 0.39 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.38 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Scrawling Crawler relevance 0.37 · 11.7% (19 of 163 decks)
- Big Game Hunter relevance 0.36 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Ultron, Unlimited relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Gurgling Anointer relevance 0.38 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Sheoldred, Whispering One relevance 0.29 · 20.9% (34 of 163 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 0.28 · 23.9% (39 of 163 decks)
- Bone Miser relevance 0.34 · 9.2% (15 of 163 decks)
- Dark Confidant relevance 0.34 · 9.2% (15 of 163 decks)
- Scientist Supreme of A.I.M. relevance 0.36 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Ravenloft Adventurer relevance 0.33 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.29 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.27 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Kang, Temporal Tyrant relevance 0.34 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Gixian Puppeteer relevance 0.34 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Thassa, God of the Sea relevance 0.31 · 9.2% (15 of 163 decks)
- Krang, the All-Powerful relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Aarakocra Sneak relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.29 · 9.2% (15 of 163 decks)
- Chronozoa relevance 0.39 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.26 · 12.9% (21 of 163 decks)
- Vicious Battlerager relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Feywild Caretaker relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.28 · 7.4% (12 of 163 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Energy Chamber relevance 0.70 · 22.7% (37 of 163 decks)
- Fireshrieker relevance 0.52 · 44.2% (72 of 163 decks)
- Mask of the Schemer relevance 0.58 · 32.5% (53 of 163 decks)
- Gavel of the Righteous relevance 0.60 · 20.9% (34 of 163 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.50 · 36.2% (59 of 163 decks)
- Brass Knuckles relevance 0.56 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Leyline Axe relevance 0.51 · 18.4% (30 of 163 decks)
- Genji Glove relevance 0.47 · 19.6% (32 of 163 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.49 · 9.2% (15 of 163 decks)
- Ring of Xathrid relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Darksteel Reactor relevance 0.45 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.31 · 33.7% (55 of 163 decks)
- Hero's Blade relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Monument to Endurance relevance 0.36 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Bonesplitter relevance 0.46 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Sol Talisman relevance 0.39 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Venser's Journal relevance 0.41 · 7.4% (12 of 163 decks)
- Rover Blades relevance 0.42 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Grappling Hook relevance 0.42 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Strionic Resonator relevance 0.31 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.32 · 14.1% (23 of 163 decks)
- Ivory Tower relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Sarevok's Tome relevance 0.35 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Cranial Plating relevance 0.32 · 9.8% (16 of 163 decks)
- Lithoform Engine relevance 0.32 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Aether Vial relevance 0.34 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Dungeoneer's Pack relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.32 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Armageddon Clock relevance 0.41 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 0.30 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Commander's Plate relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Gate to the Aether relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- The Temporal Anchor relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Loxodon Warhammer relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.30 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.24 · 15.3% (25 of 163 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.29 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.17 · 46.0% (75 of 163 decks)
- Trailblazer's Torch relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Buster Sword relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- The Key to the Vault relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Conformer Shuriken relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Blackblade Reforged relevance 0.28 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.27 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Ace's Baseball Bat relevance 0.35 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 50.3% (82 of 163 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.55 · 52.1% (85 of 163 decks)
- Court of Ambition relevance 0.57 · 46.0% (75 of 163 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.49 · 55.2% (90 of 163 decks)
- Shadow of the Second Sun relevance 0.56 · 41.7% (68 of 163 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.55 · 38.7% (63 of 163 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.51 · 43.6% (71 of 163 decks)
- Palace Siege relevance 0.60 · 25.8% (42 of 163 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.45 · 50.9% (83 of 163 decks)
- Protection Racket relevance 0.50 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.42 · 34.4% (56 of 163 decks)
- Followed Footsteps relevance 0.51 · 12.9% (21 of 163 decks)
- Court of Locthwain relevance 0.42 · 23.3% (38 of 163 decks)
- Security Bypass relevance 0.44 · 17.8% (29 of 163 decks)
- Mind Unbound relevance 0.51 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Triskaidekaphobia relevance 0.40 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.34 · 12.3% (20 of 163 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.24 · 39.3% (64 of 163 decks)
- Virtue of Persistence // Locthwain Scorn relevance 0.31 · 12.3% (20 of 163 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.30 · 12.9% (21 of 163 decks)
- Glorious Purpose relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.32 · 9.2% (15 of 163 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.32 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.30 · 7.4% (12 of 163 decks)
- Ill-Gotten Inheritance relevance 0.36 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Faith of the Devoted relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Call of the Ring relevance 0.26 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.24 · 12.9% (21 of 163 decks)
- Kumena's Awakening relevance 0.36 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Struggle for Project Purity relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Estrid's Invocation relevance 0.32 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Wiretapping relevance 0.35 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.21 · 12.3% (20 of 163 decks)
- Obsessive Pursuit relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Endless Evil relevance 0.22 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Creeping Dread relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Cartouche of Ambition relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Phyrexian Scriptures relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.20 · 9.2% (15 of 163 decks)
- Feast on the Fallen relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Dictate of Kruphix relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.16 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Dreadhorde Invasion relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.23 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Observed Stasis relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Case of the Shifting Visage relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Age of Ultron relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Kang Dynasty relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Dying to Serve relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Feast of Sanity relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Change of Plans relevance 0.43 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- Suspended Sentence relevance 0.40 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.31 · 21.5% (35 of 163 decks)
- Lethal Scheme relevance 0.29 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- Dark Withering relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Blessing of Belzenlok relevance 0.36 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Infernal Grasp relevance 0.19 · 25.8% (42 of 163 decks)
- Countersquall relevance 0.22 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Butcher's Glee relevance 0.35 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.22 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.19 · 14.1% (23 of 163 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.18 · 19.6% (32 of 163 decks)
- Boon of Erebos relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.18 · 15.3% (25 of 163 decks)
- Withering Torment relevance 0.17 · 16.6% (27 of 163 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.25 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.14 · 32.5% (53 of 163 decks)
- Go for the Throat relevance 0.17 · 16.0% (26 of 163 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.13 · 37.4% (61 of 163 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Alchemist's Gift relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.25 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Archenemy's Charm relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Bitter Triumph relevance 0.19 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.17 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.14 · 18.4% (30 of 163 decks)
- Professor's Warning relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.11 · 41.1% (67 of 163 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.13 · 14.1% (23 of 163 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.14 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.14 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.15 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.20 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.11 · 23.9% (39 of 163 decks)
- Imp's Mischief relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Darkness relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.12 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Shoot the Sheriff relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.12 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.07 · 53.4% (87 of 163 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.11 · 14.7% (24 of 163 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.13 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Inspiring Refrain relevance 0.58 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 0.40 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Profane Tutor relevance 0.34 · 14.7% (24 of 163 decks)
- Reality Strobe relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Inevitable Betrayal relevance 0.35 · 9.8% (16 of 163 decks)
- Curse of the Cabal relevance 0.38 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Call to the Netherworld relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Gix's Command relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Decree of Pain relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.25 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Charnel Serenade relevance 0.24 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Savor the Moment relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Make an Example relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Drown in Ichor relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.14 · 30.7% (50 of 163 decks)
- Echo of Eons relevance 0.26 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- From the Catacombs relevance 0.23 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.14 · 25.2% (41 of 163 decks)
- Vat Emergence relevance 0.24 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.12 · 36.8% (60 of 163 decks)
- Peer into the Abyss relevance 0.21 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.15 · 7.4% (12 of 163 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.14 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 0.14 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.13 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Karn's Temporal Sundering relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.13 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.13 · 7.4% (12 of 163 decks)
- Ringsight relevance 0.15 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Restart Sequence relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Whispering Madness relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.11 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 0.13 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
Planeswalkers
4
Planeswalkers
4 Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
All planeswalkers (4)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.37 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.20 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Spymaster's Vault relevance 0.30 · 15.3% (25 of 163 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.31 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.16 · 49.7% (81 of 163 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.26 · 9.8% (16 of 163 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.24 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 57.7% (94 of 163 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.25 · 7.4% (12 of 163 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.24 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.24 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Throne of the High City relevance 0.30 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Barren Moor relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.23 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 19.6% (32 of 163 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.18 · 12.9% (21 of 163 decks)
- Cathedral of War relevance 0.30 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.19 · 9.8% (16 of 163 decks)
- Realm of Koh relevance 0.24 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Mortuary Mire relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.16 · 13.5% (22 of 163 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.17 · 11.7% (19 of 163 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.15 · 16.0% (26 of 163 decks)
- Shizo, Death's Storehouse relevance 0.18 · 7.4% (12 of 163 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.11 · 41.7% (68 of 163 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.18 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- The Gold Saucer relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.14 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Creeping Tar Pit relevance 0.17 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.15 · 12.3% (20 of 163 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.17 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.17 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.14 · 11.7% (19 of 163 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.12 · 26.4% (43 of 163 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (13 of 163 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.21 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 11.7% (19 of 163 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 10.4% (17 of 163 decks)
- Zof Consumption // Zof Bloodbog relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Minas Morgul, Dark Fortress relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (6 of 163 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (7 of 163 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.19 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Waterfront District relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.17 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Serpent's Pass relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
Lands
46
Lands
46 Showing 1-10 of 46
Page size
All lands (46)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.23 · 12.9% (21 of 163 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.22 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.20 · 15.3% (25 of 163 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Mistvault Bridge relevance 0.21 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.14 · 25.2% (41 of 163 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.15 · 17.8% (29 of 163 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.14 · 23.3% (38 of 163 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.19 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.19 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.18 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.17 · 8.6% (14 of 163 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.15 · 11.7% (19 of 163 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.17 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.15 · 11.0% (18 of 163 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.12 · 28.8% (47 of 163 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.12 · 30.1% (49 of 163 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.17 · 4.9% (8 of 163 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.11 · 30.1% (49 of 163 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.10 · 36.8% (60 of 163 decks)
- River of Tears relevance 0.16 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.11 · 32.5% (53 of 163 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.16 · 5.5% (9 of 163 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.11 · 23.9% (39 of 163 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.15 · 6.1% (10 of 163 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.08 · 50.9% (83 of 163 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.08 · 58.9% (96 of 163 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.10 · 35.0% (57 of 163 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.14 · 6.7% (11 of 163 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.09 · 38.7% (63 of 163 decks)
- Soured Springs relevance 0.18 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.09 · 28.8% (47 of 163 decks)
- Hidden Lair relevance 0.16 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Submerged Boneyard relevance 0.15 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.06 · 59.5% (97 of 163 decks)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.12 · 3.1% (5 of 163 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (4 of 163 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.02 · 76.1% (124 of 163 decks)
- Swamp relevance 0.01 · 87.7% (143 of 163 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 88.3% (144 of 163 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Cyclonus, the Saboteur // Cyclonus, Cybertronian Fighter, from 163 real Commander decks.