Hungry Graffalon
Played in 183 Green decks
1530+26+3+10+11+
Color Identity Spread
17.1% Green
Commanders
Radagast the Brown 2.6% of decks
Radagast the Brown 2.6% of decks
Emil, Vastlands Roamer 3.6% of decks
Emil, Vastlands Roamer 3.6% of decks
Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary 4.7% of decks
Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary 4.7% of decks
Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Anara, Wolvid Familiar 16.7% of decks
Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Anara, Wolvid Familiar 16.7% of decks
Wilson, Refined Grizzly 2.2% of decks
Wilson, Refined Grizzly 2.2% of decks
Saryth, the Viper's Fang 1.0% of decks
Saryth, the Viper's Fang 1.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Efflorescence 30.1% of decks
Efflorescence 30.1% of decks
Noxious Newt 48.1% of decks
Noxious Newt 48.1% of decks
Shopkeeper's Bane 25.1% of decks
Shopkeeper's Bane 25.1% of decks
Follow the Lumarets 24.0% of decks
Follow the Lumarets 24.0% of decks
Glorious Decay 29.5% of decks
Glorious Decay 29.5% of decks
Wild Hypothesis 21.9% of decks
Wild Hypothesis 21.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (15)
- Radagast the Brown relevance 1.91 · 2.6% (19 of 734 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 1.44 · 3.6% (7 of 197 decks)
- Spider-Man, Brooklyn Visionary relevance 0.82 · 4.7% (2 of 43 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.68 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.66 · 2.2% (2 of 92 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.65 · 1.0% (3 of 295 decks)
- Ghalta the Unstoppable relevance 0.53 · 1.1% (2 of 188 decks)
- Tippy-Toe, Terrific Partner relevance 0.50 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
- The Thing, Ben Grimm relevance 0.46 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Hulk, Brutal Brawler relevance 0.46 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.38 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Loot, the Nexus relevance 0.38 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
- Marwyn, the Preserver relevance 0.37 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
- Bushmaster, Coiled Henchman relevance 0.35 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 0.34 · 1.2% (1 of 85 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Efflorescence relevance 1.78 · 30.1% (55 of 183 decks)
- Noxious Newt relevance 1.68 · 48.1% (88 of 183 decks)
- Shopkeeper's Bane relevance 1.57 · 25.1% (46 of 183 decks)
- Follow the Lumarets relevance 1.50 · 24.0% (44 of 183 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 1.46 · 29.5% (54 of 183 decks)
- Wild Hypothesis relevance 1.45 · 21.9% (40 of 183 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 1.18 · 22.4% (41 of 183 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 1.14 · 24.6% (45 of 183 decks)
- Studious First-Year // Rampant Growth relevance 1.14 · 42.6% (78 of 183 decks)
- Additive Evolution relevance 1.13 · 19.7% (36 of 183 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.07 · 33.3% (61 of 183 decks)
- Burrog Barrage relevance 1.05 · 17.5% (32 of 183 decks)
- Zimone's Experiment relevance 1.03 · 19.7% (36 of 183 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 1.01 · 24.6% (45 of 183 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.90 · 18.6% (34 of 183 decks)
- Infirmary Healer // Stream of Life relevance 0.89 · 14.2% (26 of 183 decks)
- Aberrant Manawurm relevance 0.88 · 13.1% (24 of 183 decks)
- Environmental Scientist relevance 0.85 · 15.3% (28 of 183 decks)
- Chelonian Tackle relevance 0.80 · 12.6% (23 of 183 decks)
- Ambitious Augmenter relevance 0.76 · 12.6% (23 of 183 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.76 · 19.7% (36 of 183 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (38 of 183 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.71 · 27.3% (50 of 183 decks)
- Wilderland Scrounger relevance 0.70 · 13.7% (25 of 183 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.69 · 21.9% (40 of 183 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.67 · 18.6% (34 of 183 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 0.66 · 12.0% (22 of 183 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.66 · 13.1% (24 of 183 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 0.62 · 13.7% (25 of 183 decks)
- Nasty Little Rabbit relevance 0.62 · 11.5% (21 of 183 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Noxious Newt relevance 1.68 · 48.1% (88 of 183 decks)
- Shopkeeper's Bane relevance 1.57 · 25.1% (46 of 183 decks)
- Studious First-Year // Rampant Growth relevance 1.14 · 42.6% (78 of 183 decks)
- Topiary Lecturer relevance 1.01 · 24.6% (45 of 183 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.90 · 18.6% (34 of 183 decks)
- Infirmary Healer // Stream of Life relevance 0.89 · 14.2% (26 of 183 decks)
- Aberrant Manawurm relevance 0.88 · 13.1% (24 of 183 decks)
- Environmental Scientist relevance 0.85 · 15.3% (28 of 183 decks)
- Ambitious Augmenter relevance 0.76 · 12.6% (23 of 183 decks)
- Wilderland Scrounger relevance 0.70 · 13.7% (25 of 183 decks)
- Badgermole relevance 0.67 · 18.6% (34 of 183 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 0.66 · 12.0% (22 of 183 decks)
- Nasty Little Rabbit relevance 0.62 · 11.5% (21 of 183 decks)
- Flopsie, Bumi's Buddy relevance 0.62 · 15.8% (29 of 183 decks)
- Beorn, Reluctant Host // Till and Tend relevance 0.60 · 16.4% (30 of 183 decks)
- Michelangelo, Game Master relevance 0.60 · 9.8% (18 of 183 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.59 · 13.1% (24 of 183 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.58 · 13.1% (24 of 183 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.56 · 14.8% (27 of 183 decks)
- Lurking Lizards relevance 0.55 · 8.7% (16 of 183 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.54 · 14.2% (26 of 183 decks)
- Primordial Pachyderm relevance 0.54 · 8.2% (15 of 183 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.54 · 10.9% (20 of 183 decks)
- Treetop Snarespinner relevance 0.53 · 11.5% (21 of 183 decks)
- Slumbering Trudge relevance 0.53 · 12.0% (22 of 183 decks)
- Vastlands Scavenger // Bind to Life relevance 0.52 · 15.8% (29 of 183 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Additive Evolution relevance 1.13 · 19.7% (36 of 183 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.66 · 13.1% (24 of 183 decks)
- Beorn's Hospitality relevance 0.58 · 17.5% (32 of 183 decks)
All instants (10)
- Efflorescence relevance 1.78 · 30.1% (55 of 183 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 1.46 · 29.5% (54 of 183 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 1.07 · 33.3% (61 of 183 decks)
- Burrog Barrage relevance 1.05 · 17.5% (32 of 183 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.76 · 19.7% (36 of 183 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.69 · 21.9% (40 of 183 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 0.62 · 13.7% (25 of 183 decks)
- Quarrel relevance 0.61 · 13.1% (24 of 183 decks)
- Unforgiving Aim relevance 0.58 · 10.4% (19 of 183 decks)
- Warg Tactics relevance 0.56 · 12.0% (22 of 183 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Follow the Lumarets relevance 1.50 · 24.0% (44 of 183 decks)
- Wild Hypothesis relevance 1.45 · 21.9% (40 of 183 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 1.18 · 22.4% (41 of 183 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 1.14 · 24.6% (45 of 183 decks)
- Zimone's Experiment relevance 1.03 · 19.7% (36 of 183 decks)
- Chelonian Tackle relevance 0.80 · 12.6% (23 of 183 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.74 · 20.8% (38 of 183 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.71 · 27.3% (50 of 183 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.59 · 12.0% (22 of 183 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.54 · 11.5% (21 of 183 decks)
- Earthbending Lesson relevance 0.52 · 12.0% (22 of 183 decks)
EDH data for Hungry Graffalon: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 183 real decks.














































