Cards like Voracious Hydra
10× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
39% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other green decks
Cards
- Voracious Hydra 40%
- Kinetic Ooze 29%
- Benevolent Hydra 16%
- Steelbane Hydra 15%
- Primordial Hydra 9%
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
13× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other green decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Hardened Scales
5.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other green decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other green decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.51 in other green decks
Cards
Other options: Woodcutter's Grit, Overprotect
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
25% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
- Duskshell Crawler 65%
- Pridemalkin 21%
- Tuskguard Captain 14%
- Gnarlid Colony 13%
- Drix Fatemaker 9%
- Crowned Ceratok 5%
- Trollbred Guardian 3%
Other options: Baloth Pup
Cards like Go Nuts!
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other green decks
Cards
- Go Nuts! 34%
- Epic Fight 29%
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.4× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
73% of decks run one or more
vs. 59% of other green decks
61% of decks run two or more
vs. 45% of other green decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other green decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 66%
- Elvish Mystic 61%
- Fyndhorn Elves 21%
- Orochi Merge-Keeper 4%
- Boreal Druid 3%
Other options: Nantuko Elder, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
5.1× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other green decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other green decks
0.89 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
3.0× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Gaea's Gift
7.3× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other green decks
Cards like Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11
13× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other green decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other green decks
Cards like Goldvein Hydra
3.7× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other green decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Evolution Witness
Over 20× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other green decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Terrasymbiosis
3.9× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other green decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other green decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other green decks
Cards
Cards like Training Regimen
14× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other green decks
Cards
- Training Regimen 18%
- Sphere Grid 10%
Cards like Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig
8.6× as likely as other green decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other green decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other green decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other green decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.49 · 65.0% (52 of 80 decks)
- Knight of Wundagore relevance 0.58 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.49 · 53.8% (43 of 80 decks)
- Rocksteady, Mutant Marauder relevance 0.53 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.37 · 65.0% (52 of 80 decks)
- Leatherhead, Iron Gator relevance 0.42 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.42 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Dependable Quinjet relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Go Nuts! relevance 0.40 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Kinetic Ooze relevance 0.42 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 0.31 · 56.3% (45 of 80 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.32 · 51.2% (41 of 80 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.36 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.28 · 62.5% (50 of 80 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.35 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Emeritus of Abundance // Regrowth relevance 0.35 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 0.36 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.34 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.24 · 63.7% (51 of 80 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 0.30 · 40.0% (32 of 80 decks)
- Doc Samson, Super Psychiatrist relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Canopy Gargantuan relevance 0.32 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.35 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.27 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.34 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.22 · 67.5% (54 of 80 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.21 · 68.8% (55 of 80 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.35 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.29 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.26 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.24 · 48.8% (39 of 80 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.26 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.30 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.33 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.29 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.31 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.30 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Verdurous Gearhulk relevance 0.33 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.26 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.23 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.31 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.22 · 51.2% (41 of 80 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.32 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Noxious Newt relevance 0.28 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Rhino, Terrible Trampler relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.23 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.27 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.26 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.19 · 58.8% (47 of 80 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Fynn, the Fangbearer relevance 0.49 · 65.0% (52 of 80 decks)
- Knight of Wundagore relevance 0.58 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.49 · 53.8% (43 of 80 decks)
- Rocksteady, Mutant Marauder relevance 0.53 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.37 · 65.0% (52 of 80 decks)
- Leatherhead, Iron Gator relevance 0.42 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Taunting Elf relevance 0.42 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Kinetic Ooze relevance 0.42 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 0.31 · 56.3% (45 of 80 decks)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 0.35 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Emeritus of Abundance // Regrowth relevance 0.35 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.24 · 63.7% (51 of 80 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 0.30 · 40.0% (32 of 80 decks)
- Doc Samson, Super Psychiatrist relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Canopy Gargantuan relevance 0.32 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Pridemalkin relevance 0.35 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.29 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.26 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.24 · 48.8% (39 of 80 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.26 · 41.3% (33 of 80 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.30 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Michelangelo, Mutant BFF relevance 0.33 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Verdurous Gearhulk relevance 0.33 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.23 · 45.0% (36 of 80 decks)
- Michelangelo, Weirdness to 11 relevance 0.31 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.22 · 51.2% (41 of 80 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.32 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Noxious Newt relevance 0.28 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Rhino, Terrible Trampler relevance 0.35 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.26 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Wildborn Preserver relevance 0.30 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Ohran Frostfang relevance 0.19 · 58.8% (47 of 80 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.27 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.24 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Vizier of the Menagerie relevance 0.28 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.28 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.25 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Gnarlid Colony relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Mossborn Hydra relevance 0.20 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
- Mister Hyde, Monster Within relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.25 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Bloated Contaminator relevance 0.25 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Vigor relevance 0.20 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.23 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Longshot Squad relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Rampaging Yao Guai relevance 0.23 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Basking Broodscale relevance 0.27 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 0.23 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Aquastrand Spider relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.17 · 43.8% (35 of 80 decks)
All artifacts (35)
- Dependable Quinjet relevance 0.51 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.28 · 62.5% (50 of 80 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.28 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.22 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Fractal Harness relevance 0.27 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Spellweaver Helix relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.15 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Locket of Yesterdays relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Armory of Iroas relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.18 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Emerald Medallion relevance 0.09 · 58.8% (47 of 80 decks)
- Hunter's Bow relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Smuggler's Copter relevance 0.16 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Blitzball relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.10 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Dragon Throne of Tarkir relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.13 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Strata Scythe relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.09 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sword of Feast and Famine relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sledge-Class Seedship relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.04 · 70.0% (56 of 80 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.07 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Akroma's Memorial relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- High Score relevance 0.36 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.34 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.21 · 68.8% (55 of 80 decks)
- Training Regimen relevance 0.35 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.30 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Defense of the Heart relevance 0.26 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.21 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.22 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Additive Evolution relevance 0.30 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.21 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.17 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.22 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.20 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.21 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.15 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.13 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.19 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Grafted Growth relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Origin of the Hulk relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.18 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Claim the Kingdom relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.10 · 58.8% (47 of 80 decks)
- Primal Cocoon relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Bioengineered Future relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Tale of Katara and Toph relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Ride the Shoopuf relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Puca's Covenant relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.12 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.12 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Urban Burgeoning relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Family's Favor relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.11 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Spidersilk Armor relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Path of Discovery relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Song of Freyalise relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.09 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.09 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All instants (50)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.34 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.22 · 67.5% (54 of 80 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.29 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Tangle relevance 0.31 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 0.27 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.17 · 70.0% (56 of 80 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.25 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.21 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.23 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Titanic Brawl relevance 0.26 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.18 · 36.3% (29 of 80 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.21 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.16 · 50.0% (40 of 80 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.20 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Gift relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.18 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.15 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.17 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Fertilid's Favor relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Warg Tactics relevance 0.23 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Hunger of the Howlpack relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Efflorescence relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Fight for the Throne relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Force of Vigor relevance 0.15 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Avoid Fate relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.15 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Beast Mode relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Wrap in Vigor relevance 0.14 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Pillar Launch relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Battlegrowth relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Dragonscale Boon relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.08 · 55.0% (44 of 80 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.11 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Rapid Rescue relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.11 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.06 · 60.0% (48 of 80 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.10 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.16 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Burst of Strength relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Mutant's Prey relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Stony Strength relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Infectious Bite relevance 0.12 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Respite relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Quarrel relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Go Nuts! relevance 0.40 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.32 · 51.2% (41 of 80 decks)
- Epic Fight relevance 0.36 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.27 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Triumph of the Hordes relevance 0.23 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Slime Against Humanity relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Wild Hypothesis relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.25 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.23 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.15 · 40.0% (32 of 80 decks)
- Smell Fear relevance 0.20 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Thrive relevance 0.23 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Horrific Assault relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Feral Contest relevance 0.24 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Expanded Anatomy relevance 0.23 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.19 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.17 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.17 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Riding the Dilu Horse relevance 0.22 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.17 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Carnivorous Canopy relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Colossal Collision relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Flare of Cultivation relevance 0.14 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Hunter's Edge relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Unnatural Restoration relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Deconstruct relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Natural Order relevance 0.12 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.10 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Felling Blow relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.11 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.09 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.08 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.09 · 11.3% (9 of 80 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.13 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.09 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Hard-Hitting Question relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.07 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
All utility lands (38)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.23 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.23 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.16 · 33.8% (27 of 80 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.22 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.11 · 56.3% (45 of 80 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.15 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.16 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.11 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.13 · 8.8% (7 of 80 decks)
- Zanarkand, Ancient Metropolis // Lasting Fayth relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Cave of Temptation relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.10 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Hall of Oracles relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Lair of the Hydra relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.12 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.10 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.09 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.11 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Escape Tunnel relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.09 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Fountainport relevance 0.12 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.08 · 10.0% (8 of 80 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.08 · 5.0% (4 of 80 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.11 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.08 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.09 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Gingerbread Cabin relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.07 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Shifting Woodland relevance 0.06 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.05 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All lands (20)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.11 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Evendo, Waking Haven relevance 0.10 · 7.5% (6 of 80 decks)
- Gaea's Cradle relevance 0.10 · 6.3% (5 of 80 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.10 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.08 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Vibrant Cityscape relevance 0.09 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.07 · 3.8% (3 of 80 decks)
- Brokers Hideout relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 0.08 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (2 of 80 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 92.5% (74 of 80 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Bushmaster, Coiled Henchman, from 80 real Commander decks.