Wall of Shards
Played in 146 Esper decks
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Esper
All commanders (2)
- Bane, Lord of Darkness relevance 2.66 · 3.0% (33 of 1,103 decks)
- Lady Evangela relevance 0.43 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.90 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Tainted Remedy relevance 1.25 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Benevolent Offering relevance 0.99 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 0.90 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.89 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Congregate relevance 0.87 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.78 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.76 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Flumph relevance 0.74 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 0.71 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 0.67 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 0.66 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.65 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Beacon of Immortality relevance 0.63 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Drivnod, Carnage Dominus relevance 0.62 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Heliod's Intervention relevance 0.60 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 0.59 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.58 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Luminate Primordial relevance 0.57 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Angel of Destiny relevance 0.56 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Wall of Blood relevance 0.55 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Mister Negative relevance 0.53 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.52 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Vizkopa Guildmage relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.50 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Wall of Reverence relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 0.46 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.45 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Teysa Karlov relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.90 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 0.90 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.76 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Flumph relevance 0.74 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 0.71 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Hunted Horror relevance 0.66 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 0.65 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Drivnod, Carnage Dominus relevance 0.62 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Luminous Broodmoth relevance 0.59 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 0.58 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Luminate Primordial relevance 0.57 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Angel of Destiny relevance 0.56 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Wall of Blood relevance 0.55 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Mister Negative relevance 0.53 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Vizkopa Guildmage relevance 0.51 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.50 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Wall of Reverence relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Liesa, Forgotten Archangel relevance 0.46 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Teysa Karlov relevance 0.44 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Nyx-Fleece Ram relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Blizzard Specter relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Wedding Ring relevance 0.78 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.52 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.44 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.41 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Tainted Remedy relevance 1.25 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 0.67 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Phyrexian Reclamation relevance 0.45 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.44 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.43 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Paradox Haze relevance 0.43 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Oath of Lieges relevance 0.42 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Greater Auramancy relevance 0.41 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Karmic Justice relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
All instants (5)
- Benevolent Offering relevance 0.99 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Condemn relevance 0.89 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Congregate relevance 0.87 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Beacon of Immortality relevance 0.63 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Heliod's Intervention relevance 0.60 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.42 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
All lands (9)
- Dark Depths relevance 0.83 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.55 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Boreal Shelf relevance 0.54 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.53 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.52 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Shimmerdrift Vale relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Glacial Floodplain relevance 0.48 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Ice Tunnel relevance 0.46 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Snowfield Sinkhole relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Shards: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 146 real decks.