Wall of Shards
Played in 204 Five-Color decks
Color Identity Spread
2.8% Five-Color
30+23+6+8+4+6+3+
All most relevant (30)
- Tainted Remedy relevance 1.50 · 24.0% (49 of 204 decks)
- Beacon of Immortality relevance 1.44 · 22.1% (45 of 204 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 1.11 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.08 · 17.6% (36 of 204 decks)
- Condemn relevance 1.03 · 15.7% (32 of 204 decks)
- Kwain, Itinerant Meddler relevance 1.01 · 19.6% (40 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 0.95 · 19.6% (40 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.95 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 0.94 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 0.94 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Flumph relevance 0.89 · 14.7% (30 of 204 decks)
- Heliod's Intervention relevance 0.89 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.88 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 0.86 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Arcades, the Strategist relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 0.79 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 0.78 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Humble Defector relevance 0.76 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Angel of Destiny relevance 0.74 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Vizkopa Guildmage relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Felothar the Steadfast relevance 0.71 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.70 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.69 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- High Alert relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.69 · 14.7% (30 of 204 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.68 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Happily Ever After relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Pramikon, Sky Rampart relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Wall of Denial relevance 1.08 · 17.6% (36 of 204 decks)
- Kwain, Itinerant Meddler relevance 1.01 · 19.6% (40 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Gluntch, the Bestower relevance 0.95 · 19.6% (40 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.95 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 0.94 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 0.94 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Flumph relevance 0.89 · 14.7% (30 of 204 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 0.86 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Arcades, the Strategist relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 0.79 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 0.78 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Humble Defector relevance 0.76 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Angel of Destiny relevance 0.74 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Vizkopa Guildmage relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Felothar the Steadfast relevance 0.71 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Pramikon, Sky Rampart relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Kynaios and Tiro of Meletis relevance 0.64 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Selvala, Explorer Returned relevance 0.59 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Master of Ceremonies relevance 0.58 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Kami of the Crescent Moon relevance 0.58 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Zirda, the Dawnwaker relevance 0.56 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 0.56 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Wedding Ring relevance 1.11 · 22.5% (46 of 204 decks)
- Howling Mine relevance 0.68 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Temple Bell relevance 0.62 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Ghirapur Orrery relevance 0.61 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Helm of Awakening relevance 0.60 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (20 of 204 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Tainted Remedy relevance 1.50 · 24.0% (49 of 204 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.88 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.70 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- High Alert relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Happily Ever After relevance 0.67 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 0.65 · 14.7% (30 of 204 decks)
- Braid of Fire relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (19 of 204 decks)
- Jaws of Defeat relevance 0.57 · 8.8% (18 of 204 decks)
All instants (4)
- Beacon of Immortality relevance 1.44 · 22.1% (45 of 204 decks)
- Condemn relevance 1.03 · 15.7% (32 of 204 decks)
- Heliod's Intervention relevance 0.89 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
- Everybody Lives! relevance 0.57 · 11.8% (24 of 204 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Collective Voyage relevance 0.69 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (22 of 204 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.69 · 14.7% (30 of 204 decks)
- Tempt with Discovery relevance 0.62 · 19.1% (39 of 204 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.59 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Minds Aglow relevance 0.57 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
All lands (3)
- Grove of the Burnwillows relevance 1.09 · 20.1% (41 of 204 decks)
- Rainbow Vale relevance 0.68 · 10.3% (21 of 204 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.68 · 24.0% (49 of 204 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Shards: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 204 real decks.















































