Clairvoyance
Played in 505 Blue decks
2930+2+35+13+
Color Identity Spread
26.4% Blue
Commanders
Octavia, Living Thesis 3.4% of decks
Octavia, Living Thesis 3.4% of decks
Talrand, Sky Summoner 2.3% of decks
Talrand, Sky Summoner 2.3% of decks
Katara, Waterbending Master 2.4% of decks
Katara, Waterbending Master 2.4% of decks
God-Eternal Kefnet 2.2% of decks
God-Eternal Kefnet 2.2% of decks
Geralf, the Fleshwright 1.2% of decks
Geralf, the Fleshwright 1.2% of decks
Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time 1.3% of decks
Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time 1.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Peek 55.4% of decks
Peek 55.4% of decks
Obsessive Search 31.9% of decks
Obsessive Search 31.9% of decks
Disrupt 25.0% of decks
Disrupt 25.0% of decks
Reach Through Mists 21.4% of decks
Reach Through Mists 21.4% of decks
Opt 74.1% of decks
Opt 74.1% of decks
Consider 57.0% of decks
Consider 57.0% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (29)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 1.97 · 3.4% (58 of 1,698 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 1.82 · 2.3% (80 of 3,527 decks)
- Katara, Waterbending Master relevance 1.73 · 2.4% (59 of 2,451 decks)
- God-Eternal Kefnet relevance 0.80 · 2.2% (6 of 267 decks)
- Geralf, the Fleshwright relevance 0.76 · 1.2% (11 of 949 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.71 · 1.3% (8 of 622 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.68 · 3.6% (3 of 83 decks)
- Hydro-Man, Fluid Felon relevance 0.60 · 1.7% (4 of 230 decks)
- Saruman the White relevance 0.55 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)
- Ruric Thar, Biomagus relevance 0.54 · 1.9% (3 of 154 decks)
- Wiccan, Rising Magician relevance 0.53 · 1.9% (3 of 161 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.51 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Kaho, Minamo Historian relevance 0.50 · 1.2% (4 of 339 decks)
- Syr Elenora, the Discerning relevance 0.49 · 1.1% (4 of 354 decks)
- The Wondrous Wasp relevance 0.46 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- April O'Neil, Human Element relevance 0.45 · 1.3% (3 of 231 decks)
- Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.43 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Gustha Ebbasdotter relevance 0.40 · 1.6% (2 of 122 decks)
- Gandalf, Wandering Wizard relevance 0.34 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.33 · 1.1% (2 of 177 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.32 · 3.1% (1 of 32 decks)
- Gadwick, the Wizened relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (2 of 186 decks)
- Spider-Man 2099, Miguel O'Hara relevance 0.31 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Heidar, Rimewind Master relevance 0.26 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Vendilion Clique relevance 0.22 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
- James, Wandering Dad // Follow Him relevance 0.22 · 1.2% (1 of 82 decks)
- Higure, the Still Wind relevance 0.22 · 1.2% (1 of 84 decks)
- Stature, Size Shifter relevance 0.20 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.20 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Peek relevance 1.97 · 55.4% (280 of 505 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 1.40 · 31.9% (161 of 505 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.15 · 25.0% (126 of 505 decks)
- Reach Through Mists relevance 1.13 · 21.4% (108 of 505 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.12 · 74.1% (374 of 505 decks)
- Consider relevance 1.11 · 57.0% (288 of 505 decks)
- Sapphire Charm relevance 1.10 · 20.8% (105 of 505 decks)
- Quicken relevance 1.08 · 23.8% (120 of 505 decks)
- Sorcerous Sight relevance 1.07 · 18.0% (91 of 505 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.93 · 21.6% (109 of 505 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.91 · 31.1% (157 of 505 decks)
- Ray of Erasure relevance 0.87 · 14.5% (73 of 505 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.85 · 24.4% (123 of 505 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.83 · 22.4% (113 of 505 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.83 · 24.6% (124 of 505 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.77 · 19.2% (97 of 505 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.74 · 22.2% (112 of 505 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.73 · 31.5% (159 of 505 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.69 · 26.5% (134 of 505 decks)
- Whispers of the Muse relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (60 of 505 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.64 · 19.6% (99 of 505 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.61 · 19.0% (96 of 505 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.61 · 39.6% (200 of 505 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.59 · 14.9% (75 of 505 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.59 · 18.2% (92 of 505 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.55 · 21.6% (109 of 505 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.55 · 41.6% (210 of 505 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.55 · 18.8% (95 of 505 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.54 · 13.9% (70 of 505 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.53 · 12.7% (64 of 505 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.55 · 21.6% (109 of 505 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.45 · 26.7% (135 of 505 decks)
All instants (35)
- Peek relevance 1.97 · 55.4% (280 of 505 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 1.40 · 31.9% (161 of 505 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.15 · 25.0% (126 of 505 decks)
- Reach Through Mists relevance 1.13 · 21.4% (108 of 505 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.12 · 74.1% (374 of 505 decks)
- Consider relevance 1.11 · 57.0% (288 of 505 decks)
- Sapphire Charm relevance 1.10 · 20.8% (105 of 505 decks)
- Quicken relevance 1.08 · 23.8% (120 of 505 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.91 · 31.1% (157 of 505 decks)
- Ray of Erasure relevance 0.87 · 14.5% (73 of 505 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.85 · 24.4% (123 of 505 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.83 · 22.4% (113 of 505 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.83 · 24.6% (124 of 505 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.77 · 19.2% (97 of 505 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.74 · 22.2% (112 of 505 decks)
- Whispers of the Muse relevance 0.67 · 11.9% (60 of 505 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.61 · 19.0% (96 of 505 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.59 · 14.9% (75 of 505 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.59 · 18.2% (92 of 505 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.53 · 12.7% (64 of 505 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.53 · 22.0% (111 of 505 decks)
- Mental Note relevance 0.53 · 11.1% (56 of 505 decks)
- Confound relevance 0.52 · 10.5% (53 of 505 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.52 · 16.2% (82 of 505 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.52 · 13.1% (66 of 505 decks)
- Tune the Narrative relevance 0.52 · 8.9% (45 of 505 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.51 · 12.3% (62 of 505 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.50 · 19.2% (97 of 505 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 0.49 · 7.1% (36 of 505 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.48 · 12.9% (65 of 505 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.47 · 28.3% (143 of 505 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.47 · 12.5% (63 of 505 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.43 · 11.7% (59 of 505 decks)
- Telling Time relevance 0.43 · 9.3% (47 of 505 decks)
- Intervene relevance 0.43 · 7.3% (37 of 505 decks)
All sorceries (13)
- Sorcerous Sight relevance 1.07 · 18.0% (91 of 505 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.93 · 21.6% (109 of 505 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.73 · 31.5% (159 of 505 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.69 · 26.5% (134 of 505 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.64 · 19.6% (99 of 505 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.61 · 39.6% (200 of 505 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.55 · 41.6% (210 of 505 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.55 · 18.8% (95 of 505 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.54 · 13.9% (70 of 505 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (76 of 505 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.52 · 10.9% (55 of 505 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 0.43 · 8.9% (45 of 505 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.42 · 13.3% (67 of 505 decks)
EDH data for Clairvoyance: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 505 real decks.





















































