Color Identity Spread
2.9% Simic
- Golgari 2,454 · 63.2%
- Green 657 · 16.9%
- Sultai 366 · 9.4%
- Simic 113 · 2.9%
- Other (16) 295 · 7.6%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (3)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 2.20 · 1.6% (27 of 1,678 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.81 · 1.1% (3 of 281 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.47 · 1.8% (1 of 57 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.49 · 58.4% (66 of 113 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.22 · 72.6% (82 of 113 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.81 · 38.1% (43 of 113 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.70 · 42.5% (48 of 113 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.62 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.55 · 41.6% (47 of 113 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.49 · 38.1% (43 of 113 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 1.47 · 38.1% (43 of 113 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.43 · 50.4% (57 of 113 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 1.33 · 37.2% (42 of 113 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.30 · 42.5% (48 of 113 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.25 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.25 · 32.7% (37 of 113 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 1.23 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 1.20 · 31.9% (36 of 113 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.20 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.18 · 50.4% (57 of 113 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.15 · 31.0% (35 of 113 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 1.11 · 27.4% (31 of 113 decks)
- Woodland Weavemaster relevance 1.07 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 1.06 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.05 · 18.6% (21 of 113 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.04 · 18.6% (21 of 113 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 1.02 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 1.00 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.99 · 17.7% (20 of 113 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.99 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.97 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.97 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.97 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
All creatures (43)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 2.49 · 58.4% (66 of 113 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.22 · 72.6% (82 of 113 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.81 · 38.1% (43 of 113 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.70 · 42.5% (48 of 113 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.62 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.55 · 41.6% (47 of 113 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.49 · 38.1% (43 of 113 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 1.47 · 38.1% (43 of 113 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 1.43 · 50.4% (57 of 113 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 1.33 · 37.2% (42 of 113 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.30 · 42.5% (48 of 113 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.25 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 1.23 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 1.20 · 31.9% (36 of 113 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.20 · 25.7% (29 of 113 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.18 · 50.4% (57 of 113 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.15 · 31.0% (35 of 113 decks)
- Woodland Weavemaster relevance 1.07 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
- Legolas, Counter of Kills relevance 1.06 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.05 · 18.6% (21 of 113 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.04 · 18.6% (21 of 113 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 1.00 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.99 · 17.7% (20 of 113 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.99 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.97 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.97 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.97 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.91 · 22.1% (25 of 113 decks)
- Mirkwood Trapper relevance 0.90 · 20.4% (23 of 113 decks)
- Mirkwood Pathmaker relevance 0.90 · 17.7% (20 of 113 decks)
- Thranduil's Company relevance 0.89 · 21.2% (24 of 113 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.88 · 15.9% (18 of 113 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.87 · 17.7% (20 of 113 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.85 · 15.0% (17 of 113 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.85 · 13.3% (15 of 113 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.85 · 56.6% (64 of 113 decks)
- Silvan Reveler relevance 0.83 · 16.8% (19 of 113 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.81 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.81 · 23.9% (27 of 113 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.81 · 17.7% (20 of 113 decks)
- Elven Raft-Steerer relevance 0.79 · 18.6% (21 of 113 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.76 · 24.8% (28 of 113 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.76 · 18.6% (21 of 113 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.79 · 17.7% (20 of 113 decks)
All instants (3)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 1.25 · 32.7% (37 of 113 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 1.11 · 27.4% (31 of 113 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.79 · 14.2% (16 of 113 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Elven Farsight relevance 1.02 · 29.2% (33 of 113 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 0.80 · 14.2% (16 of 113 decks)
All lands (1)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.75 · 16.8% (19 of 113 decks)
EDH data for Numa, Joraga Chieftain: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 113 real decks.