Elvish Herder
Played in 146 Simic decks
130+44+5+1+
Color Identity Spread
6.5% Simic
Commanders
Most Relevant
Shuko 17.1% of decks
Shuko 17.1% of decks
Arbor Elf 38.4% of decks
Arbor Elf 38.4% of decks
Seeker of Skybreak 21.2% of decks
Seeker of Skybreak 21.2% of decks
Elvish Mystic 67.8% of decks
Elvish Mystic 67.8% of decks
Fyndhorn Elves 50.0% of decks
Fyndhorn Elves 50.0% of decks
Llanowar Elves 76.7% of decks
Llanowar Elves 76.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Thranduil, Sindarin Liege // Silvan Rally relevance 1.70 · 1.2% (20 of 1,708 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Shuko relevance 1.14 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.11 · 38.4% (56 of 146 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.05 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.01 · 67.8% (99 of 146 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.01 · 50.0% (73 of 146 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.97 · 76.7% (112 of 146 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.92 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.92 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.88 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.83 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.82 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.81 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.78 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.76 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.75 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.74 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.74 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.71 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.66 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.65 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.63 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.62 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.59 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.57 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.56 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.55 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.54 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.54 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
All creatures (44)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.11 · 38.4% (56 of 146 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.05 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.01 · 67.8% (99 of 146 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.01 · 50.0% (73 of 146 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.97 · 76.7% (112 of 146 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.92 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.92 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.88 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.83 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.82 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 0.81 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.78 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.75 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.74 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.74 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 0.71 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Aphetto Alchemist relevance 0.66 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.65 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.63 · 26.7% (39 of 146 decks)
- Deepwood Denizen relevance 0.62 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.61 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Birchlore Rangers relevance 0.59 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.57 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.56 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.55 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.54 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.54 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Cloakwood Swarmkeeper relevance 0.54 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Unctus, Grand Metatect relevance 0.53 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Mirkwood Nurturer relevance 0.53 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.53 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.53 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.53 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elder relevance 0.53 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.52 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.50 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.50 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 0.50 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.49 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Pollenbright Druid relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Boughside Wanderers relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Elfsworn Giant relevance 0.46 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.46 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Shuko relevance 1.14 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.76 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.53 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.49 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Adventuring Gear relevance 0.47 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 0.59 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
EDH data for Elvish Herder: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 146 real decks.






















