Tangletrap
Played in 156 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (11)
- Kura, the Boundless Sky relevance 1.33 · 1.9% (8 of 414 decks)
- Wolverine, Claws Out relevance 1.01 · 2.2% (4 of 185 decks)
- Bartz and Boko relevance 0.71 · 2.4% (2 of 85 decks)
- Multani, Yavimaya's Avatar relevance 0.69 · 1.1% (3 of 281 decks)
- Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.56 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.54 · 1.0% (2 of 194 decks)
- Arashi, the Sky Asunder relevance 0.52 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.50 · 3.6% (1 of 28 decks)
- Karvanista, Loyal Lupari // Lupari Shield relevance 0.49 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.39 · 1.5% (1 of 65 decks)
- Bosco, Just a Bear relevance 0.37 · 1.3% (1 of 77 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.98 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 0.75 · 13.5% (21 of 156 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.74 · 33.3% (52 of 156 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.73 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.66 · 21.8% (34 of 156 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.58 · 17.9% (28 of 156 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.49 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.46 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.45 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.45 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.44 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Crushing Vines relevance 0.43 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Choose Your Weapon relevance 0.42 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Big Play relevance 0.41 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.39 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Strength of the Pack relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.37 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.37 · 27.6% (43 of 156 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Fog of War relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Retrieve relevance 0.36 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Sarkhan's Resolve relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.35 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.35 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Nature's Embrace relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.39 · 11.5% (18 of 156 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Dormant Grove // Gnarled Grovestrider relevance 0.37 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.35 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Scaretiller relevance 0.35 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Flesh Burrower relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.33 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.33 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.37 · 27.6% (43 of 156 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.45 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Nature's Embrace relevance 0.35 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
All instants (23)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.98 · 25.6% (40 of 156 decks)
- Crushing Canopy relevance 0.75 · 13.5% (21 of 156 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.74 · 33.3% (52 of 156 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.73 · 14.1% (22 of 156 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.66 · 21.8% (34 of 156 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.58 · 17.9% (28 of 156 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.46 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Wilt relevance 0.45 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Crushing Vines relevance 0.43 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Choose Your Weapon relevance 0.42 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (16 of 156 decks)
- Big Play relevance 0.41 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (23 of 156 decks)
- Airship Crash relevance 0.38 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Fog of War relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Sarkhan's Resolve relevance 0.36 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Glorious Decay relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.35 · 19.2% (30 of 156 decks)
- Aerial Predation relevance 0.34 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Mystic Repeal relevance 0.33 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
- Blinding Fog relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.32 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
All sorceries (14)
- Explore relevance 0.49 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.44 · 29.5% (46 of 156 decks)
- Adventurous Impulse relevance 0.44 · 9.6% (15 of 156 decks)
- Strength of the Pack relevance 0.37 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.37 · 15.4% (24 of 156 decks)
- Retrieve relevance 0.36 · 5.8% (9 of 156 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.35 · 10.9% (17 of 156 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.35 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.34 · 8.3% (13 of 156 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (11 of 156 decks)
- Field Trip relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (8 of 156 decks)
- Restorative Technique relevance 0.32 · 6.4% (10 of 156 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (12 of 156 decks)
All lands (2)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.32 · 17.3% (27 of 156 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.32 · 12.2% (19 of 156 decks)
EDH data for Tangletrap: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 156 real decks.