Dusk Mangler
Played in 265 Sultai decks
230+41+2+1+3+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
4.1% Sultai
Commanders
Most Relevant
Ravenous Chupacabra 38.5% of decks
Ravenous Chupacabra 38.5% of decks
Vile Mutilator 16.6% of decks
Vile Mutilator 16.6% of decks
Massacre Wurm 30.6% of decks
Massacre Wurm 30.6% of decks
Coiling Oracle 31.3% of decks
Coiling Oracle 31.3% of decks
Ghostly Flicker 26.4% of decks
Ghostly Flicker 26.4% of decks
Conjurer's Closet 21.5% of decks
Conjurer's Closet 21.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 2.57 · 1.8% (130 of 7,359 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.83 · 2.7% (3 of 113 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 1.30 · 38.5% (102 of 265 decks)
- Vile Mutilator relevance 1.11 · 16.6% (44 of 265 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 1.05 · 30.6% (81 of 265 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.95 · 31.3% (83 of 265 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.93 · 26.4% (70 of 265 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.86 · 21.5% (57 of 265 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.84 · 27.9% (74 of 265 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.84 · 29.1% (77 of 265 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.79 · 24.2% (64 of 265 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.78 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.76 · 18.9% (50 of 265 decks)
- Gray Merchant of Asphodel relevance 0.73 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Sepulchral Primordial relevance 0.73 · 16.6% (44 of 265 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.71 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.71 · 31.7% (84 of 265 decks)
- Malboro relevance 0.69 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 0.68 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.68 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Noxious Gearhulk relevance 0.67 · 21.5% (57 of 265 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 0.65 · 18.5% (49 of 265 decks)
- Coiling Rebirth relevance 0.64 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.64 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Archon of Cruelty relevance 0.63 · 15.5% (41 of 265 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.61 · 17.0% (45 of 265 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.59 · 21.5% (57 of 265 decks)
- Sludge Monster relevance 0.58 · 9.8% (26 of 265 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.58 · 29.8% (79 of 265 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.58 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Intellect Devourer relevance 0.57 · 8.7% (23 of 265 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Ravenous Chupacabra relevance 1.30 · 38.5% (102 of 265 decks)
- Vile Mutilator relevance 1.11 · 16.6% (44 of 265 decks)
- Massacre Wurm relevance 1.05 · 30.6% (81 of 265 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.95 · 31.3% (83 of 265 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.84 · 29.1% (77 of 265 decks)
- Solemn Simulacrum relevance 0.79 · 24.2% (64 of 265 decks)
- Risen Reef relevance 0.76 · 18.9% (50 of 265 decks)
- Gray Merchant of Asphodel relevance 0.73 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Sepulchral Primordial relevance 0.73 · 16.6% (44 of 265 decks)
- Baleful Strix relevance 0.71 · 31.7% (84 of 265 decks)
- Malboro relevance 0.69 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Mind Flayer relevance 0.68 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.68 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Noxious Gearhulk relevance 0.67 · 21.5% (57 of 265 decks)
- Foundation Breaker relevance 0.66 · 15.1% (40 of 265 decks)
- Shriekmaw relevance 0.65 · 18.5% (49 of 265 decks)
- Aether Channeler relevance 0.64 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Archon of Cruelty relevance 0.63 · 15.5% (41 of 265 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.61 · 17.0% (45 of 265 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.59 · 21.5% (57 of 265 decks)
- Sludge Monster relevance 0.58 · 9.8% (26 of 265 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.58 · 29.8% (79 of 265 decks)
- Overlord of the Hauntwoods relevance 0.58 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Intellect Devourer relevance 0.57 · 8.7% (23 of 265 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 0.57 · 12.5% (33 of 265 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (39 of 265 decks)
- Overlord of the Floodpits relevance 0.56 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.56 · 17.0% (45 of 265 decks)
- Topiary Stomper relevance 0.56 · 12.1% (32 of 265 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.56 · 25.7% (68 of 265 decks)
- Titan of Industry relevance 0.55 · 10.6% (28 of 265 decks)
- Fangkeeper's Familiar relevance 0.55 · 14.3% (38 of 265 decks)
- Druid of Purification relevance 0.53 · 11.7% (31 of 265 decks)
- Diluvian Primordial relevance 0.52 · 10.9% (29 of 265 decks)
- Clifftop Lookout relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (36 of 265 decks)
- Uro, Titan of Nature's Wrath relevance 0.51 · 19.2% (51 of 265 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.49 · 31.7% (84 of 265 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.47 · 18.9% (50 of 265 decks)
- Hostage Taker relevance 0.47 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.46 · 10.2% (27 of 265 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.86 · 21.5% (57 of 265 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.84 · 27.9% (74 of 265 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
All instants (3)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.93 · 26.4% (70 of 265 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.78 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.71 · 17.4% (46 of 265 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Coiling Rebirth relevance 0.64 · 13.2% (35 of 265 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.50 · 29.8% (79 of 265 decks)
All lands (1)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.53 · 37.0% (98 of 265 decks)
EDH data for Dusk Mangler: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 265 real decks.




























