Primal Frenzy
Played in 229 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
36.2% Green
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (18)
- Yorvo, Lord of Garenbrig relevance 1.69 · 2.8% (15 of 538 decks)
- Kosei, Penitent Warlord relevance 1.18 · 1.0% (14 of 1,336 decks)
- Autumn Willow relevance 1.11 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Hit-Monkey relevance 1.05 · 1.3% (8 of 607 decks)
- Thrun, the Last Troll relevance 1.01 · 1.7% (6 of 355 decks)
- Grunn, the Lonely King relevance 0.86 · 1.4% (5 of 368 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.72 · 3.6% (2 of 55 decks)
- Medusa, Inhuman Queen relevance 0.61 · 2.0% (2 of 99 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.57 · 1.7% (2 of 119 decks)
- Zuo Ci, the Mocking Sage relevance 0.55 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Go-Shintai of Boundless Vigor relevance 0.54 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Flatman relevance 0.52 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.48 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Rick Jones, Destined Sidekick relevance 0.45 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Timmy, Power Gamer relevance 0.40 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
- Anthousa, Setessan Hero relevance 0.35 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
- Surrak, Elusive Hunter relevance 0.32 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
- Ka-Zar of the Savage Land relevance 0.32 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rancor relevance 1.03 · 40.6% (93 of 229 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 1.02 · 20.1% (46 of 229 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.97 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.96 · 19.7% (45 of 229 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.89 · 18.8% (43 of 229 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.83 · 14.4% (33 of 229 decks)
- Fists of Ironwood relevance 0.78 · 16.2% (37 of 229 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.73 · 16.6% (38 of 229 decks)
- Werebear relevance 0.63 · 21.0% (48 of 229 decks)
- Carapace relevance 0.62 · 9.2% (21 of 229 decks)
- Predatory Urge relevance 0.62 · 9.6% (22 of 229 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 0.62 · 18.3% (42 of 229 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.61 · 12.2% (28 of 229 decks)
- Awaken the Bear relevance 0.60 · 11.8% (27 of 229 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.59 · 21.8% (50 of 229 decks)
- Golden Bear relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (29 of 229 decks)
- Wose Pathfinder relevance 0.58 · 10.9% (25 of 229 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (37 of 229 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Savage Swipe relevance 0.56 · 10.9% (25 of 229 decks)
- Savage Punch relevance 0.55 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
- Grizzly Fate relevance 0.55 · 14.8% (34 of 229 decks)
- Striped Bears relevance 0.55 · 14.0% (32 of 229 decks)
- Expand the Sphere relevance 0.55 · 12.2% (28 of 229 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 0.54 · 9.6% (22 of 229 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.54 · 13.5% (31 of 229 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.53 · 22.3% (51 of 229 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.53 · 14.4% (33 of 229 decks)
- Golden Hind relevance 0.52 · 8.7% (20 of 229 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 0.51 · 14.4% (33 of 229 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Werebear relevance 0.63 · 21.0% (48 of 229 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 0.62 · 18.3% (42 of 229 decks)
- Golden Bear relevance 0.58 · 12.7% (29 of 229 decks)
- Wose Pathfinder relevance 0.58 · 10.9% (25 of 229 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 0.57 · 16.2% (37 of 229 decks)
- Striped Bears relevance 0.55 · 14.0% (32 of 229 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 0.53 · 14.4% (33 of 229 decks)
- Golden Hind relevance 0.52 · 8.7% (20 of 229 decks)
- Bear Cub relevance 0.51 · 14.4% (33 of 229 decks)
- Mother Bear relevance 0.50 · 15.3% (35 of 229 decks)
- Balduvian Bears relevance 0.50 · 13.5% (31 of 229 decks)
- Ulvenwald Bear relevance 0.49 · 12.2% (28 of 229 decks)
- River Bear relevance 0.49 · 11.8% (27 of 229 decks)
- Ashcoat Bear relevance 0.49 · 14.4% (33 of 229 decks)
- Drover Grizzly relevance 0.49 · 12.2% (28 of 229 decks)
- Dragon-Scarred Bear relevance 0.49 · 12.2% (28 of 229 decks)
- Vivien's Grizzly relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
All enchantments (24)
- Rancor relevance 1.03 · 40.6% (93 of 229 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 1.02 · 20.1% (46 of 229 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.97 · 23.1% (53 of 229 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.96 · 19.7% (45 of 229 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.89 · 18.8% (43 of 229 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.83 · 14.4% (33 of 229 decks)
- Fists of Ironwood relevance 0.78 · 16.2% (37 of 229 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.73 · 16.6% (38 of 229 decks)
- Carapace relevance 0.62 · 9.2% (21 of 229 decks)
- Predatory Urge relevance 0.62 · 9.6% (22 of 229 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.61 · 12.2% (28 of 229 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 0.54 · 9.6% (22 of 229 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.54 · 13.5% (31 of 229 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.53 · 22.3% (51 of 229 decks)
- Dryad's Favor relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (20 of 229 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.49 · 16.6% (38 of 229 decks)
- Bearscape relevance 0.49 · 13.1% (30 of 229 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.49 · 10.0% (23 of 229 decks)
- Ferocity relevance 0.48 · 7.0% (16 of 229 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.48 · 20.5% (47 of 229 decks)
- Primal Rage relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.48 · 9.2% (21 of 229 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.48 · 12.2% (28 of 229 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.47 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
All instants (4)
- Awaken the Bear relevance 0.60 · 11.8% (27 of 229 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.56 · 17.5% (40 of 229 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.50 · 28.4% (65 of 229 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 0.47 · 9.6% (22 of 229 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Overrun relevance 0.59 · 21.8% (50 of 229 decks)
- Savage Swipe relevance 0.56 · 10.9% (25 of 229 decks)
- Savage Punch relevance 0.55 · 11.4% (26 of 229 decks)
- Grizzly Fate relevance 0.55 · 14.8% (34 of 229 decks)
- Expand the Sphere relevance 0.55 · 12.2% (28 of 229 decks)
EDH data for Primal Frenzy: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 229 real decks.