Primal Frenzy
Played in 67 Gruul decks
430+2+38+5+2+3+
Color Identity Spread
10.6% Gruul
Commanders
Kaima, the Fractured Calm 1.5% of decks
Kaima, the Fractured Calm 1.5% of decks
Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Alena, Kessig Trapper 13.3% of decks
Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Alena, Kessig Trapper 13.3% of decks
Meet and Greet "Sisay" 4.8% of decks
Meet and Greet "Sisay" 4.8% of decks
Skanos Dragonheart // Tavern Brawler 4.3% of decks
Skanos Dragonheart // Tavern Brawler 4.3% of decks
Most Relevant
Audacity 43.3% of decks
Audacity 43.3% of decks
Messenger's Speed 26.9% of decks
Messenger's Speed 26.9% of decks
Talons of Wildwood 19.4% of decks
Talons of Wildwood 19.4% of decks
Frog Tongue 20.9% of decks
Frog Tongue 20.9% of decks
Rancor 41.8% of decks
Rancor 41.8% of decks
Bequeathal 22.4% of decks
Bequeathal 22.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Kaima, the Fractured Calm relevance 1.94 · 1.5% (14 of 962 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 1.24 · 13.3% (2 of 15 decks)
- Meet and Greet "Sisay" relevance 1.03 · 4.8% (2 of 42 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Tavern Brawler relevance 0.64 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Audacity relevance 1.87 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Messenger's Speed relevance 1.68 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 1.24 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 1.19 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.19 · 41.8% (28 of 67 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 1.10 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 1.09 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Dragon Mantle relevance 0.99 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.89 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Fists of Ironwood relevance 0.88 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.87 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Demonic Ruckus relevance 0.87 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Mark of Fury relevance 0.87 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.83 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Whip Silk relevance 0.80 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Laccolith Rig relevance 0.79 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.71 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.71 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Crown of Flames relevance 0.69 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Sluggishness relevance 0.69 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.66 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.66 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.65 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.64 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Footfall Crater relevance 0.62 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Runes of the Deus relevance 0.62 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.58 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.57 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Sticky Fingers relevance 0.57 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.57 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
All creatures (2)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.54 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Red XIII, Proud Warrior relevance 0.47 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
All enchantments (38)
- Audacity relevance 1.87 · 43.3% (29 of 67 decks)
- Messenger's Speed relevance 1.68 · 26.9% (18 of 67 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 1.24 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 1.19 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.19 · 41.8% (28 of 67 decks)
- Bequeathal relevance 1.10 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 1.09 · 22.4% (15 of 67 decks)
- Dragon Mantle relevance 0.99 · 20.9% (14 of 67 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.89 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Fists of Ironwood relevance 0.88 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.87 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Demonic Ruckus relevance 0.87 · 19.4% (13 of 67 decks)
- Mark of Fury relevance 0.87 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 0.83 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Whip Silk relevance 0.80 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Laccolith Rig relevance 0.79 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.71 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.71 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Crown of Flames relevance 0.69 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Sluggishness relevance 0.69 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.66 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.66 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.65 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.64 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Footfall Crater relevance 0.62 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Runes of the Deus relevance 0.62 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.58 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.57 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Sticky Fingers relevance 0.57 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.57 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.55 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.51 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.48 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 0.46 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.45 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.44 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.43 · 16.4% (11 of 67 decks)
All instants (5)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.51 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.40 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.39 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.35 · 11.9% (8 of 67 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.29 · 14.9% (10 of 67 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Skarrg, the Rage Pits relevance 0.44 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.43 · 31.3% (21 of 67 decks)
All lands (3)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.55 · 23.9% (16 of 67 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.42 · 13.4% (9 of 67 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.32 · 17.9% (12 of 67 decks)
EDH data for Primal Frenzy: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 67 real decks.




























