Sift
Played in 78 Sultai decks
30+15+4+13+6+3+9+
Color Identity Spread
Most Relevant
Frantic Search 29.5% of decks
Frantic Search 29.5% of decks
Pilfered Plans 10.3% of decks
Pilfered Plans 10.3% of decks
Sky Diamond 10.3% of decks
Sky Diamond 10.3% of decks
Commander's Sphere 17.9% of decks
Commander's Sphere 17.9% of decks
Grapple with the Past 20.5% of decks
Grapple with the Past 20.5% of decks
Disdainful Stroke 11.5% of decks
Disdainful Stroke 11.5% of decks
All most relevant (30)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.73 · 29.5% (23 of 78 decks)
- Pilfered Plans relevance 0.63 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.60 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.57 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.54 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.53 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.51 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 0.49 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.49 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Steward of the Harvest relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Deathsprout relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.47 · 28.2% (22 of 78 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Afterlife from the Loam relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Lethal Scheme relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Umbral Collar Zealot relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Diviner of Mist relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.42 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.40 · 24.4% (19 of 78 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.40 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Fangkeeper's Familiar relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.39 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Jarad, Golgari Lich Lord relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.39 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.38 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.38 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.36 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.36 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Steward of the Harvest relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Umbral Collar Zealot relevance 0.43 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Diviner of Mist relevance 0.43 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Wonder relevance 0.42 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.40 · 24.4% (19 of 78 decks)
- Lord of Extinction relevance 0.40 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Fangkeeper's Familiar relevance 0.39 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Jarad, Golgari Lich Lord relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.38 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.36 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Colossal Grave-Reaver relevance 0.36 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
- Shigeki, Jukai Visionary relevance 0.35 · 12.8% (10 of 78 decks)
- Ob Nixilis, the Fallen relevance 0.34 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.60 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.57 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
- Conduit of Worlds relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.35 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
All instants (13)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.73 · 29.5% (23 of 78 decks)
- Grapple with the Past relevance 0.54 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.53 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.51 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 0.49 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.49 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Deathsprout relevance 0.48 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Lethal Scheme relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Grisly Salvage relevance 0.39 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Harrow relevance 0.39 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.38 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.35 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.35 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Pilfered Plans relevance 0.63 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.47 · 28.2% (22 of 78 decks)
- Afterlife from the Loam relevance 0.44 · 15.4% (12 of 78 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (8 of 78 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.36 · 17.9% (14 of 78 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.51 · 14.1% (11 of 78 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.48 · 29.5% (23 of 78 decks)
- Memorial to Folly relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
All lands (9)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.60 · 39.7% (31 of 78 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.59 · 20.5% (16 of 78 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.58 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.57 · 39.7% (31 of 78 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.48 · 16.7% (13 of 78 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.40 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.39 · 11.5% (9 of 78 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.34 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.34 · 19.2% (15 of 78 decks)
EDH data for Sift: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 78 real decks.












































