Give // Take
Played in 64 Witch-Maw decks
Color Identity Spread
2.7% Witch-Maw
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 1.25 · 1.4% (16 of 1,173 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.34 · 57.8% (37 of 64 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 1.30 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.24 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.17 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.08 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.07 · 39.1% (25 of 64 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 1.03 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.98 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.97 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.93 · 40.6% (26 of 64 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.92 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.89 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.89 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.83 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.81 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.81 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.80 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.80 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.79 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.76 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.73 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.72 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.72 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.71 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.69 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.69 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.67 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.67 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.66 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.66 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
All creatures (28)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.34 · 57.8% (37 of 64 decks)
- Plaxcaster Frogling relevance 1.30 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.17 · 50.0% (32 of 64 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.08 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.07 · 39.1% (25 of 64 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.98 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.97 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.92 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.89 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.83 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.81 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.81 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.80 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.80 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.79 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.76 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.72 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.71 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.69 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.67 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.67 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.66 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.65 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.65 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
- Etched Oracle relevance 0.64 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.61 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Felisa, Fang of Silverquill relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.64 · 21.9% (14 of 64 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.93 · 40.6% (26 of 64 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.89 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.69 · 14.1% (9 of 64 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.66 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.60 · 20.3% (13 of 64 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.57 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
All instants (3)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.24 · 46.9% (30 of 64 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 1.03 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.65 · 17.2% (11 of 64 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.73 · 23.4% (15 of 64 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.72 · 18.8% (12 of 64 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.63 · 48.4% (31 of 64 decks)
All lands (9)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.69 · 32.8% (21 of 64 decks)
- Mage-Ring Network relevance 0.62 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Seaside Citadel relevance 0.62 · 37.5% (24 of 64 decks)
- Woodland Cemetery relevance 0.60 · 26.6% (17 of 64 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.60 · 25.0% (16 of 64 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.60 · 12.5% (8 of 64 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.58 · 31.3% (20 of 64 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.58 · 28.1% (18 of 64 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.56 · 15.6% (10 of 64 decks)
EDH data for Give // Take: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 64 real decks.