Give // Take
Played in 190 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
8.3% Sultai
330+26+1+6+3+3+4+7+
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces
1.03| 2.5%
$18.72 · €11.68$30.26 · €31.30
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 1.34 · 14.3% (3 of 21 decks)
- Vorosh, the Hunter relevance 1.31 · 2.3% (7 of 301 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 1.03 · 2.5% (4 of 162 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.08 · 25.3% (48 of 190 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.87 · 36.3% (69 of 190 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.73 · 31.1% (59 of 190 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.72 · 19.5% (37 of 190 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (42 of 190 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.71 · 17.4% (33 of 190 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.69 · 24.7% (47 of 190 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.66 · 20.5% (39 of 190 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.65 · 21.6% (41 of 190 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.57 · 19.5% (37 of 190 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.57 · 25.8% (49 of 190 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.57 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.54 · 23.7% (45 of 190 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (30 of 190 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.52 · 11.6% (22 of 190 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 0.49 · 14.7% (28 of 190 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (21 of 190 decks)
- Soul Diviner relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (29 of 190 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (20 of 190 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.46 · 15.3% (29 of 190 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.46 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 0.45 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.45 · 13.7% (26 of 190 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 0.45 · 13.2% (25 of 190 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 0.45 · 12.6% (24 of 190 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.44 · 16.8% (32 of 190 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.87 · 36.3% (69 of 190 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.72 · 19.5% (37 of 190 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.72 · 22.1% (42 of 190 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.71 · 17.4% (33 of 190 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.69 · 24.7% (47 of 190 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.66 · 20.5% (39 of 190 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.65 · 21.6% (41 of 190 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.63 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.57 · 19.5% (37 of 190 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.53 · 15.8% (30 of 190 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.52 · 11.6% (22 of 190 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 0.49 · 14.7% (28 of 190 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.48 · 8.4% (16 of 190 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.48 · 11.1% (21 of 190 decks)
- Soul Diviner relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (15 of 190 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (20 of 190 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 0.46 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Vastwood Hydra relevance 0.45 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 0.45 · 13.2% (25 of 190 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 0.45 · 12.6% (24 of 190 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.44 · 16.8% (32 of 190 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (19 of 190 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 0.44 · 14.2% (27 of 190 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.42 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 0.42 · 12.1% (23 of 190 decks)
- Cleopatra, Exiled Pharaoh relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (12 of 190 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.46 · 15.3% (29 of 190 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.08 · 25.3% (48 of 190 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.57 · 25.8% (49 of 190 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.54 · 23.7% (45 of 190 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.45 · 13.7% (26 of 190 decks)
- Death's Presence relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (14 of 190 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.42 · 13.2% (25 of 190 decks)
All instants (3)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.73 · 31.1% (59 of 190 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.57 · 9.5% (18 of 190 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.42 · 13.7% (26 of 190 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.48 · 15.3% (29 of 190 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.43 · 20.0% (38 of 190 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.42 · 8.9% (17 of 190 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.45 · 17.9% (34 of 190 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.45 · 15.8% (30 of 190 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.43 · 21.6% (41 of 190 decks)
- Foreboding Landscape relevance 0.42 · 25.8% (49 of 190 decks)
All lands (7)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.56 · 19.5% (37 of 190 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.54 · 21.1% (40 of 190 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.53 · 36.8% (70 of 190 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.53 · 18.4% (35 of 190 decks)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.52 · 17.4% (33 of 190 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.43 · 12.6% (24 of 190 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.42 · 27.4% (52 of 190 decks)
EDH data for Give // Take: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 190 real decks.
















































