Give // Take
Played in 195 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
8.3% Bant
330+22+9+5+3+1+2+8+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.50 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.45 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- The Seventh Doctor // Ace, Fearless Rebel relevance 0.38 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.67 · 38.5% (75 of 195 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.64 · 26.2% (51 of 195 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.60 · 42.6% (83 of 195 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.56 · 26.2% (51 of 195 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.56 · 28.7% (56 of 195 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.55 · 15.9% (31 of 195 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (30 of 195 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (45 of 195 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.54 · 36.4% (71 of 195 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.54 · 10.3% (20 of 195 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (17 of 195 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.50 · 24.1% (47 of 195 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.50 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.49 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.46 · 19.5% (38 of 195 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.44 · 19.0% (37 of 195 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.44 · 11.3% (22 of 195 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.44 · 20.5% (40 of 195 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (24 of 195 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.43 · 25.1% (49 of 195 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (23 of 195 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (17 of 195 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.43 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- Enduring Scalelord relevance 0.43 · 7.2% (14 of 195 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.43 · 22.6% (44 of 195 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (21 of 195 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (19 of 195 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (13 of 195 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.56 · 28.7% (56 of 195 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.55 · 15.9% (31 of 195 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.54 · 36.4% (71 of 195 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.54 · 10.3% (20 of 195 decks)
- Zameck Guildmage relevance 0.53 · 8.7% (17 of 195 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.50 · 24.1% (47 of 195 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.49 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.46 · 19.5% (38 of 195 decks)
- Evolution Sage relevance 0.45 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.44 · 19.0% (37 of 195 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.44 · 11.3% (22 of 195 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.43 · 25.1% (49 of 195 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (23 of 195 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.43 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- Enduring Scalelord relevance 0.43 · 7.2% (14 of 195 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.43 · 22.6% (44 of 195 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (21 of 195 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 0.41 · 9.7% (19 of 195 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.40 · 11.3% (22 of 195 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.39 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.39 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.39 · 16.4% (32 of 195 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.64 · 26.2% (51 of 195 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.60 · 42.6% (83 of 195 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.56 · 26.2% (51 of 195 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.54 · 23.1% (45 of 195 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.50 · 17.9% (35 of 195 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.44 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (17 of 195 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.39 · 15.9% (31 of 195 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.38 · 16.9% (33 of 195 decks)
All instants (5)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.67 · 38.5% (75 of 195 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (30 of 195 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.44 · 20.5% (40 of 195 decks)
- Solidarity of Heroes relevance 0.40 · 6.7% (13 of 195 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (13 of 195 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (24 of 195 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.40 · 21.0% (41 of 195 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.38 · 24.1% (47 of 195 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.38 · 7.7% (15 of 195 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.41 · 19.0% (37 of 195 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.39 · 24.1% (47 of 195 decks)
All lands (8)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.54 · 38.5% (75 of 195 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.49 · 15.9% (31 of 195 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.45 · 23.6% (46 of 195 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.44 · 14.4% (28 of 195 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.43 · 24.1% (47 of 195 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.43 · 27.7% (54 of 195 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.42 · 31.8% (62 of 195 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.41 · 12.8% (25 of 195 decks)
EDH data for Give // Take: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 195 real decks.





















































