Color Identity Spread
29.5% Green
All commanders (30)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 3.93 · 62.0% (2,620 of 4,228 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 3.17 · 55.0% (751 of 1,365 decks)
- Shang-Chi, Master of Kung Fu relevance 3.15 · 71.9% (397 of 552 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 3.12 · 56.3% (634 of 1,126 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 2.90 · 36.0% (1,248 of 3,463 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 2.61 · 39.2% (497 of 1,269 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 2.49 · 38.7% (384 of 991 decks)
- Oviya Pashiri, Sage Lifecrafter relevance 2.18 · 39.3% (177 of 450 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 1.76 · 25.3% (154 of 608 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.71 · 15.8% (489 of 3,104 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 1.62 · 17.6% (247 of 1,403 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 1.35 · 37.9% (25 of 66 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 1.29 · 17.9% (78 of 435 decks)
- Thrasta, Tempest's Roar relevance 1.21 · 19.3% (51 of 264 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 1.14 · 19.7% (39 of 198 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 1.03 · 13.2% (58 of 438 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.96 · 13.5% (42 of 310 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.91 · 15.0% (28 of 187 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.90 · 18.9% (18 of 95 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.76 · 9.8% (35 of 357 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.66 · 10.2% (20 of 196 decks)
- Varis, Silverymoon Ranger relevance 0.63 · 8.4% (25 of 296 decks)
- Radagast of Rhosgobel relevance 0.61 · 3.9% (203 of 5,153 decks)
- Aeve, Progenitor Ooze relevance 0.56 · 4.2% (111 of 2,668 decks)
- Kaysa relevance 0.51 · 10.6% (9 of 85 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.51 · 50.0% (2 of 4 decks)
- Molimo, Maro-Sorcerer relevance 0.51 · 9.7% (10 of 103 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.47 · 12.5% (6 of 48 decks)
- Arashi, the Sky Asunder relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (4 of 24 decks)
- Professor Hojo relevance 0.42 · 5.7% (16 of 281 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.93 · 77.1% (7,193 of 9,325 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.82 · 79.9% (7,449 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.64 · 64.7% (6,037 of 9,325 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.35 · 47.6% (4,438 of 9,325 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.35 · 43.3% (4,036 of 9,325 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 1.33 · 47.1% (4,396 of 9,325 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 1.32 · 40.5% (3,780 of 9,325 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 1.28 · 40.6% (3,787 of 9,325 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.22 · 77.3% (7,210 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.18 · 37.2% (3,471 of 9,325 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.17 · 56.1% (5,230 of 9,325 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.14 · 40.9% (3,810 of 9,325 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.14 · 48.1% (4,484 of 9,325 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 1.13 · 36.3% (3,383 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.12 · 33.3% (3,103 of 9,325 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.11 · 32.6% (3,043 of 9,325 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 1.09 · 50.9% (4,747 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.09 · 31.5% (2,936 of 9,325 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.07 · 33.7% (3,147 of 9,325 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.07 · 32.0% (2,986 of 9,325 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 1.05 · 40.9% (3,814 of 9,325 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.05 · 58.4% (5,443 of 9,325 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 1.03 · 25.4% (2,368 of 9,325 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.00 · 82.7% (7,712 of 9,325 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.00 · 27.6% (2,574 of 9,325 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.99 · 28.8% (2,683 of 9,325 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.98 · 25.4% (2,368 of 9,325 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.97 · 33.2% (3,094 of 9,325 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.97 · 26.6% (2,484 of 9,325 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.93 · 35.2% (3,287 of 9,325 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.93 · 77.1% (7,193 of 9,325 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.82 · 79.9% (7,449 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.64 · 64.7% (6,037 of 9,325 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.35 · 43.3% (4,036 of 9,325 decks)
- Temur Sabertooth relevance 1.33 · 47.1% (4,396 of 9,325 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 1.32 · 40.5% (3,780 of 9,325 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.22 · 77.3% (7,210 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.18 · 37.2% (3,471 of 9,325 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.17 · 56.1% (5,230 of 9,325 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 1.14 · 40.9% (3,810 of 9,325 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.14 · 48.1% (4,484 of 9,325 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 1.13 · 36.3% (3,383 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.12 · 33.3% (3,103 of 9,325 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.11 · 32.6% (3,043 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.09 · 31.5% (2,936 of 9,325 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.07 · 33.7% (3,147 of 9,325 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.07 · 32.0% (2,986 of 9,325 decks)
- Regal Force relevance 1.05 · 40.9% (3,814 of 9,325 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.05 · 58.4% (5,443 of 9,325 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 1.03 · 25.4% (2,368 of 9,325 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.00 · 82.7% (7,712 of 9,325 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.00 · 27.6% (2,574 of 9,325 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 0.99 · 28.8% (2,683 of 9,325 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 0.98 · 25.4% (2,368 of 9,325 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.97 · 26.6% (2,484 of 9,325 decks)
- Fierce Empath relevance 0.93 · 35.2% (3,287 of 9,325 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 0.92 · 25.4% (2,369 of 9,325 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.92 · 36.8% (3,435 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.87 · 31.2% (2,910 of 9,325 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 0.87 · 23.9% (2,229 of 9,325 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.86 · 29.7% (2,774 of 9,325 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.86 · 27.2% (2,541 of 9,325 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.84 · 24.8% (2,311 of 9,325 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.84 · 65.8% (6,138 of 9,325 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.82 · 21.6% (2,012 of 9,325 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.80 · 21.2% (1,980 of 9,325 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.80 · 21.4% (1,999 of 9,325 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.79 · 32.0% (2,983 of 9,325 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.79 · 21.7% (2,022 of 9,325 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.35 · 47.6% (4,438 of 9,325 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 1.28 · 40.6% (3,787 of 9,325 decks)
All instants (5)
- Chord of Calling relevance 1.09 · 50.9% (4,747 of 9,325 decks)
- Summoner's Pact relevance 0.97 · 33.2% (3,094 of 9,325 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 0.93 · 28.0% (2,611 of 9,325 decks)
- Shared Summons relevance 0.83 · 25.0% (2,330 of 9,325 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.82 · 30.0% (2,793 of 9,325 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.91 · 50.2% (4,679 of 9,325 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.82 · 46.9% (4,374 of 9,325 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.81 · 28.1% (2,622 of 9,325 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.75 · 61.3% (5,712 of 9,325 decks)
EDH data for Wirewood Symbiote: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 9,325 real decks.