Color Identity Spread
30.4% Golgari
All commanders (30)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 3.54 · 24.8% (5,048 of 20,323 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 2.85 · 16.7% (3,488 of 20,897 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 2.06 · 17.3% (322 of 1,856 decks)
- Harald, King of Skemfar relevance 1.38 · 23.4% (29 of 124 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 1.20 · 10.4% (75 of 723 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.15 · 47.1% (8 of 17 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 1.08 · 16.8% (21 of 125 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 1.03 · 17.5% (17 of 97 decks)
- Abomination of Llanowar relevance 0.97 · 6.8% (83 of 1,222 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.97 · 33.3% (7 of 21 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.89 · 26.9% (7 of 26 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.83 · 14.3% (12 of 84 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.79 · 29.4% (5 of 17 decks)
- Trystan, Callous Cultivator // Trystan, Penitent Culler relevance 0.63 · 4.6% (37 of 800 decks)
- Miara, Thorn of the Glade // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.59 · 50.0% (2 of 4 decks)
- Shadowheart, Dark Justiciar // Master Chef relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (39 of 1,436 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 0.43 · 2.8% (34 of 1,210 decks)
- Grist, the Hunger Tide relevance 0.35 · 1.7% (69 of 4,055 decks)
- Lluwen, Imperfect Naturalist relevance 0.32 · 1.8% (39 of 2,114 decks)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.32 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Haunted One relevance 0.32 · 11.1% (2 of 18 decks)
- Izoni, Thousand-Eyed relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (9 of 302 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Haunted One relevance 0.29 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.29 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Viconia, Drow Apostate // Master Chef relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.24 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- Gyox, Brutal Carnivora relevance 0.21 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.20 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Davvol, Evincar of Rath relevance 0.14 · 1.6% (5 of 312 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.87 · 93.0% (8,954 of 9,625 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.87 · 91.5% (8,806 of 9,625 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.80 · 81.1% (7,802 of 9,625 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.76 · 74.2% (7,140 of 9,625 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.69 · 63.1% (6,075 of 9,625 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.68 · 69.9% (6,728 of 9,625 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.57 · 41.3% (3,976 of 9,625 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.55 · 70.3% (6,765 of 9,625 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.54 · 43.8% (4,215 of 9,625 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.54 · 75.1% (7,227 of 9,625 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.40 · 52.4% (5,040 of 9,625 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.40 · 55.4% (5,337 of 9,625 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.38 · 42.1% (4,048 of 9,625 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.37 · 55.7% (5,364 of 9,625 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.32 · 45.0% (4,331 of 9,625 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 1.30 · 48.9% (4,711 of 9,625 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.27 · 67.3% (6,476 of 9,625 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.24 · 47.8% (4,605 of 9,625 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.23 · 40.3% (3,880 of 9,625 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.18 · 44.5% (4,282 of 9,625 decks)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 1.16 · 44.0% (4,233 of 9,625 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.16 · 38.1% (3,667 of 9,625 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.15 · 66.9% (6,442 of 9,625 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.13 · 42.0% (4,044 of 9,625 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 1.12 · 38.4% (3,693 of 9,625 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.11 · 39.6% (3,816 of 9,625 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.11 · 38.4% (3,700 of 9,625 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.08 · 42.4% (4,081 of 9,625 decks)
- Skemfar Shadowsage relevance 1.07 · 36.7% (3,534 of 9,625 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 1.06 · 39.5% (3,802 of 9,625 decks)
All creatures (39)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.87 · 93.0% (8,954 of 9,625 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.87 · 91.5% (8,806 of 9,625 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.80 · 81.1% (7,802 of 9,625 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.76 · 74.2% (7,140 of 9,625 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.69 · 63.1% (6,075 of 9,625 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.68 · 69.9% (6,728 of 9,625 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.57 · 41.3% (3,976 of 9,625 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.55 · 70.3% (6,765 of 9,625 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.54 · 43.8% (4,215 of 9,625 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.54 · 75.1% (7,227 of 9,625 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.40 · 52.4% (5,040 of 9,625 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.40 · 55.4% (5,337 of 9,625 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.37 · 55.7% (5,364 of 9,625 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.32 · 45.0% (4,331 of 9,625 decks)
- Shaman of the Pack relevance 1.30 · 48.9% (4,711 of 9,625 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.27 · 67.3% (6,476 of 9,625 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 1.23 · 40.3% (3,880 of 9,625 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.16 · 38.1% (3,667 of 9,625 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.15 · 66.9% (6,442 of 9,625 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 1.13 · 42.0% (4,044 of 9,625 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 1.11 · 39.6% (3,816 of 9,625 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.11 · 38.4% (3,700 of 9,625 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.08 · 42.4% (4,081 of 9,625 decks)
- Skemfar Shadowsage relevance 1.07 · 36.7% (3,534 of 9,625 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 1.06 · 39.5% (3,802 of 9,625 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 1.05 · 53.0% (5,103 of 9,625 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.04 · 30.7% (2,953 of 9,625 decks)
- Seedborn Muse relevance 1.00 · 36.0% (3,468 of 9,625 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.99 · 29.1% (2,804 of 9,625 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.98 · 34.3% (3,298 of 9,625 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.96 · 56.8% (5,470 of 9,625 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 0.91 · 28.1% (2,702 of 9,625 decks)
- Skemfar Avenger relevance 0.91 · 26.0% (2,500 of 9,625 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 0.90 · 27.3% (2,630 of 9,625 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.90 · 30.9% (2,970 of 9,625 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.89 · 34.0% (3,270 of 9,625 decks)
- Copperhorn Scout relevance 0.86 · 23.0% (2,209 of 9,625 decks)
- Wolverine Riders relevance 0.84 · 29.6% (2,852 of 9,625 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.83 · 26.9% (2,587 of 9,625 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Domination relevance 1.38 · 42.1% (4,048 of 9,625 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.96 · 23.7% (2,279 of 9,625 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.94 · 33.9% (3,265 of 9,625 decks)
- Flourishing Defenses relevance 0.91 · 32.6% (3,139 of 9,625 decks)
All instants (1)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.24 · 47.8% (4,605 of 9,625 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.18 · 44.5% (4,282 of 9,625 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Tyvar Kell relevance 1.16 · 44.0% (4,233 of 9,625 decks)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 1.12 · 38.4% (3,693 of 9,625 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.63 · 56.5% (5,436 of 9,625 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.86 · 31.5% (3,035 of 9,625 decks)
All lands (1)
- Gilt-Leaf Palace relevance 1.38 · 48.3% (4,652 of 9,625 decks)
EDH data for Wirewood Symbiote: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 9,625 real decks.