Hieroglyphic Illumination
Played in 106 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Simic
330+8+3+19+9+5+6+
That's every commander.
All commanders (3)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.98 · 5.4% (2 of 37 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.57 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.47 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.03 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.99 · 20.8% (22 of 106 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.79 · 21.7% (23 of 106 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.77 · 14.2% (15 of 106 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (12 of 106 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.67 · 18.9% (20 of 106 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 0.66 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
- Nimble Obstructionist relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (18 of 106 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (18 of 106 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.59 · 17.9% (19 of 106 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 14.2% (15 of 106 decks)
- Naga Vitalist relevance 0.55 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.55 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.54 · 20.8% (22 of 106 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.52 · 33.0% (35 of 106 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.51 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (8 of 106 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.51 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.51 · 17.9% (19 of 106 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.49 · 19.8% (21 of 106 decks)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.46 · 14.2% (15 of 106 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.46 · 26.4% (28 of 106 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.46 · 7.5% (8 of 106 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (12 of 106 decks)
- Nimble Obstructionist relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Springbloom Druid relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (18 of 106 decks)
- Naga Vitalist relevance 0.55 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Beanstalk Giant // Fertile Footsteps relevance 0.55 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
- Sphinx of Magosi relevance 0.51 · 7.5% (8 of 106 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.51 · 17.9% (19 of 106 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.40 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Gift of Paradise relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.47 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.46 · 7.5% (8 of 106 decks)
All instants (19)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.99 · 20.8% (22 of 106 decks)
- Spring // Mind relevance 0.77 · 14.2% (15 of 106 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 0.66 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
- Neutralize relevance 0.64 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.59 · 17.0% (18 of 106 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.56 · 14.2% (15 of 106 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.52 · 33.0% (35 of 106 decks)
- Essence Scatter relevance 0.51 · 13.2% (14 of 106 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.51 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.46 · 14.2% (15 of 106 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (11 of 106 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.45 · 12.3% (13 of 106 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.45 · 20.8% (22 of 106 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.43 · 19.8% (21 of 106 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.41 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.40 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.40 · 15.1% (16 of 106 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.03 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.79 · 21.7% (23 of 106 decks)
- Search for Tomorrow relevance 0.67 · 18.9% (20 of 106 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.59 · 17.9% (19 of 106 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.54 · 20.8% (22 of 106 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.49 · 19.8% (21 of 106 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.46 · 26.4% (28 of 106 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.45 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.45 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.71 · 20.8% (22 of 106 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.64 · 18.9% (20 of 106 decks)
- Slippery Karst relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (10 of 106 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (9 of 106 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 0.43 · 14.2% (15 of 106 decks)
All lands (6)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.74 · 22.6% (24 of 106 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.74 · 28.3% (30 of 106 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.64 · 39.6% (42 of 106 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.48 · 16.0% (17 of 106 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.43 · 21.7% (23 of 106 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (13 of 106 decks)
EDH data for Hieroglyphic Illumination: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 106 real decks.
























































