3030+40+3+4+1+1+1+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Maralen, Fae Ascendant 40.7% of decks
Maralen, Fae Ascendant 40.7% of decks
Thranduil, the Elvenking 45.1% of decks
Thranduil, the Elvenking 45.1% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools 31.0% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools 31.0% of decks
Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero 29.6% of decks
Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero 29.6% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade 40.2% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade 40.2% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel 44.1% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel 44.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Priest of Titania 50.8% of decks
Priest of Titania 50.8% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 48.1% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 48.1% of decks
Lathril, Blade of the Elves 45.1% of decks
Lathril, Blade of the Elves 45.1% of decks
Bloom Tender 57.8% of decks
Bloom Tender 57.8% of decks
Elvish Mystic 55.8% of decks
Elvish Mystic 55.8% of decks
Imperious Perfect 40.3% of decks
Imperious Perfect 40.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 2.85 · 40.7% (11,154 of 27,437 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.79 · 45.1% (5,845 of 12,947 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 1.53 · 31.0% (314 of 1,014 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 1.22 · 29.6% (110 of 371 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 1.07 · 40.2% (33 of 82 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel relevance 0.88 · 44.1% (15 of 34 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.71 · 9.3% (326 of 3,523 decks)
- The Master, Transcendent relevance 0.71 · 9.9% (228 of 2,295 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.68 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 0.56 · 5.0% (1,411 of 27,952 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.52 · 15.0% (19 of 127 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.49 · 6.4% (199 of 3,101 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Armix, Filigree Thrasher relevance 0.45 · 21.9% (7 of 32 decks)
- Yarok, the Desecrated relevance 0.45 · 5.0% (367 of 7,359 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (622 of 14,124 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.42 · 11.2% (18 of 161 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.41 · 12.4% (14 of 113 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.38 · 3.8% (519 of 13,529 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.35 · 4.8% (110 of 2,276 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.35 · 14.3% (7 of 49 decks)
- Kotis, Sibsig Champion relevance 0.34 · 6.3% (41 of 650 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.33 · 4.1% (167 of 4,077 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.33 · 25.0% (3 of 12 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.30 · 21.4% (3 of 14 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (128 of 3,897 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.24 · 4.1% (43 of 1,058 decks)
- The Mimeoplasm relevance 0.23 · 2.9% (110 of 3,760 decks)
- Indominus Rex, Alpha relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (133 of 5,145 decks)
- Mimeoplasm, Revered One relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (39 of 1,311 decks)
- Ghost of Ramirez DePietro // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.15 · 50.8% (11,758 of 23,125 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.10 · 48.1% (11,123 of 23,125 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.05 · 45.1% (10,429 of 23,125 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 1.03 · 57.8% (13,376 of 23,125 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.99 · 55.8% (12,901 of 23,125 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.99 · 40.3% (9,313 of 23,125 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.98 · 67.4% (15,593 of 23,125 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.93 · 35.0% (8,089 of 23,125 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.91 · 39.1% (9,045 of 23,125 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.91 · 34.1% (7,880 of 23,125 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.91 · 33.1% (7,656 of 23,125 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.88 · 37.3% (8,630 of 23,125 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.87 · 31.0% (7,159 of 23,125 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.86 · 32.3% (7,471 of 23,125 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.86 · 31.2% (7,216 of 23,125 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.85 · 36.6% (8,455 of 23,125 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.83 · 37.9% (8,756 of 23,125 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.79 · 31.7% (7,337 of 23,125 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.77 · 23.4% (5,419 of 23,125 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.75 · 27.0% (6,244 of 23,125 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.74 · 26.9% (6,226 of 23,125 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.74 · 27.1% (6,265 of 23,125 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.72 · 22.2% (5,125 of 23,125 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.71 · 22.9% (5,297 of 23,125 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.71 · 22.2% (5,126 of 23,125 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.70 · 38.5% (8,901 of 23,125 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.68 · 23.8% (5,515 of 23,125 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.68 · 20.9% (4,835 of 23,125 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.68 · 23.6% (5,453 of 23,125 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.67 · 23.9% (5,538 of 23,125 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.15 · 50.8% (11,758 of 23,125 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.10 · 48.1% (11,123 of 23,125 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 1.05 · 45.1% (10,429 of 23,125 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 1.03 · 57.8% (13,376 of 23,125 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.99 · 55.8% (12,901 of 23,125 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.99 · 40.3% (9,313 of 23,125 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.98 · 67.4% (15,593 of 23,125 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.93 · 35.0% (8,089 of 23,125 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.91 · 39.1% (9,045 of 23,125 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.91 · 34.1% (7,880 of 23,125 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.91 · 33.1% (7,656 of 23,125 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.88 · 37.3% (8,630 of 23,125 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.87 · 31.0% (7,159 of 23,125 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.86 · 32.3% (7,471 of 23,125 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.86 · 31.2% (7,216 of 23,125 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.85 · 36.6% (8,455 of 23,125 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.83 · 37.9% (8,756 of 23,125 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.79 · 31.7% (7,337 of 23,125 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.77 · 23.4% (5,419 of 23,125 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.75 · 27.0% (6,244 of 23,125 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.74 · 26.9% (6,226 of 23,125 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.72 · 22.2% (5,125 of 23,125 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.71 · 22.2% (5,126 of 23,125 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.70 · 38.5% (8,901 of 23,125 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.68 · 23.8% (5,515 of 23,125 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.68 · 20.9% (4,835 of 23,125 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.68 · 23.6% (5,453 of 23,125 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.67 · 20.2% (4,661 of 23,125 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.66 · 19.4% (4,484 of 23,125 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 0.65 · 19.7% (4,553 of 23,125 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.64 · 21.8% (5,042 of 23,125 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.63 · 21.5% (4,979 of 23,125 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.63 · 22.2% (5,138 of 23,125 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.62 · 21.4% (4,957 of 23,125 decks)
- Morcant's Loyalist relevance 0.62 · 20.2% (4,679 of 23,125 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.62 · 27.9% (6,461 of 23,125 decks)
- Voracious Tome-Skimmer relevance 0.61 · 20.4% (4,716 of 23,125 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.59 · 19.6% (4,524 of 23,125 decks)
- Elrond, Moon-Reader relevance 0.59 · 17.4% (4,013 of 23,125 decks)
- Urborg Elf relevance 0.57 · 18.9% (4,372 of 23,125 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.74 · 27.1% (6,265 of 23,125 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.60 · 22.3% (5,167 of 23,125 decks)
- Kindred Discovery relevance 0.58 · 21.0% (4,865 of 23,125 decks)
All instants (4)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.71 · 22.9% (5,297 of 23,125 decks)
- Harmonized Crescendo relevance 0.67 · 23.9% (5,538 of 23,125 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.63 · 36.0% (8,331 of 23,125 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.59 · 40.4% (9,340 of 23,125 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.64 · 25.7% (5,934 of 23,125 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tyvar, Jubilant Brawler relevance 0.63 · 22.2% (5,127 of 23,125 decks)
All lands (1)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.67 · 22.3% (5,149 of 23,125 decks)
EDH data for Formidable Speaker: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 23,125 real decks.



















































