Pore Over the Pages
Played in 102 Sultai decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (2)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.70 · 1.3% (2 of 155 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.41 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Frantic Search relevance 1.05 · 42.2% (43 of 102 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.65 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.61 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.57 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.57 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.56 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.55 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.55 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Ambition's Cost relevance 0.54 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.52 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.51 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.46 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.46 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.45 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.44 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.43 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.43 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.42 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Sultai Charm relevance 0.42 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 0.39 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
All creatures (5)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 0.61 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- District Guide relevance 0.45 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 0.42 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Gatebreaker Ram relevance 0.39 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Navigation Orb relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.46 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Guild Summit relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
All instants (11)
- Frantic Search relevance 1.05 · 42.2% (43 of 102 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.57 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Eureka Moment relevance 0.57 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.56 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.56 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.55 · 28.4% (29 of 102 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.43 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.43 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Sultai Charm relevance 0.42 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.39 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
All sorceries (12)
- Explore relevance 0.65 · 22.5% (23 of 102 decks)
- Doppelgang relevance 0.55 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Ambition's Cost relevance 0.54 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Circuitous Route relevance 0.54 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.52 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Mulch relevance 0.51 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Urban Evolution relevance 0.46 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 0.46 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Villainous Wealth relevance 0.44 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Malevolent Rumble relevance 0.42 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Broken Bond relevance 0.40 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.38 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.49 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Festering Thicket relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
All lands (17)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 0.71 · 23.5% (24 of 102 decks)
- Dimir Guildgate relevance 0.66 · 18.6% (19 of 102 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.59 · 20.6% (21 of 102 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.58 · 26.5% (27 of 102 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.55 · 26.5% (27 of 102 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.53 · 30.4% (31 of 102 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.53 · 15.7% (16 of 102 decks)
- Lotus Field relevance 0.52 · 15.7% (16 of 102 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.47 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Sea Gate relevance 0.47 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Foul Orchard relevance 0.47 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Manor Gate relevance 0.47 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Black Dragon Gate relevance 0.47 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.45 · 31.4% (32 of 102 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.42 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.41 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
EDH data for Pore Over the Pages: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 102 real decks.