Fyndhorn Elder
Played in 240 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
10
Commanders
10Showing 1-10 of 10
Page size
All commanders (10)
- Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 2.18 · 1.1% (105 of 9,339 decks)
- Johan relevance 1.54 · 5.0% (7 of 139 decks)
- Palladia-Mors relevance 1.48 · 5.6% (6 of 107 decks)
- Rith, the Awakener relevance 1.38 · 1.7% (12 of 718 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.28 · 3.2% (6 of 187 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.96 · 10.5% (2 of 19 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.88 · 7.1% (2 of 28 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.53 · 1.2% (2 of 164 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.33 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
- Jacques le Vert relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.56 · 45.4% (109 of 240 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.54 · 80.0% (192 of 240 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.45 · 51.2% (123 of 240 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.42 · 42.9% (103 of 240 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.30 · 55.4% (133 of 240 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 1.19 · 35.4% (85 of 240 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.17 · 20.0% (48 of 240 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.14 · 30.8% (74 of 240 decks)
- Skyshroud Elf relevance 1.06 · 20.8% (50 of 240 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.05 · 18.8% (45 of 240 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.96 · 23.8% (57 of 240 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.95 · 19.2% (46 of 240 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.95 · 26.7% (64 of 240 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.93 · 23.8% (57 of 240 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.89 · 15.0% (36 of 240 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.86 · 14.2% (34 of 240 decks)
- Leaf Gilder relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Knotvine Mystic relevance 0.83 · 17.5% (42 of 240 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.81 · 22.1% (53 of 240 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.81 · 23.8% (57 of 240 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.77 · 14.2% (34 of 240 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.71 · 20.4% (49 of 240 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.70 · 18.8% (45 of 240 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.70 · 17.5% (42 of 240 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.69 · 22.9% (55 of 240 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.69 · 17.1% (41 of 240 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.68 · 12.5% (30 of 240 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.67 · 11.7% (28 of 240 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.66 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.56 · 45.4% (109 of 240 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.54 · 80.0% (192 of 240 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.45 · 51.2% (123 of 240 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.42 · 42.9% (103 of 240 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.30 · 55.4% (133 of 240 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 1.19 · 35.4% (85 of 240 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 1.17 · 20.0% (48 of 240 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.14 · 30.8% (74 of 240 decks)
- Skyshroud Elf relevance 1.06 · 20.8% (50 of 240 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.05 · 18.8% (45 of 240 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.96 · 23.8% (57 of 240 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.95 · 19.2% (46 of 240 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.95 · 26.7% (64 of 240 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.93 · 23.8% (57 of 240 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.89 · 15.0% (36 of 240 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.86 · 14.2% (34 of 240 decks)
- Leaf Gilder relevance 0.84 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Knotvine Mystic relevance 0.83 · 17.5% (42 of 240 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.81 · 22.1% (53 of 240 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.81 · 23.8% (57 of 240 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.77 · 14.2% (34 of 240 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.71 · 20.4% (49 of 240 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.71 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.70 · 18.8% (45 of 240 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.70 · 17.5% (42 of 240 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.69 · 22.9% (55 of 240 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.69 · 17.1% (41 of 240 decks)
- Beastcaller Savant relevance 0.68 · 12.5% (30 of 240 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.67 · 11.7% (28 of 240 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.66 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.66 · 25.8% (62 of 240 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.65 · 22.5% (54 of 240 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.64 · 13.8% (33 of 240 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.63 · 27.5% (66 of 240 decks)
- Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 0.62 · 13.8% (33 of 240 decks)
- Llanowar Loamspeaker relevance 0.60 · 12.1% (29 of 240 decks)
- Torgal, A Fine Hound relevance 0.60 · 14.2% (34 of 240 decks)
- Ferocious Pup relevance 0.59 · 11.7% (28 of 240 decks)
- Tolsimir, Friend to Wolves relevance 0.59 · 14.6% (35 of 240 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.59 · 20.8% (50 of 240 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.58 · 11.7% (28 of 240 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.58 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.57 · 12.9% (31 of 240 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.57 · 8.3% (20 of 240 decks)
- Nightpack Ambusher relevance 0.55 · 11.3% (27 of 240 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.54 · 13.3% (32 of 240 decks)
- Elvish Pioneer relevance 0.54 · 7.9% (19 of 240 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.52 · 21.7% (52 of 240 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.52 · 16.3% (39 of 240 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (30 of 240 decks)
EDH data for Fyndhorn Elder: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 240 real decks.