Fyndhorn Elder
Played in 144 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
5
Commanders
5Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
All commanders (5)
- Arcades Sabboth relevance 1.98 · 7.4% (9 of 121 decks)
- Rubinia Soulsinger relevance 1.29 · 1.5% (9 of 614 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.47 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.38 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Prava of the Steel Legion relevance 0.37 · 1.2% (1 of 81 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.54 · 26.4% (38 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.29 · 36.1% (52 of 144 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.23 · 66.0% (95 of 144 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.20 · 33.3% (48 of 144 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.15 · 41.0% (59 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.11 · 50.7% (73 of 144 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.00 · 25.7% (37 of 144 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.98 · 23.6% (34 of 144 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.95 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.85 · 22.9% (33 of 144 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.82 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.81 · 19.4% (28 of 144 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.76 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.75 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.75 · 30.6% (44 of 144 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.70 · 18.1% (26 of 144 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.69 · 22.9% (33 of 144 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.69 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.67 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.67 · 21.5% (31 of 144 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.66 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.65 · 18.8% (27 of 144 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.60 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.59 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.59 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
Creatures
42
Creatures
42 Showing 1-10 of 42
Page size
All creatures (42)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 1.54 · 26.4% (38 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.29 · 36.1% (52 of 144 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.23 · 66.0% (95 of 144 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.20 · 33.3% (48 of 144 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.15 · 41.0% (59 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.11 · 50.7% (73 of 144 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.00 · 25.7% (37 of 144 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.98 · 23.6% (34 of 144 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 0.95 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Druid of the Cowl relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.85 · 22.9% (33 of 144 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.82 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.81 · 19.4% (28 of 144 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.76 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.75 · 14.6% (21 of 144 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.75 · 30.6% (44 of 144 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.70 · 18.1% (26 of 144 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.69 · 22.9% (33 of 144 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.69 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.67 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.67 · 21.5% (31 of 144 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.66 · 22.2% (32 of 144 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.65 · 18.8% (27 of 144 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.65 · 16.7% (24 of 144 decks)
- Gyre Engineer relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.60 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.59 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.59 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.58 · 12.5% (18 of 144 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.53 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.50 · 15.3% (22 of 144 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.50 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
- Argothian Elder relevance 0.48 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.46 · 24.3% (35 of 144 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.46 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 0.45 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Piper relevance 0.45 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Elvish Regrower relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.44 · 13.2% (19 of 144 decks)
- Citanul Hierophants relevance 0.44 · 6.9% (10 of 144 decks)
Enchantments
3
Enchantments
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All enchantments (3)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.57 · 18.1% (26 of 144 decks)
- Sylvan Library relevance 0.46 · 16.0% (23 of 144 decks)
- Arboreal Alliance relevance 0.45 · 9.7% (14 of 144 decks)
Instants
3
Instants
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All instants (3)
- Elven Ambush relevance 0.56 · 11.1% (16 of 144 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.49 · 10.4% (15 of 144 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.46 · 11.8% (17 of 144 decks)
Lands
1
Lands
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All lands (1)
- Elfhame Palace relevance 0.45 · 7.6% (11 of 144 decks)
EDH data for Fyndhorn Elder: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 144 real decks.