Copperhorn Scout
Played in 1,001 Naya decks
930+46+1+1+2+
Color Identity Spread
6.2% Naya
Commanders
Voja, Jaws of the Conclave 7.6% of decks
Voja, Jaws of the Conclave 7.6% of decks
Ghired, Mirror of the Wilds 1.8% of decks
Ghired, Mirror of the Wilds 1.8% of decks
Samut, Voice of Dissent 2.0% of decks
Samut, Voice of Dissent 2.0% of decks
Marisi, Breaker of the Coil 1.1% of decks
Marisi, Breaker of the Coil 1.1% of decks
Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 33.3% of decks
Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 33.3% of decks
Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant 2.2% of decks
Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant 2.2% of decks
Most Relevant
Priest of Titania 66.4% of decks
Priest of Titania 66.4% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 60.4% of decks
Elvish Archdruid 60.4% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 51.7% of decks
Marwyn, the Nurturer 51.7% of decks
Elvish Mystic 71.8% of decks
Elvish Mystic 71.8% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 42.0% of decks
Elvish Warmaster 42.0% of decks
Shalai and Hallar 54.4% of decks
Shalai and Hallar 54.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (9)
- Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 3.73 · 7.6% (742 of 9,813 decks)
- Ghired, Mirror of the Wilds relevance 1.26 · 1.8% (52 of 2,953 decks)
- Samut, Voice of Dissent relevance 1.05 · 2.0% (21 of 1,045 decks)
- Marisi, Breaker of the Coil relevance 0.92 · 1.1% (43 of 4,092 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.58 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.39 · 2.2% (2 of 91 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.35 · 1.8% (2 of 112 decks)
- Johan relevance 0.30 · 1.3% (2 of 152 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Othelm, Sigardian Outcast relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.21 · 66.4% (665 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.08 · 60.4% (605 of 1,001 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.84 · 51.7% (518 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.67 · 71.8% (719 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.58 · 42.0% (420 of 1,001 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 1.57 · 54.4% (545 of 1,001 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.53 · 54.5% (546 of 1,001 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 1.48 · 40.1% (401 of 1,001 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 1.47 · 43.7% (437 of 1,001 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.44 · 75.2% (753 of 1,001 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.41 · 36.1% (361 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.39 · 29.7% (297 of 1,001 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.37 · 33.9% (339 of 1,001 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 1.37 · 32.7% (327 of 1,001 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 1.28 · 45.2% (452 of 1,001 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.27 · 37.2% (372 of 1,001 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 1.20 · 47.8% (478 of 1,001 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 1.17 · 38.9% (389 of 1,001 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.16 · 31.4% (314 of 1,001 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.15 · 28.3% (283 of 1,001 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 1.10 · 46.7% (467 of 1,001 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.06 · 42.0% (420 of 1,001 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 1.06 · 38.7% (387 of 1,001 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.05 · 22.2% (222 of 1,001 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.04 · 23.7% (237 of 1,001 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.03 · 22.0% (220 of 1,001 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 1.00 · 26.3% (263 of 1,001 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 1.00 · 30.4% (304 of 1,001 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.99 · 20.3% (203 of 1,001 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.98 · 30.8% (308 of 1,001 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Priest of Titania relevance 2.21 · 66.4% (665 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.08 · 60.4% (605 of 1,001 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.84 · 51.7% (518 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.67 · 71.8% (719 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.58 · 42.0% (420 of 1,001 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 1.57 · 54.4% (545 of 1,001 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.53 · 54.5% (546 of 1,001 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 1.48 · 40.1% (401 of 1,001 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 1.47 · 43.7% (437 of 1,001 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.44 · 75.2% (753 of 1,001 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.41 · 36.1% (361 of 1,001 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.39 · 29.7% (297 of 1,001 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 1.37 · 33.9% (339 of 1,001 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 1.37 · 32.7% (327 of 1,001 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 1.28 · 45.2% (452 of 1,001 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.27 · 37.2% (372 of 1,001 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 1.20 · 47.8% (478 of 1,001 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 1.17 · 38.9% (389 of 1,001 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.16 · 31.4% (314 of 1,001 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.15 · 28.3% (283 of 1,001 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.06 · 42.0% (420 of 1,001 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 1.06 · 38.7% (387 of 1,001 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.05 · 22.2% (222 of 1,001 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.04 · 23.7% (237 of 1,001 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.03 · 22.0% (220 of 1,001 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 1.00 · 26.3% (263 of 1,001 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 1.00 · 30.4% (304 of 1,001 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.99 · 20.3% (203 of 1,001 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.98 · 30.8% (308 of 1,001 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.98 · 35.9% (359 of 1,001 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.90 · 22.5% (225 of 1,001 decks)
- Wolf-Skull Shaman relevance 0.90 · 20.2% (202 of 1,001 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.89 · 18.0% (180 of 1,001 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.88 · 27.9% (279 of 1,001 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.87 · 21.7% (217 of 1,001 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.85 · 24.7% (247 of 1,001 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 0.84 · 20.8% (208 of 1,001 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.84 · 15.4% (154 of 1,001 decks)
- Chomping Changeling relevance 0.83 · 23.0% (230 of 1,001 decks)
- Tolsimir, Midnight's Light relevance 0.80 · 19.7% (197 of 1,001 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.80 · 29.6% (296 of 1,001 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.77 · 18.8% (188 of 1,001 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.77 · 32.2% (322 of 1,001 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 0.77 · 13.4% (134 of 1,001 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.75 · 13.7% (137 of 1,001 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.74 · 14.7% (147 of 1,001 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 1.10 · 46.7% (467 of 1,001 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.76 · 24.0% (240 of 1,001 decks)
All instants (2)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.94 · 40.1% (401 of 1,001 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.93 · 20.2% (202 of 1,001 decks)
EDH data for Copperhorn Scout: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,001 real decks.






















