Copperhorn Scout
Played in 4,344 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
27.4% Green
All commanders (30)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 3.88 · 49.2% (673 of 1,369 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 3.61 · 29.8% (1,262 of 4,236 decks)
- Tromell, Seymour's Butler relevance 3.27 · 51.4% (225 of 438 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 2.70 · 24.3% (309 of 1,274 decks)
- Eladamri, Lord of Leaves relevance 2.15 · 23.3% (102 of 437 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 2.10 · 12.2% (378 of 3,110 decks)
- Yisan, the Wanderer Bard relevance 2.09 · 16.2% (183 of 1,127 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 2.03 · 14.4% (203 of 1,407 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 1.81 · 32.6% (31 of 95 decks)
- Imaryll, Elfhame Elite relevance 1.52 · 18.1% (36 of 199 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.37 · 16.0% (30 of 187 decks)
- Oviya Pashiri, Sage Lifecrafter relevance 1.33 · 11.1% (50 of 452 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 1.05 · 8.7% (31 of 358 decks)
- Anthousa, Setessan Hero relevance 1.01 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.84 · 23.8% (5 of 21 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.79 · 42.9% (3 of 7 decks)
- Kamahl, Fist of Krosa relevance 0.75 · 6.1% (19 of 311 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.63 · 3.4% (34 of 996 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.62 · 6.4% (10 of 157 decks)
- Glissa Sunseeker relevance 0.60 · 9.1% (6 of 66 decks)
- Thriss, Nantuko Primus relevance 0.55 · 11.1% (4 of 36 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.54 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.49 · 12.0% (3 of 25 decks)
- Sachi, Daughter of Seshiro relevance 0.48 · 4.5% (9 of 202 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.48 · 20.0% (2 of 10 decks)
- Toski, Bearer of Secrets relevance 0.46 · 2.4% (26 of 1,086 decks)
- Seton, Krosan Protector relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (17 of 609 decks)
- Benjamin Sisko, Besieged relevance 0.45 · 16.7% (2 of 12 decks)
- Oviya, Automech Artisan relevance 0.44 · 1.9% (41 of 2,187 decks)
- Numa, Joraga Chieftain relevance 0.43 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.81 · 71.3% (3,099 of 4,344 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.67 · 73.6% (3,198 of 4,344 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.67 · 52.5% (2,280 of 4,344 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.63 · 52.3% (2,271 of 4,344 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.62 · 46.8% (2,031 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.52 · 44.9% (1,952 of 4,344 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.42 · 46.5% (2,019 of 4,344 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.42 · 42.4% (1,843 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.41 · 44.8% (1,944 of 4,344 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.35 · 35.6% (1,545 of 4,344 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.33 · 35.4% (1,539 of 4,344 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.32 · 36.2% (1,573 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.32 · 38.2% (1,660 of 4,344 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.31 · 36.0% (1,562 of 4,344 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.28 · 35.3% (1,532 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.25 · 31.7% (1,377 of 4,344 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.25 · 50.0% (2,174 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.24 · 34.2% (1,484 of 4,344 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.20 · 35.2% (1,529 of 4,344 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.18 · 31.0% (1,345 of 4,344 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.17 · 37.2% (1,617 of 4,344 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.17 · 30.1% (1,308 of 4,344 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.16 · 31.8% (1,381 of 4,344 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.13 · 31.3% (1,360 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.12 · 28.6% (1,242 of 4,344 decks)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.08 · 27.4% (1,189 of 4,344 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.05 · 66.6% (2,895 of 4,344 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.05 · 58.1% (2,526 of 4,344 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 1.00 · 30.2% (1,313 of 4,344 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.00 · 48.2% (2,095 of 4,344 decks)
All creatures (42)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.81 · 71.3% (3,099 of 4,344 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.67 · 73.6% (3,198 of 4,344 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 1.67 · 52.5% (2,280 of 4,344 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 1.63 · 52.3% (2,271 of 4,344 decks)
- Lys Alana Huntmaster relevance 1.62 · 46.8% (2,031 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 1.52 · 44.9% (1,952 of 4,344 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.42 · 46.5% (2,019 of 4,344 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 1.42 · 42.4% (1,843 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 1.41 · 44.8% (1,944 of 4,344 decks)
- Timberwatch Elf relevance 1.35 · 35.6% (1,545 of 4,344 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 1.33 · 35.4% (1,539 of 4,344 decks)
- Wirewood Channeler relevance 1.32 · 36.2% (1,573 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 1.32 · 38.2% (1,660 of 4,344 decks)
- Immaculate Magistrate relevance 1.31 · 36.0% (1,562 of 4,344 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 1.28 · 35.3% (1,532 of 4,344 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 1.25 · 50.0% (2,174 of 4,344 decks)
- Elvish Champion relevance 1.24 · 34.2% (1,484 of 4,344 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 1.20 · 35.2% (1,529 of 4,344 decks)
- Wellwisher relevance 1.18 · 31.0% (1,345 of 4,344 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.17 · 37.2% (1,617 of 4,344 decks)
- Heritage Druid relevance 1.17 · 30.1% (1,308 of 4,344 decks)
- Canopy Tactician relevance 1.16 · 31.8% (1,381 of 4,344 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.13 · 31.3% (1,360 of 4,344 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.05 · 66.6% (2,895 of 4,344 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 1.05 · 58.1% (2,526 of 4,344 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 1.00 · 48.2% (2,095 of 4,344 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.95 · 22.8% (989 of 4,344 decks)
- Fauna Shaman relevance 0.95 · 30.5% (1,323 of 4,344 decks)
- Joraga Treespeaker relevance 0.94 · 27.8% (1,206 of 4,344 decks)
- Champions of the Perfect relevance 0.94 · 24.4% (1,058 of 4,344 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.89 · 22.1% (960 of 4,344 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.85 · 29.4% (1,276 of 4,344 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.85 · 30.3% (1,315 of 4,344 decks)
- Llanowar Tribe relevance 0.84 · 37.5% (1,627 of 4,344 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.84 · 65.9% (2,861 of 4,344 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.83 · 68.7% (2,983 of 4,344 decks)
- Essence Warden relevance 0.82 · 23.5% (1,023 of 4,344 decks)
- Llanowar Visionary relevance 0.81 · 24.0% (1,041 of 4,344 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.78 · 30.6% (1,330 of 4,344 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.77 · 32.3% (1,405 of 4,344 decks)
- Yeva, Nature's Herald relevance 0.76 · 30.7% (1,333 of 4,344 decks)
- Jagged-Scar Archers relevance 0.72 · 15.5% (672 of 4,344 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.84 · 29.4% (1,278 of 4,344 decks)
- Umbral Mantle relevance 0.79 · 25.0% (1,088 of 4,344 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Elvish Guidance relevance 1.25 · 31.7% (1,377 of 4,344 decks)
All instants (2)
- Elven Ambush relevance 1.08 · 27.4% (1,189 of 4,344 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 1.00 · 30.2% (1,313 of 4,344 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Elvish Promenade relevance 1.12 · 28.6% (1,242 of 4,344 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.75 · 21.1% (915 of 4,344 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.33 · 46.4% (2,015 of 4,344 decks)
EDH data for Copperhorn Scout: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,344 real decks.