Fauna Shaman
Played in 3,128 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Voja, Jaws of the Conclave relevance 3.00 · 11.2% (1,082 of 9,680 decks)
- Samut, Voice of Dissent relevance 2.41 · 14.8% (152 of 1,027 decks)
- Duskana, the Rage Mother relevance 2.36 · 9.4% (357 of 3,804 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 1.30 · 3.5% (177 of 5,026 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 1.16 · 3.0% (164 of 5,521 decks)
- Phabine, Boss's Confidant relevance 0.89 · 4.1% (25 of 609 decks)
- Ghired, Mirror of the Wilds relevance 0.81 · 2.3% (66 of 2,893 decks)
- Minsc, Beloved Ranger relevance 0.74 · 3.4% (20 of 597 decks)
- Mayael the Anima relevance 0.68 · 2.0% (42 of 2,058 decks)
- Wayta, Trainer Prodigy relevance 0.63 · 1.5% (65 of 4,204 decks)
- Annie Flash, the Veteran relevance 0.58 · 2.8% (13 of 468 decks)
- Zacama, Primal Calamity relevance 0.58 · 1.6% (41 of 2,552 decks)
- Marath, Will of the Wild relevance 0.56 · 1.7% (34 of 2,034 decks)
- Havi, the All-Father relevance 0.56 · 2.1% (19 of 887 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.53 · 3.6% (7 of 192 decks)
- Tifa, Martial Artist relevance 0.48 · 1.1% (58 of 5,279 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.47 · 3.4% (6 of 178 decks)
- Jetmir, Nexus of Revels relevance 0.45 · 1.1% (51 of 4,760 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.45 · 4.4% (4 of 91 decks)
- Ghired, Conclave Exile relevance 0.41 · 1.3% (23 of 1,836 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Akiri, Line-Slinger relevance 0.40 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Rith, the Awakener relevance 0.39 · 1.6% (12 of 749 decks)
- Gahiji, Honored One relevance 0.30 · 1.3% (8 of 605 decks)
- Ultra Magnus, Tactician // Ultra Magnus, Armored Carrier relevance 0.24 · 1.0% (8 of 781 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.22 · 2.4% (2 of 82 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (2 of 89 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (2 of 96 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant relevance 0.19 · 1.9% (2 of 108 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Othelm, Sigardian Outcast relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.19 · 35.7% (1,118 of 3,128 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.15 · 49.4% (1,545 of 3,128 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.14 · 40.6% (1,271 of 3,128 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.07 · 55.7% (1,741 of 3,128 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.06 · 29.8% (933 of 3,128 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.05 · 30.6% (957 of 3,128 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.03 · 40.4% (1,265 of 3,128 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.90 · 33.2% (1,037 of 3,128 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.90 · 31.1% (972 of 3,128 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.85 · 20.9% (655 of 3,128 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.85 · 35.5% (1,111 of 3,128 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.83 · 22.4% (700 of 3,128 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (605 of 3,128 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 0.79 · 20.7% (648 of 3,128 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.78 · 19.5% (610 of 3,128 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.77 · 27.2% (852 of 3,128 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.76 · 16.0% (502 of 3,128 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.76 · 25.1% (786 of 3,128 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.73 · 19.5% (610 of 3,128 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 0.72 · 17.3% (540 of 3,128 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.71 · 17.6% (549 of 3,128 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 0.71 · 21.0% (658 of 3,128 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.69 · 29.5% (922 of 3,128 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.68 · 25.1% (784 of 3,128 decks)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.68 · 21.5% (674 of 3,128 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.67 · 28.6% (896 of 3,128 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.65 · 19.1% (597 of 3,128 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.65 · 26.0% (812 of 3,128 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.65 · 17.6% (551 of 3,128 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.64 · 20.1% (628 of 3,128 decks)
All creatures (40)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.19 · 35.7% (1,118 of 3,128 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.15 · 49.4% (1,545 of 3,128 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.14 · 40.6% (1,271 of 3,128 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.07 · 55.7% (1,741 of 3,128 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 1.06 · 29.8% (933 of 3,128 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.05 · 30.6% (957 of 3,128 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 1.03 · 40.4% (1,265 of 3,128 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.90 · 33.2% (1,037 of 3,128 decks)
- Shalai and Hallar relevance 0.90 · 31.1% (972 of 3,128 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.85 · 20.9% (655 of 3,128 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.85 · 35.5% (1,111 of 3,128 decks)
- Devoted Druid relevance 0.83 · 22.4% (700 of 3,128 decks)
- Allosaurus Shepherd relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (605 of 3,128 decks)
- Rocco, Cabaretti Caterer relevance 0.79 · 20.7% (648 of 3,128 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.78 · 19.5% (610 of 3,128 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.77 · 27.2% (852 of 3,128 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.76 · 16.0% (502 of 3,128 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.76 · 25.1% (786 of 3,128 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.73 · 19.5% (610 of 3,128 decks)
- Bramblewood Paragon relevance 0.72 · 17.3% (540 of 3,128 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.71 · 17.6% (549 of 3,128 decks)
- Druid of the Anima relevance 0.71 · 21.0% (658 of 3,128 decks)
- Realmwalker relevance 0.68 · 25.1% (784 of 3,128 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.65 · 19.1% (597 of 3,128 decks)
- Mirror Entity relevance 0.65 · 26.0% (812 of 3,128 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.65 · 17.6% (551 of 3,128 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.64 · 20.1% (628 of 3,128 decks)
- Masked Vandal relevance 0.63 · 19.2% (602 of 3,128 decks)
- Joraga Warcaller relevance 0.61 · 12.4% (388 of 3,128 decks)
- Dionus, Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.58 · 13.3% (416 of 3,128 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.58 · 15.7% (492 of 3,128 decks)
- Boreal Druid relevance 0.58 · 11.7% (367 of 3,128 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.58 · 41.2% (1,290 of 3,128 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.57 · 18.0% (563 of 3,128 decks)
- Cemetery Prowler relevance 0.57 · 14.0% (438 of 3,128 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.56 · 18.9% (591 of 3,128 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.56 · 12.7% (398 of 3,128 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (368 of 3,128 decks)
- Grand Abolisher relevance 0.55 · 19.1% (596 of 3,128 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.54 · 15.6% (488 of 3,128 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.67 · 28.6% (896 of 3,128 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.56 · 12.7% (397 of 3,128 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- All Will Be One relevance 0.68 · 21.5% (674 of 3,128 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.56 · 42.5% (1,328 of 3,128 decks)
All instants (3)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.69 · 29.5% (922 of 3,128 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.62 · 20.5% (641 of 3,128 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.58 · 24.6% (771 of 3,128 decks)
All lands (3)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.68 · 39.9% (1,249 of 3,128 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.57 · 40.8% (1,276 of 3,128 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.56 · 45.1% (1,412 of 3,128 decks)
EDH data for Fauna Shaman: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 3,128 real decks.