Fauna Shaman
Played in 2,503 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
2930+34+2+3+5+2+1+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (29)
- Ellie and Alan, Paleontologists relevance 3.17 · 22.5% (332 of 1,476 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 1.95 · 6.5% (328 of 5,027 decks)
- Galadriel, Light of Valinor relevance 1.94 · 5.3% (562 of 10,529 decks)
- Helga, Skittish Seer relevance 1.07 · 2.3% (284 of 12,435 decks)
- Derevi, Empyrial Tactician relevance 1.00 · 2.4% (155 of 6,339 decks)
- Roon of the Hidden Realm relevance 0.74 · 2.3% (46 of 1,979 decks)
- Shaun & Rebecca, Agents relevance 0.73 · 4.7% (12 of 257 decks)
- Mr. Foxglove relevance 0.70 · 1.9% (62 of 3,239 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.67 · 10.8% (4 of 37 decks)
- Jenara, Asura of War relevance 0.67 · 3.4% (15 of 444 decks)
- Lagrella, the Magpie relevance 0.53 · 1.9% (21 of 1,084 decks)
- Tocasia, Dig Site Mentor relevance 0.46 · 1.9% (14 of 729 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.42 · 2.3% (8 of 346 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Livio, Oathsworn Sentinel relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (4 of 109 decks)
- Rubinia Soulsinger relevance 0.39 · 1.7% (11 of 634 decks)
- Falco Spara, Pactweaver relevance 0.39 · 1.2% (24 of 2,014 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen, Mercenary relevance 0.35 · 1.7% (8 of 466 decks)
- Storvald, Frost Giant Jarl relevance 0.34 · 1.5% (10 of 674 decks)
- Amareth, the Lustrous relevance 0.33 · 1.3% (11 of 831 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Jo Grant relevance 0.32 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.26 · 3.2% (2 of 62 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Prava of the Steel Legion relevance 0.21 · 2.4% (2 of 85 decks)
- Ragnar relevance 0.21 · 2.2% (2 of 90 decks)
- Sidar Kondo of Jamuraa // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.15 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Othelm, Sigardian Outcast // Hargilde, Kindly Runechanter relevance 0.14 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- The Eighth Doctor // Susan Foreman relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (1 of 40 decks)
- Susan Foreman // The Second Doctor relevance 0.14 · 1.2% (2 of 161 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.09 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.09 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.94 · 50.2% (1,257 of 2,503 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.89 · 41.0% (1,025 of 2,503 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.85 · 34.7% (868 of 2,503 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.78 · 30.6% (767 of 2,503 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.78 · 27.7% (694 of 2,503 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.77 · 34.8% (870 of 2,503 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.74 · 20.5% (513 of 2,503 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.70 · 22.8% (571 of 2,503 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.68 · 35.6% (890 of 2,503 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.67 · 31.8% (795 of 2,503 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.65 · 33.3% (834 of 2,503 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.64 · 21.7% (542 of 2,503 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.63 · 21.0% (525 of 2,503 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.62 · 26.8% (671 of 2,503 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (362 of 2,503 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.59 · 14.1% (352 of 2,503 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.58 · 13.7% (343 of 2,503 decks)
- Noble Hierarch relevance 0.57 · 41.7% (1,044 of 2,503 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (365 of 2,503 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.57 · 11.5% (288 of 2,503 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.57 · 15.9% (399 of 2,503 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (332 of 2,503 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.55 · 14.1% (352 of 2,503 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.55 · 19.3% (482 of 2,503 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (440 of 2,503 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (385 of 2,503 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.53 · 20.6% (515 of 2,503 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.52 · 11.8% (295 of 2,503 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.50 · 13.5% (337 of 2,503 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.50 · 12.6% (316 of 2,503 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.94 · 50.2% (1,257 of 2,503 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.89 · 41.0% (1,025 of 2,503 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.85 · 34.7% (868 of 2,503 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.78 · 30.6% (767 of 2,503 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.78 · 27.7% (694 of 2,503 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.74 · 20.5% (513 of 2,503 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.70 · 22.8% (571 of 2,503 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.68 · 35.6% (890 of 2,503 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.67 · 31.8% (795 of 2,503 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.65 · 33.3% (834 of 2,503 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.63 · 21.0% (525 of 2,503 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.60 · 14.5% (362 of 2,503 decks)
- Elvish Harbinger relevance 0.59 · 14.1% (352 of 2,503 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.58 · 13.7% (343 of 2,503 decks)
- Noble Hierarch relevance 0.57 · 41.7% (1,044 of 2,503 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (365 of 2,503 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.57 · 11.5% (288 of 2,503 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.57 · 15.9% (399 of 2,503 decks)
- Eladamri, Korvecdal relevance 0.55 · 13.3% (332 of 2,503 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.55 · 14.1% (352 of 2,503 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (440 of 2,503 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.54 · 15.4% (385 of 2,503 decks)
- Colossal Skyturtle relevance 0.52 · 11.8% (295 of 2,503 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.50 · 13.5% (337 of 2,503 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 0.50 · 12.6% (316 of 2,503 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.50 · 11.1% (278 of 2,503 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.48 · 11.6% (290 of 2,503 decks)
- Wood Elves relevance 0.47 · 15.7% (392 of 2,503 decks)
- Mirrorshell Crab relevance 0.47 · 8.9% (222 of 2,503 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 0.47 · 10.1% (252 of 2,503 decks)
- Marauding Brinefang relevance 0.47 · 8.9% (224 of 2,503 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.47 · 23.0% (575 of 2,503 decks)
- Nurturing Bristleback relevance 0.46 · 8.7% (219 of 2,503 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.45 · 16.3% (408 of 2,503 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.50 · 27.3% (683 of 2,503 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.46 · 10.3% (257 of 2,503 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 0.64 · 21.7% (542 of 2,503 decks)
- Monstrous Vortex relevance 0.47 · 10.5% (264 of 2,503 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.46 · 17.8% (446 of 2,503 decks)
All instants (5)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.77 · 34.8% (870 of 2,503 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.62 · 26.8% (671 of 2,503 decks)
- Chord of Calling relevance 0.55 · 19.3% (482 of 2,503 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.49 · 39.7% (994 of 2,503 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.46 · 29.6% (742 of 2,503 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.53 · 20.6% (515 of 2,503 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.49 · 15.5% (388 of 2,503 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.49 · 24.1% (604 of 2,503 decks)
All lands (3)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.51 · 39.3% (984 of 2,503 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.48 · 35.8% (897 of 2,503 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.46 · 35.3% (884 of 2,503 decks)
EDH data for Fauna Shaman: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 2,503 real decks.






































































