Fists of Ironwood
Played in 208 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
3.7% Simic
730+14+2+16+4+10+1+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (7)
- Esix, Fractal Bloom relevance 2.17 · 2.1% (37 of 1,731 decks)
- Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief relevance 1.94 · 1.3% (43 of 3,206 decks)
- Eutropia the Twice-Favored relevance 1.60 · 3.2% (10 of 314 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 1.31 · 1.5% (11 of 750 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.74 · 3.3% (2 of 60 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.73 · 3.1% (2 of 65 decks)
- Feywild Visitor // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.50 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Saproling Migration relevance 1.19 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Hornet Queen relevance 1.07 · 33.2% (69 of 208 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.91 · 21.6% (45 of 208 decks)
- Deep Forest Hermit relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.81 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.71 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Fungal Sprouting relevance 0.71 · 13.0% (27 of 208 decks)
- Verdant Command relevance 0.70 · 10.1% (21 of 208 decks)
- Saproling Symbiosis relevance 0.69 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.68 · 14.9% (31 of 208 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.65 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.65 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Squirrel Nest relevance 0.63 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.61 · 20.2% (42 of 208 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.61 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.60 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.60 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.59 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.59 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.59 · 13.0% (27 of 208 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.58 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Aether Mutation relevance 0.57 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.57 · 16.3% (34 of 208 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.57 · 24.0% (50 of 208 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.55 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (24 of 208 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.55 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Hornet Queen relevance 1.07 · 33.2% (69 of 208 decks)
- Deep Forest Hermit relevance 0.86 · 17.3% (36 of 208 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 0.68 · 14.9% (31 of 208 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.61 · 20.2% (42 of 208 decks)
- Coiling Oracle relevance 0.57 · 24.0% (50 of 208 decks)
- Ambush Viper relevance 0.55 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Leafkin Druid relevance 0.55 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Needlethorn Drake relevance 0.53 · 9.1% (19 of 208 decks)
- Winged Coatl relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (19 of 208 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 0.51 · 7.7% (16 of 208 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 0.49 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- Curiosity Crafter relevance 0.48 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Avenger of Zendikar relevance 0.47 · 23.1% (48 of 208 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.58 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Esika's Chariot relevance 0.55 · 11.5% (24 of 208 decks)
All enchantments (16)
- Rancor relevance 0.91 · 21.6% (45 of 208 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.81 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.71 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.65 · 13.9% (29 of 208 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.65 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Squirrel Nest relevance 0.63 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.61 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.60 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.59 · 16.8% (35 of 208 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.59 · 13.5% (28 of 208 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.59 · 13.0% (27 of 208 decks)
- Awakening Zone relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (26 of 208 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.55 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
- Verdant Embrace relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (17 of 208 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.51 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.50 · 11.5% (24 of 208 decks)
All instants (4)
- Verdant Command relevance 0.70 · 10.1% (21 of 208 decks)
- Turn Aside relevance 0.60 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Return to Nature relevance 0.57 · 16.3% (34 of 208 decks)
- Defend the Hearth relevance 0.48 · 7.2% (15 of 208 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Saproling Migration relevance 1.19 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Fungal Sprouting relevance 0.71 · 13.0% (27 of 208 decks)
- Saproling Symbiosis relevance 0.69 · 11.1% (23 of 208 decks)
- Aether Mutation relevance 0.57 · 9.6% (20 of 208 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.51 · 9.1% (19 of 208 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.50 · 15.4% (32 of 208 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.50 · 17.8% (37 of 208 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.49 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.48 · 12.0% (25 of 208 decks)
- Asinine Antics relevance 0.48 · 8.7% (18 of 208 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Nissa, Voice of Zendikar relevance 0.52 · 10.6% (22 of 208 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.89 · 18.8% (39 of 208 decks)
All lands (2)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.56 · 28.4% (59 of 208 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.52 · 15.9% (33 of 208 decks)
EDH data for Fists of Ironwood: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 208 real decks.


























































