Tiger Claws
Played in 66 Green decks
Color Identity Spread
1130+6+37+4+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (11)
- Hellcat, Undying Vigilante relevance 1.51 · 11.1% (3 of 27 decks)
- Silvos, Rogue Elemental relevance 1.33 · 5.6% (3 of 54 decks)
- Autumn Willow relevance 1.04 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Diamond Weapon relevance 1.03 · 1.0% (4 of 399 decks)
- Edgar, Moonlit Sovereign relevance 0.91 · 1.1% (3 of 278 decks)
- Mirri, Cat Warrior relevance 0.88 · 2.4% (2 of 83 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 0.81 · 1.7% (2 of 118 decks)
- Braulios of Pheres Band relevance 0.77 · 1.4% (2 of 146 decks)
- Go-Shintai of Boundless Vigor relevance 0.70 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen of Efrava relevance 0.50 · 1.5% (1 of 66 decks)
- Master Chef // Wilson, Refined Grizzly relevance 0.47 · 1.3% (1 of 80 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Dragon Fangs relevance 1.71 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Gaea's Embrace relevance 1.64 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 1.44 · 34.8% (23 of 66 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 1.25 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 1.23 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.19 · 47.0% (31 of 66 decks)
- Treetop Bracers relevance 1.19 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 1.12 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 1.08 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 1.03 · 21.2% (14 of 66 decks)
- Primal Frenzy relevance 1.02 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.96 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.94 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Carapace relevance 0.92 · 13.6% (9 of 66 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.91 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.87 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.86 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Rofellos's Gift relevance 0.86 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Ferocity relevance 0.83 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Primitive Etchings relevance 0.82 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.81 · 34.8% (23 of 66 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.79 · 13.6% (9 of 66 decks)
- Uktabi Wildcats relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.77 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (17 of 66 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.76 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.76 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Epic Proportions relevance 0.74 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Creeping Mold relevance 0.72 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.72 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.91 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Uktabi Wildcats relevance 0.78 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.66 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elder relevance 0.58 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Krosan Wayfarer relevance 0.57 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.55 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
All enchantments (37)
- Dragon Fangs relevance 1.71 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Gaea's Embrace relevance 1.64 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 1.44 · 34.8% (23 of 66 decks)
- Frantic Strength relevance 1.25 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 1.23 · 24.2% (16 of 66 decks)
- Rancor relevance 1.19 · 47.0% (31 of 66 decks)
- Treetop Bracers relevance 1.19 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 1.12 · 28.8% (19 of 66 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 1.08 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 1.03 · 21.2% (14 of 66 decks)
- Primal Frenzy relevance 1.02 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.96 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Predatory Hunger relevance 0.94 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Carapace relevance 0.92 · 13.6% (9 of 66 decks)
- Talons of Wildwood relevance 0.87 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.86 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Ferocity relevance 0.83 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Primitive Etchings relevance 0.82 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.81 · 34.8% (23 of 66 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.79 · 13.6% (9 of 66 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.77 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (17 of 66 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.76 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.76 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Epic Proportions relevance 0.74 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.72 · 18.2% (12 of 66 decks)
- Rowen relevance 0.71 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.70 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Regeneration relevance 0.68 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.66 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Mark of Sakiko relevance 0.64 · 13.6% (9 of 66 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.59 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Fists of Ironwood relevance 0.59 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.58 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.58 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.55 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.54 · 37.9% (25 of 66 decks)
All instants (4)
- Fog relevance 0.64 · 36.4% (24 of 66 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (11 of 66 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.60 · 19.7% (13 of 66 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.55 · 22.7% (15 of 66 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Rofellos's Gift relevance 0.86 · 15.2% (10 of 66 decks)
- Creeping Mold relevance 0.72 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.65 · 12.1% (8 of 66 decks)
EDH data for Tiger Claws: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 66 real decks.













































