Careful Consideration
Played in 310 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
9.3% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (12)
- Alandra, Sky Dreamer relevance 2.03 · 3.2% (38 of 1,201 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 1.66 · 2.0% (33 of 1,683 decks)
- Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 1.12 · 40.0% (2 of 5 decks)
- Lier, Disciple of the Drowned relevance 1.12 · 1.8% (11 of 625 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 1.01 · 2.2% (7 of 323 decks)
- Immortus, Master of Eternity relevance 0.71 · 2.5% (3 of 122 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 0.50 · 1.8% (2 of 112 decks)
- Hakim, Loreweaver relevance 0.40 · 1.1% (2 of 190 decks)
- Saruman the White relevance 0.32 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.28 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
- Meloku the Clouded Mirror relevance 0.25 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
- Tomorrow, Azami's Familiar relevance 0.25 · 1.0% (1 of 99 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.96 · 32.6% (101 of 310 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.80 · 19.0% (59 of 310 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 0.72 · 16.1% (50 of 310 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.71 · 32.3% (100 of 310 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.70 · 28.4% (88 of 310 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.65 · 20.3% (63 of 310 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (62 of 310 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.62 · 22.6% (70 of 310 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.61 · 31.6% (98 of 310 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.60 · 20.3% (63 of 310 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.58 · 18.4% (57 of 310 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 0.57 · 11.6% (36 of 310 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.57 · 26.1% (81 of 310 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.54 · 31.9% (99 of 310 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.53 · 13.2% (41 of 310 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.51 · 27.4% (85 of 310 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.51 · 12.9% (40 of 310 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.51 · 33.5% (104 of 310 decks)
- Rain of Revelation relevance 0.50 · 9.0% (28 of 310 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.50 · 17.1% (53 of 310 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.50 · 27.4% (85 of 310 decks)
- Catalog relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (26 of 310 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.48 · 26.1% (81 of 310 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.47 · 27.7% (86 of 310 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.46 · 17.4% (54 of 310 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.46 · 28.4% (88 of 310 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.45 · 18.4% (57 of 310 decks)
- Flux relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (31 of 310 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (26 of 310 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.43 · 13.2% (41 of 310 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.57 · 26.1% (81 of 310 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.47 · 27.7% (86 of 310 decks)
- Mischievous Mystic relevance 0.46 · 17.4% (54 of 310 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.46 · 28.4% (88 of 310 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.43 · 13.2% (41 of 310 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.42 · 23.2% (72 of 310 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.41 · 17.7% (55 of 310 decks)
- Loyal Drake relevance 0.41 · 11.6% (36 of 310 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.41 · 20.0% (62 of 310 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.41 · 17.1% (53 of 310 decks)
- Looter il-Kor relevance 0.40 · 10.0% (31 of 310 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.39 · 15.2% (47 of 310 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.40 · 14.5% (45 of 310 decks)
- Aether Syphon relevance 0.39 · 11.0% (34 of 310 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.51 · 27.4% (85 of 310 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.50 · 27.4% (85 of 310 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.38 · 16.8% (52 of 310 decks)
All instants (22)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.96 · 32.6% (101 of 310 decks)
- Thirst for Identity relevance 0.72 · 16.1% (50 of 310 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.71 · 32.3% (100 of 310 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.70 · 28.4% (88 of 310 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.63 · 20.0% (62 of 310 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.62 · 22.6% (70 of 310 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.61 · 31.6% (98 of 310 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.60 · 20.3% (63 of 310 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 0.57 · 11.6% (36 of 310 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.53 · 13.2% (41 of 310 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.51 · 33.5% (104 of 310 decks)
- Rain of Revelation relevance 0.50 · 9.0% (28 of 310 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.50 · 17.1% (53 of 310 decks)
- Catalog relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (26 of 310 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.48 · 26.1% (81 of 310 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (26 of 310 decks)
- Pull from Tomorrow relevance 0.42 · 17.4% (54 of 310 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.41 · 10.6% (33 of 310 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.40 · 12.9% (40 of 310 decks)
- Read the Runes relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (26 of 310 decks)
- Focus the Mind relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (23 of 310 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.38 · 10.3% (32 of 310 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.80 · 19.0% (59 of 310 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.65 · 20.3% (63 of 310 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.58 · 18.4% (57 of 310 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.54 · 31.9% (99 of 310 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.51 · 12.9% (40 of 310 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.45 · 18.4% (57 of 310 decks)
- Flux relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (31 of 310 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.40 · 25.8% (80 of 310 decks)
- Strategic Planning relevance 0.39 · 8.4% (26 of 310 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.45 · 18.7% (58 of 310 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.44 · 21.0% (65 of 310 decks)
EDH data for Careful Consideration: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 310 real decks.