Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.27 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Scrivener relevance 0.40 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.30 · 26.0% (26 of 100 decks)
- Heartstone relevance 0.32 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Boomerang relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.28 · 27.0% (27 of 100 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.31 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.26 · 32.0% (32 of 100 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.27 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
- Sands of Delirium relevance 0.36 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Keening Stone relevance 0.33 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Divert relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.26 · 30.0% (30 of 100 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.23 · 41.0% (41 of 100 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.29 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.31 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Laquatus's Disdain relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.29 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- The Mindskinner relevance 0.28 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.23 · 32.0% (32 of 100 decks)
- Drowned Secrets relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Loyal Inventor relevance 0.29 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.24 · 30.0% (30 of 100 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.23 · 31.0% (31 of 100 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.29 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.26 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Myr Welder relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 0.26 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.26 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Bruvac the Grandiloquent relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.26 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Chronic Flooding relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Mindshrieker relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Wizened Snitches relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.26 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 0.25 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.24 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Eye of Ramos relevance 0.30 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Grand Architect relevance 0.25 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.21 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
Card Stacks
20
Card Stacks
20Showing 1-2 of 20
Cards like Tribute Mage
6.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards
- Tribute Mage 32%
- Trinket Mage 31%
- Trophy Mage 29%
- Transit Mage 9%
- Treasure Mage 2%
Cards like Sol Ring
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 80% of other blue decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 15% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 1.0 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 75%
- Basalt Monolith 41%
- Mana Vault 19%
- Grim Monolith 18%
Cards like Mystical Tutor
3.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystical Tutor 34%
- Merchant Scroll 32%
- Solve the Equation 22%
- Personal Tutor 15%
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Traumatize
5.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
- Traumatize 18%
- Cut Your Losses 16%
Cards like Fabricate
3.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 23% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.27 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 38%
- Scour for Scrap 20%
Cards like Ruin Crab
2.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Ruin Crab 21%
- Hedron Crab 15%
Cards like Forensic Gadgeteer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other blue decks
Cards
- Forensic Gadgeteer 29%
- Heartstone 17%
Cards like Boomerang
17× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards
- Boomerang 16%
- Capsize 11%
- Eye of Nowhere 1%
- Regress 1%
Other options: Surging Aether, Cut the Earthly Bond, Rescind, Lost in the Mist, Wipe Away
Cards like Archaeomancer
3.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
44% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.65 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Peregrine Drake
3.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other blue decks
Cards
- Peregrine Drake 30%
- Palinchron 12%
- Cloud of Faeries 8%
- Great Whale 2%
Cards like Reshape
3.9× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.26 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other blue decks
Cards
- Reshape 15%
- Transmute Artifact 11%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
2.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other blue decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 22%
- Hedron Archive 10%
- Sisay's Ring 3%
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory 2%
- Ring of the Lucii 1%
- Ur-Golem's Eye 1%
Other options: Ichor Elixir
Cards like Sky Diamond
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Corrupted Grafstone, Obsidian Obelisk
Cards like Drowned Secrets
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
17% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Omen Hawker
6.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Will 20%
- Force of Negation 14%
Cards like Aetherize
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 35% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other blue decks
Cards like Pongify
1.1× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 32%
- Rapid Hybridization 29%
Cards like Swan Song
1.2× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 30% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other blue decks
Cards
- Swan Song 23%
- Strix Serenade 6%
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Scrivener relevance 0.40 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 0.30 · 26.0% (26 of 100 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.28 · 27.0% (27 of 100 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.26 · 32.0% (32 of 100 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.27 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
- Drift of Phantasms relevance 0.29 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Palinchron relevance 0.31 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- The Mindskinner relevance 0.28 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Loyal Inventor relevance 0.29 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.24 · 30.0% (30 of 100 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.23 · 31.0% (31 of 100 decks)
- Myr Welder relevance 0.33 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.20 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Bruvac the Grandiloquent relevance 0.26 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Mindshrieker relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Wizened Snitches relevance 0.32 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Mnemonic Wall relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Grand Architect relevance 0.25 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Aven Fisher relevance 0.31 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.21 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 0.23 · 21.0% (21 of 100 decks)
- Pili-Pala relevance 0.27 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Drowner Initiate relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Body Double relevance 0.27 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Merfolk Mesmerist relevance 0.29 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Hedron Crab relevance 0.22 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Terisian Mindbreaker relevance 0.23 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Transit Mage relevance 0.24 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Silver Myr relevance 0.19 · 23.0% (23 of 100 decks)
- Fleet Swallower relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Sea Scryer relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Dreamborn Muse relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Bilbo, Luckwearer // Burglar's Plot relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer relevance 0.23 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Man-o'-War relevance 0.23 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Shrieking Drake relevance 0.23 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Geology Enthusiast relevance 0.24 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Air Elemental relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Grimoire Thief relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Walking Atlas relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Tidal Warrior relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Silent Arbiter relevance 0.21 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.17 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Venser, Shaper Savant relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Shipwreck Dowser relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Heartstone relevance 0.32 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Sands of Delirium relevance 0.36 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Keening Stone relevance 0.33 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.26 · 30.0% (30 of 100 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.23 · 41.0% (41 of 100 decks)
- The Enigma Jewel // Locus of Enlightenment relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Lantern of Insight relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Relic of Progenitus relevance 0.29 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Moonsilver Key relevance 0.26 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Eye of Ramos relevance 0.30 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Codex Shredder relevance 0.23 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.23 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Grimoire of the Dead relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Voltaic Key relevance 0.22 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Ghoulcaller's Bell relevance 0.27 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Millstone relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.18 · 32.0% (32 of 100 decks)
- Mesmeric Orb relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Hair-Strung Koto relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.19 · 19.0% (19 of 100 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.18 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.21 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.21 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.18 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.18 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.16 · 30.0% (30 of 100 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.19 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Riverchurn Monument relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Eye of Ojer Taq // Apex Observatory relevance 0.27 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Tormod's Crypt relevance 0.18 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.19 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Dreamstone Hedron relevance 0.21 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Laser Screwdriver relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.15 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Mindcrank relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.15 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Stone of Erech relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Grindclock relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Folio of Fancies relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.27 · 40.0% (40 of 100 decks)
- Power Artifact relevance 0.29 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Drowned Secrets relevance 0.28 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Fraying Sanity relevance 0.26 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Chronic Flooding relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.22 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Curse of the Bloody Tome relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.23 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Ensoul Artifact relevance 0.26 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Memory Erosion relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.23 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Pemmin's Aura relevance 0.22 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Treasure Trove relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.20 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.18 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.18 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Freed from the Real relevance 0.19 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Court of Cunning relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Stillness in Motion relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 29.0% (29 of 100 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Pedantic Learning relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Founding the Third Path relevance 0.20 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Merrow Commerce relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Lost in Thought relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Mist of Stagnation relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Frozen Solid relevance 0.23 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Deeproot Pilgrimage relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Arcane Laboratory relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.11 · 27.0% (27 of 100 decks)
- Patient Rebuilding relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Field of Dreams relevance 0.22 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.11 · 25.0% (25 of 100 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.14 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.18 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Deeproot Waters relevance 0.15 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Forced Fruition relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.12 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Mind Over Matter relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.16 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.11 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Control Magic relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Boomerang relevance 0.32 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Dizzy Spell relevance 0.31 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Divert relevance 0.36 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Laquatus's Disdain relevance 0.38 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.26 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Power Sink relevance 0.30 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Trickbind relevance 0.28 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Didn't Say Please relevance 0.25 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Thought Collapse relevance 0.26 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Stern Lesson relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.19 · 36.0% (36 of 100 decks)
- Curfew relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Drown in Dreams relevance 0.23 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.21 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.25 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Forbid relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Last Word relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Spell Crumple relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.22 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.17 · 37.0% (37 of 100 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 0.25 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.23 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Stroke of Genius relevance 0.23 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.20 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Dissipate relevance 0.23 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Archive Trap relevance 0.22 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Dream Twist relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.19 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.20 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.16 · 34.0% (34 of 100 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.21 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.20 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.19 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.17 · 19.0% (19 of 100 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.19 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.20 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Countermand relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Winds of Rebuke relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.16 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.15 · 26.0% (26 of 100 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Envelop relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.16 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.15 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.16 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Ertai's Meddling relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.23 · 32.0% (32 of 100 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.26 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.26 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Stream of Thought relevance 0.31 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Cut Your Losses relevance 0.26 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Personal Tutor relevance 0.24 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 0.24 · 17.0% (17 of 100 decks)
- Legerdemain relevance 0.30 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Fascination relevance 0.28 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 0.22 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- Mind Sculpt relevance 0.26 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.19 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.16 · 38.0% (38 of 100 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.20 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.16 · 37.0% (37 of 100 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.22 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.21 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Tasha's Hideous Laughter relevance 0.22 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.22 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Tome Scour relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.18 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.18 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.22 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.17 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Bond of Insight relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.14 · 30.0% (30 of 100 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 0.21 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.17 · 10.0% (10 of 100 decks)
- Sleight of Hand relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.12 · 32.0% (32 of 100 decks)
- Prosperity relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Portent relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Relearn relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Energy Tap relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Dematerialize relevance 0.24 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Laquatus's Creativity relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Bribery relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Weight of Memory relevance 0.21 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Extract relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Clear the Mind relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Chill of Foreboding relevance 0.19 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.14 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
Planeswalkers
11
Planeswalkers
11 Showing 1-10 of 11
Page size
All planeswalkers (11)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.19 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Jace Beleren relevance 0.21 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Jace, Memory Adept relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.13 · 11.0% (11 of 100 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Karn, Living Legacy relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Jace, Architect of Thought relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Jace, Vryn's Prodigy // Jace, Telepath Unbound relevance 0.13 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
Utility Lands
48
Utility Lands
48 Showing 1-10 of 48
Page size
All utility lands (48)
- Ice Floe relevance 0.38 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Deserted Temple relevance 0.31 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- Tower of the Magistrate relevance 0.35 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.24 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Ghost Town relevance 0.28 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Shelters All relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.17 · 21.0% (21 of 100 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.18 · 16.0% (16 of 100 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.17 · 21.0% (21 of 100 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.17 · 19.0% (19 of 100 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.15 · 28.0% (28 of 100 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.15 · 22.0% (22 of 100 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.19 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.18 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.16 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.17 · 7.0% (7 of 100 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.15 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Ipnu Rivulet relevance 0.18 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.14 · 13.0% (13 of 100 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.12 · 20.0% (20 of 100 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 21.0% (21 of 100 decks)
- Soldevi Excavations relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.15 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.12 · 14.0% (14 of 100 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.13 · 6.0% (6 of 100 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Oboro, Palace in the Clouds relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.13 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Blasted Landscape relevance 0.17 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.07 · 36.0% (36 of 100 decks)
- Magosi, the Waterveil relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.11 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.10 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.12 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.09 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.11 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.06 · 28.0% (28 of 100 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.12 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.08 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.11 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Mikokoro, Center of the Sea relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.08 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.08 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
Lands
25
Lands
25 Showing 1-10 of 25
Page size
All lands (25)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.18 · 18.0% (18 of 100 decks)
- Matzalantli, the Great Door // The Core relevance 0.23 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Scorched Ruins relevance 0.23 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.19 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.16 · 9.0% (9 of 100 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.17 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.15 · 8.0% (8 of 100 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.13 · 12.0% (12 of 100 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.16 · 4.0% (4 of 100 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.12 · 15.0% (15 of 100 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.13 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.12 · 5.0% (5 of 100 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.13 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Thaumatic Compass // Spires of Orazca relevance 0.15 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.14 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.11 · 3.0% (3 of 100 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.10 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Three Tree City relevance 0.09 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.06 · 2.0% (2 of 100 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 77.0% (77 of 100 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ambassador Laquatus, from 100 real Commander decks.