Careful Consideration
Played in 255 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
7.6% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (5)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.36 · 1.8% (116 of 6,370 decks)
- Niambi, Esteemed Speaker relevance 1.79 · 6.3% (11 of 174 decks)
- Bruna, Light of Alabaster relevance 1.52 · 1.5% (26 of 1,739 decks)
- Niambi, Faithful Healer relevance 0.97 · 5.7% (3 of 53 decks)
- Stenn, Paranoid Partisan relevance 0.64 · 1.0% (4 of 391 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Compulsive Research relevance 2.07 · 43.1% (110 of 255 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 1.90 · 31.8% (81 of 255 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 1.87 · 34.1% (87 of 255 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 1.84 · 31.0% (79 of 255 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.78 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 1.78 · 36.5% (93 of 255 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.76 · 25.5% (65 of 255 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 1.74 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Catalog relevance 1.72 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.70 · 27.5% (70 of 255 decks)
- Amass the Components relevance 1.70 · 27.5% (70 of 255 decks)
- Arcane Endeavor relevance 1.65 · 26.3% (67 of 255 decks)
- Commander's Insight relevance 1.63 · 27.1% (69 of 255 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 1.61 · 26.7% (68 of 255 decks)
- Bonded Fetch relevance 1.53 · 24.7% (63 of 255 decks)
- April, Reporter of the Weird relevance 1.49 · 23.5% (60 of 255 decks)
- Arcane Epiphany relevance 1.48 · 24.3% (62 of 255 decks)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 1.46 · 27.8% (71 of 255 decks)
- All-Seeing Arbiter relevance 1.46 · 24.7% (63 of 255 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 1.45 · 38.4% (98 of 255 decks)
- Arcane Investigator relevance 1.45 · 21.6% (55 of 255 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 1.43 · 21.2% (54 of 255 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 1.42 · 32.9% (84 of 255 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 1.42 · 34.9% (89 of 255 decks)
- Dirgur Focusmage // Braingeyser relevance 1.40 · 23.9% (61 of 255 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 1.39 · 21.6% (55 of 255 decks)
- Bewildering Blizzard relevance 1.38 · 20.4% (52 of 255 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 1.38 · 20.4% (52 of 255 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 1.36 · 26.7% (68 of 255 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 1.36 · 27.1% (69 of 255 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 1.76 · 25.5% (65 of 255 decks)
- Bonded Fetch relevance 1.53 · 24.7% (63 of 255 decks)
- April, Reporter of the Weird relevance 1.49 · 23.5% (60 of 255 decks)
- Atemsis, All-Seeing relevance 1.46 · 27.8% (71 of 255 decks)
- All-Seeing Arbiter relevance 1.46 · 24.7% (63 of 255 decks)
- Arcane Investigator relevance 1.45 · 21.6% (55 of 255 decks)
- Arcanis the Omnipotent relevance 1.42 · 32.9% (84 of 255 decks)
- Dirgur Focusmage // Braingeyser relevance 1.40 · 23.9% (61 of 255 decks)
- Body of Knowledge relevance 1.35 · 40.8% (104 of 255 decks)
- Blue Marvel, Adam Brashear relevance 1.34 · 20.4% (52 of 255 decks)
- Ancient Silver Dragon relevance 1.30 · 29.0% (74 of 255 decks)
- Chancellor of the Spires relevance 1.26 · 20.0% (51 of 255 decks)
- Captain of Umbar relevance 1.25 · 18.8% (48 of 255 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 1.31 · 30.2% (77 of 255 decks)
- Battle of Wits relevance 1.30 · 34.5% (88 of 255 decks)
All instants (19)
- Case the Joint relevance 1.74 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Catalog relevance 1.72 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Commander's Insight relevance 1.63 · 27.1% (69 of 255 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 1.61 · 26.7% (68 of 255 decks)
- Arcane Epiphany relevance 1.48 · 24.3% (62 of 255 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 1.45 · 38.4% (98 of 255 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 1.43 · 21.2% (54 of 255 decks)
- Bewildering Blizzard relevance 1.38 · 20.4% (52 of 255 decks)
- Jace's Ingenuity relevance 1.38 · 20.4% (52 of 255 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 1.36 · 27.1% (69 of 255 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.34 · 22.4% (57 of 255 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 1.34 · 22.4% (57 of 255 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 1.34 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 1.32 · 34.9% (89 of 255 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 1.31 · 19.2% (49 of 255 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 1.30 · 27.1% (69 of 255 decks)
- Draconic Lore relevance 1.25 · 18.4% (47 of 255 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 1.25 · 19.6% (50 of 255 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 1.23 · 18.4% (47 of 255 decks)
All sorceries (16)
- Compulsive Research relevance 2.07 · 43.1% (110 of 255 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 1.90 · 31.8% (81 of 255 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 1.87 · 34.1% (87 of 255 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 1.84 · 31.0% (79 of 255 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.78 · 25.9% (66 of 255 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 1.78 · 36.5% (93 of 255 decks)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 1.70 · 27.5% (70 of 255 decks)
- Amass the Components relevance 1.70 · 27.5% (70 of 255 decks)
- Arcane Endeavor relevance 1.65 · 26.3% (67 of 255 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 1.42 · 34.9% (89 of 255 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 1.39 · 21.6% (55 of 255 decks)
- Ancestral Vision relevance 1.36 · 26.7% (68 of 255 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 1.32 · 30.6% (78 of 255 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 1.26 · 22.7% (58 of 255 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 1.26 · 19.2% (49 of 255 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 1.25 · 18.0% (46 of 255 decks)
EDH data for Careful Consideration: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 255 real decks.