Cephalid Sage
Played in 158 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
37.7% Blue
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (9)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 5.41 · 54.0% (88 of 163 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 1.84 · 6.3% (9 of 144 decks)
- Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 0.73 · 1.4% (3 of 214 decks)
- Naru Meha, Master Wizard relevance 0.54 · 1.1% (2 of 176 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.46 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Doc Ock, Sinister Scientist relevance 0.46 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Meneldor, Swift Savior relevance 0.42 · 2.1% (1 of 47 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.41 · 1.9% (1 of 52 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Faceless One relevance 0.39 · 1.7% (1 of 59 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 4.64 · 74.1% (117 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 4.43 · 76.6% (121 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 4.10 · 61.4% (97 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.68 · 59.5% (94 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.21 · 65.2% (103 of 158 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.18 · 60.1% (95 of 158 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 3.14 · 57.0% (90 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 3.05 · 53.8% (85 of 158 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.48 · 41.1% (65 of 158 decks)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.45 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.36 · 48.1% (76 of 158 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.09 · 37.3% (59 of 158 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.89 · 44.3% (70 of 158 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.77 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.75 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.54 · 27.2% (43 of 158 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.50 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.48 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.48 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.46 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.45 · 42.4% (67 of 158 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.42 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.36 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.31 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.24 · 34.8% (55 of 158 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 1.21 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.17 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.16 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.08 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.08 · 19.0% (30 of 158 decks)
All creatures (29)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 4.64 · 74.1% (117 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 4.43 · 76.6% (121 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 4.10 · 61.4% (97 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 3.68 · 59.5% (94 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 3.21 · 65.2% (103 of 158 decks)
- Llawan, Cephalid Empress relevance 3.18 · 60.1% (95 of 158 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 3.14 · 57.0% (90 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 3.05 · 53.8% (85 of 158 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 2.36 · 48.1% (76 of 158 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 2.09 · 37.3% (59 of 158 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.75 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.50 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 1.48 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.46 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Omen Hawker relevance 1.45 · 42.4% (67 of 158 decks)
- Wonder relevance 1.42 · 45.6% (72 of 158 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.36 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.17 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 1.08 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 1.08 · 19.0% (30 of 158 decks)
- Archetype of Imagination relevance 1.06 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 1.02 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Bubble Smuggler relevance 0.84 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.77 · 11.4% (18 of 158 decks)
- Mothdust Changeling relevance 0.75 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Amoeboid Changeling relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Ambassador Laquatus relevance 0.63 · 10.8% (17 of 158 decks)
- Shapesharer relevance 0.56 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Sealock Monster relevance 0.56 · 8.2% (13 of 158 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Hylda's Crown of Winter relevance 1.16 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.94 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.63 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 2.48 · 41.1% (65 of 158 decks)
- Verity Circle relevance 1.89 · 44.3% (70 of 158 decks)
- Betrayal relevance 1.54 · 27.2% (43 of 158 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 1.48 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Levitation relevance 1.31 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
- Reflections of Littjara relevance 0.73 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Opposition relevance 0.66 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
All instants (3)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.92 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Deluge relevance 0.88 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Keep Watch relevance 0.56 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Theft of Dreams relevance 2.45 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 1.77 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.24 · 34.8% (55 of 158 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 1.21 · 38.0% (60 of 158 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.70 · 13.3% (21 of 158 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, the Moon Sage relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 1.03 · 43.0% (68 of 158 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.60 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Sage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 158 real decks.