Cephalid Sage
Played in 82 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
19.4% Dimir
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (3)
- Runo Stromkirk // Krothuss, Lord of the Deep relevance 2.26 · 1.1% (33 of 3,079 decks)
- Taigam, Sidisi's Hand relevance 0.70 · 1.0% (2 of 195 decks)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.59 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.39 · 42.7% (35 of 82 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.50 · 36.6% (30 of 82 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 1.42 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.42 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.34 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 1.24 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 1.24 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 1.20 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.17 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.11 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.10 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.08 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.08 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 1.06 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 1.05 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 1.02 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.99 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.98 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.96 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 0.95 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.95 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Purple Pentapus relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Lochmere Serpent relevance 0.92 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- River Serpent relevance 0.92 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Wrexial, the Risen Deep relevance 0.91 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
- Striped Riverwinder relevance 0.91 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.89 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.88 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 0.87 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.86 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 2.39 · 42.7% (35 of 82 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.50 · 36.6% (30 of 82 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 1.42 · 35.4% (29 of 82 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 1.42 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Octoprophet relevance 1.34 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 1.24 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 1.24 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 1.20 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 1.17 · 23.2% (19 of 82 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.10 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 1.08 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 1.08 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 1.06 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Kiora, the Rising Tide relevance 1.05 · 25.6% (21 of 82 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 1.02 · 26.8% (22 of 82 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.99 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Deranged Assistant relevance 0.98 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.96 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 0.95 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.95 · 28.0% (23 of 82 decks)
- Purple Pentapus relevance 0.94 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Lochmere Serpent relevance 0.92 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- River Serpent relevance 0.92 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Wrexial, the Risen Deep relevance 0.91 · 30.5% (25 of 82 decks)
- Striped Riverwinder relevance 0.91 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.89 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.88 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 0.87 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.86 · 17.1% (14 of 82 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 0.83 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.81 · 19.5% (16 of 82 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.81 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.77 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Grozoth relevance 0.74 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Biblioplex Kraken relevance 0.74 · 11.0% (9 of 82 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 0.74 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 0.71 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.67 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 0.66 · 14.6% (12 of 82 decks)
- Icebreaker Kraken relevance 0.66 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Ultros, Obnoxious Octopus relevance 0.64 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Quest for Ula's Temple relevance 0.75 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
All instants (3)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.70 · 24.4% (20 of 82 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.68 · 18.3% (15 of 82 decks)
- Dihada's Ploy relevance 0.61 · 12.2% (10 of 82 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.11 · 29.3% (24 of 82 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 0.77 · 15.9% (13 of 82 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 0.70 · 20.7% (17 of 82 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 0.69 · 13.4% (11 of 82 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.61 · 9.8% (8 of 82 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Sage: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 82 real decks.