In Too Deep
Played in 102 Jeskai decks
530+11+4+18+3+3+11+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Hargilde, Kindly Runechanter 5.2% of decks
Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Hargilde, Kindly Runechanter 5.2% of decks
Martha Jones // The War Doctor 5.6% of decks
Martha Jones // The War Doctor 5.6% of decks
The Eleventh Doctor // Dan Lewis 5.0% of decks
The Eleventh Doctor // Dan Lewis 5.0% of decks
The Seventh Doctor // Dan Lewis 2.6% of decks
The Seventh Doctor // Dan Lewis 2.6% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Dargo, the Shipwrecker 1.8% of decks
Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Dargo, the Shipwrecker 1.8% of decks
Most Relevant
Imprisoned in the Moon 21.6% of decks
Imprisoned in the Moon 21.6% of decks
Amphibian Downpour 19.6% of decks
Amphibian Downpour 19.6% of decks
Darksteel Mutation 19.6% of decks
Darksteel Mutation 19.6% of decks
Swift Reconfiguration 10.8% of decks
Swift Reconfiguration 10.8% of decks
Tamiyo's Journal 10.8% of decks
Tamiyo's Journal 10.8% of decks
Polymorphist's Jest 9.8% of decks
Polymorphist's Jest 9.8% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Hargilde, Kindly Runechanter relevance 1.43 · 5.2% (4 of 77 decks)
- Martha Jones // The War Doctor relevance 0.63 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- The Eleventh Doctor // Dan Lewis relevance 0.61 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
- The Seventh Doctor // Dan Lewis relevance 0.53 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.48 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.85 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.82 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.67 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.54 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Lavinia, Foil to Conspiracy relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Starfield of Nyx relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.52 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Kitesail Larcenist relevance 0.50 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 0.50 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Coveted Falcon relevance 0.49 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Malcolm, the Eyes relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Shardmage's Rescue relevance 0.48 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.48 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.44 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Assimilation Aegis relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Sticky Fingers relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.42 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Whirlwind of Thought relevance 0.42 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Staggering Insight relevance 0.41 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Sheltered by Ghosts relevance 0.41 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (17 of 102 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.54 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Lavinia, Foil to Conspiracy relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Kitesail Larcenist relevance 0.50 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Mesa Enchantress relevance 0.50 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Coveted Falcon relevance 0.49 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Malcolm, the Eyes relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.42 · 13.7% (14 of 102 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 0.40 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Tishana's Tidebinder relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 0.67 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Assimilation Aegis relevance 0.42 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.37 · 26.5% (27 of 102 decks)
All enchantments (18)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.85 · 21.6% (22 of 102 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.82 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Darksteel Mutation relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (20 of 102 decks)
- Swift Reconfiguration relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Starfield of Nyx relevance 0.52 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 0.52 · 10.8% (11 of 102 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Shardmage's Rescue relevance 0.48 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.48 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.44 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Sticky Fingers relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.42 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Whirlwind of Thought relevance 0.42 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- Staggering Insight relevance 0.41 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
- Sheltered by Ghosts relevance 0.41 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (17 of 102 decks)
- Curse of Opulence relevance 0.38 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.36 · 7.8% (8 of 102 decks)
All instants (3)
- Polymorphist's Jest relevance 0.62 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Deflecting Palm relevance 0.39 · 12.7% (13 of 102 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.37 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Library relevance 0.61 · 8.8% (9 of 102 decks)
- Legion Leadership // Legion Stronghold relevance 0.44 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.43 · 11.8% (12 of 102 decks)
All lands (11)
- Training Center relevance 0.52 · 37.3% (38 of 102 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.50 · 17.6% (18 of 102 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.47 · 34.3% (35 of 102 decks)
- Nimbus Maze relevance 0.44 · 9.8% (10 of 102 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.44 · 26.5% (27 of 102 decks)
- Spectator Seating relevance 0.43 · 32.4% (33 of 102 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.41 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.38 · 15.7% (16 of 102 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (15 of 102 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.36 · 27.5% (28 of 102 decks)
EDH data for In Too Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 102 real decks.
















































