In Too Deep
Played in 107 Sultai decks
130+11+33+2+4+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
Imprisoned in the Moon 29.9% of decks
Imprisoned in the Moon 29.9% of decks
Eidolon of Blossoms 22.4% of decks
Eidolon of Blossoms 22.4% of decks
Kenrith's Transformation 24.3% of decks
Kenrith's Transformation 24.3% of decks
Witness Protection 23.4% of decks
Witness Protection 23.4% of decks
Enchantress's Presence 21.5% of decks
Enchantress's Presence 21.5% of decks
Eaten by Piranhas 18.7% of decks
Eaten by Piranhas 18.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Nadier, Agent of the Duskenel // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.62 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 1.12 · 29.9% (32 of 107 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 1.02 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.96 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.96 · 23.4% (25 of 107 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.94 · 21.5% (23 of 107 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.90 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.87 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.86 · 17.8% (19 of 107 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.86 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.84 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Grim Guardian relevance 0.84 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Shimmering Wings relevance 0.84 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.81 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.81 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Doomwake Giant relevance 0.78 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.77 · 26.2% (28 of 107 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.73 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.72 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.68 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.67 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Kasmina's Transmutation relevance 0.67 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.62 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.61 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Herald of the Pantheon relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.59 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Stasis Field relevance 0.57 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.56 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.55 · 15.0% (16 of 107 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 1.02 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.87 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.86 · 17.8% (19 of 107 decks)
- Grim Guardian relevance 0.84 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Doomwake Giant relevance 0.78 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.73 · 15.9% (17 of 107 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.62 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Herald of the Pantheon relevance 0.61 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.59 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Protean Thaumaturge relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
- Balemurk Leech relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
All enchantments (33)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 1.12 · 29.9% (32 of 107 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.96 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.96 · 23.4% (25 of 107 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.94 · 21.5% (23 of 107 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.90 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.86 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Frogify relevance 0.84 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Shimmering Wings relevance 0.84 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 0.81 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.81 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.77 · 26.2% (28 of 107 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.72 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Utter Insignificance relevance 0.68 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Seal of Primordium relevance 0.67 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Kasmina's Transmutation relevance 0.67 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.61 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Honest Work relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Stasis Field relevance 0.57 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.56 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.56 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.55 · 15.0% (16 of 107 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.55 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Whip Silk relevance 0.54 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Lignify relevance 0.53 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Binding the Old Gods relevance 0.51 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.51 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.49 · 16.8% (18 of 107 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.47 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Noggle the Mind relevance 0.45 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.45 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Kaya's Ghostform relevance 0.44 · 14.0% (15 of 107 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.44 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
All instants (2)
- Sudden Spoiling relevance 0.46 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Krosan Grip relevance 0.43 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
All lands (4)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.58 · 28.0% (30 of 107 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.53 · 24.3% (26 of 107 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.45 · 15.0% (16 of 107 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.45 · 33.6% (36 of 107 decks)
EDH data for In Too Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 107 real decks.


































