In Too Deep
Played in 288 Dimir decks
1230+26+4+7+5+3+1+4+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Eloise, Nephalia Sleuth 7.5% of decks
Eloise, Nephalia Sleuth 7.5% of decks
Lazav, Wearer of Faces 6.4% of decks
Lazav, Wearer of Faces 6.4% of decks
Nashi, Searcher in the Dark 3.8% of decks
Nashi, Searcher in the Dark 3.8% of decks
Inquisitor Eisenhorn 2.0% of decks
Inquisitor Eisenhorn 2.0% of decks
Agent of the Iron Throne // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher 16.7% of decks
Agent of the Iron Throne // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher 16.7% of decks
X 2.0% of decks
X 2.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Erdwal Illuminator 30.9% of decks
Erdwal Illuminator 30.9% of decks
Tamiyo's Journal 31.6% of decks
Tamiyo's Journal 31.6% of decks
Five Hundred Year Diary 26.0% of decks
Five Hundred Year Diary 26.0% of decks
Tangletrove Kelp 25.3% of decks
Tangletrove Kelp 25.3% of decks
Piper Wright, Publick Reporter 24.0% of decks
Piper Wright, Publick Reporter 24.0% of decks
Ethereal Investigator 24.7% of decks
Ethereal Investigator 24.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (12)
- Eloise, Nephalia Sleuth relevance 3.05 · 7.5% (52 of 694 decks)
- Lazav, Wearer of Faces relevance 2.80 · 6.4% (43 of 675 decks)
- Nashi, Searcher in the Dark relevance 2.19 · 3.8% (29 of 760 decks)
- Inquisitor Eisenhorn relevance 1.35 · 2.0% (12 of 607 decks)
- Agent of the Iron Throne // Vhal, Candlekeep Researcher relevance 0.64 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
- X relevance 0.58 · 2.0% (2 of 102 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Sivriss, Nightmare Speaker relevance 0.56 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Safana, Calimport Cutthroat relevance 0.54 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- April O'Neil, Live on the Scene // Splinter, the Mentor relevance 0.38 · 2.2% (1 of 45 decks)
- Sharkey, Tyrant of the Shire relevance 0.37 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
- Clan Crafter // Burakos, Party Leader relevance 0.36 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
- Sarevok, Deathbringer // Clan Crafter relevance 0.34 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 1.64 · 30.9% (89 of 288 decks)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 1.61 · 31.6% (91 of 288 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 1.48 · 26.0% (75 of 288 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 1.41 · 25.3% (73 of 288 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 1.31 · 24.0% (69 of 288 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 1.30 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 1.25 · 36.5% (105 of 288 decks)
- Persuasive Interrogators relevance 1.25 · 21.2% (61 of 288 decks)
- Deduce relevance 1.14 · 23.3% (67 of 288 decks)
- Homicide Investigator relevance 1.11 · 17.0% (49 of 288 decks)
- Obsessive Pursuit relevance 1.07 · 22.2% (64 of 288 decks)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 1.05 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 1.03 · 22.2% (64 of 288 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.99 · 16.0% (46 of 288 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.98 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Unshakable Tail relevance 0.98 · 27.4% (79 of 288 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.97 · 16.0% (46 of 288 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.94 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Detective of the Month relevance 0.85 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
- Drag the Canal relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.78 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.77 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.75 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.75 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Nadier's Nightblade relevance 0.75 · 16.0% (46 of 288 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.72 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Disciple of the Vault relevance 0.71 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.71 · 27.8% (80 of 288 decks)
- Secrets of the Key relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (31 of 288 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Erdwal Illuminator relevance 1.64 · 30.9% (89 of 288 decks)
- Tangletrove Kelp relevance 1.41 · 25.3% (73 of 288 decks)
- Piper Wright, Publick Reporter relevance 1.31 · 24.0% (69 of 288 decks)
- Ethereal Investigator relevance 1.30 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 1.25 · 36.5% (105 of 288 decks)
- Persuasive Interrogators relevance 1.25 · 21.2% (61 of 288 decks)
- Homicide Investigator relevance 1.11 · 17.0% (49 of 288 decks)
- Academy Manufactor relevance 0.98 · 24.7% (71 of 288 decks)
- Unshakable Tail relevance 0.98 · 27.4% (79 of 288 decks)
- Martha Jones relevance 0.94 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Detective of the Month relevance 0.85 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
- Nadier's Nightblade relevance 0.75 · 16.0% (46 of 288 decks)
- Senator Peacock relevance 0.72 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Disciple of the Vault relevance 0.71 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Marionette Apprentice relevance 0.69 · 15.3% (44 of 288 decks)
- Lazav, Wearer of Faces relevance 0.68 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.66 · 20.5% (59 of 288 decks)
- Shimmer Dragon relevance 0.65 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
- James, Wandering Dad // Follow Him relevance 0.63 · 10.8% (31 of 288 decks)
- Golbez, Crystal Collector relevance 0.62 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.61 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Sage of Lat-Nam relevance 0.61 · 9.4% (27 of 288 decks)
- Marionette Master relevance 0.61 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.58 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- The Mechanist, Aerial Artisan relevance 0.57 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Eloise, Nephalia Sleuth relevance 0.57 · 11.5% (33 of 288 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Tamiyo's Journal relevance 1.61 · 31.6% (91 of 288 decks)
- Five Hundred Year Diary relevance 1.48 · 26.0% (75 of 288 decks)
- Inspiring Statuary relevance 1.03 · 22.2% (64 of 288 decks)
- Magnifying Glass relevance 0.75 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
All enchantments (7)
- Obsessive Pursuit relevance 1.07 · 22.2% (64 of 288 decks)
- Fleeting Memories relevance 0.99 · 16.0% (46 of 288 decks)
- Curious Inquiry relevance 0.77 · 13.9% (40 of 288 decks)
- Trail of Evidence relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (36 of 288 decks)
- Agent of the Iron Throne relevance 0.69 · 13.5% (39 of 288 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.66 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.59 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
All instants (5)
- Deduce relevance 1.14 · 23.3% (67 of 288 decks)
- Drag the Canal relevance 0.82 · 14.6% (42 of 288 decks)
- Confirm Suspicions relevance 0.75 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.71 · 27.8% (80 of 288 decks)
- Secrets of the Key relevance 0.69 · 10.8% (31 of 288 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Follow the Bodies relevance 1.05 · 16.3% (47 of 288 decks)
- Hard Evidence relevance 0.97 · 16.0% (46 of 288 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.78 · 14.9% (43 of 288 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.68 · 12.8% (37 of 288 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Havengul Laboratory // Havengul Mystery relevance 1.43 · 26.7% (77 of 288 decks)
- Secret Passage relevance 0.97 · 18.8% (54 of 288 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.73 · 20.8% (60 of 288 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.56 · 11.8% (34 of 288 decks)
EDH data for In Too Deep: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 288 real decks.














































