Red Cliffs Armada

Played in 70 decks

Red Cliffs Armada
$11.26 €3.16

Change per day

Commanders

5

Showing 1-5 of 5

Page size
All commanders (5)
  1. Skeleton Ship relevance 2.43 · 1.7% (8 of 481 decks)
  2. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 2.42 · 44.4% (4 of 9 decks)
  3. Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.06 · 1.2% (11 of 913 decks)
  4. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 1.76 · 4.9% (4 of 81 decks)
  5. Jedit Ojanen relevance 0.67 · 2.4% (1 of 41 decks)

Parallel Cards

25

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Wu Warship
    8.15 74.3%
    $1.97 €0.77
  • Steam Frigate
    5.87 52.9%
    $0.25 €0.33
  • Armored Galleon
    5.49 52.9%
    $1.07 €0.69
  • Wu Admiral
    5.10 44.3%
    $2.33 €0.86
  • Zhou Yu, Chief Commander
    5.09 47.1%
    $150.00 €40.85
  • Preemptive Strike
    4.84 47.1%
    $6.30 €0.93
  • Pirate Ship
    4.62 51.4%
    $0.69 €0.28
  • Wu Infantry
    4.47 40.0%
    $2.12 €0.66
  • Merchant Ship
    4.46 42.9%
    $43.78 €32.13
  • Forced Retreat
    4.45 44.3%
    $2.74 €0.54
All most relevant (30)
  1. Wu Warship relevance 8.15 · 74.3% (52 of 70 decks)
  2. Steam Frigate relevance 5.87 · 52.9% (37 of 70 decks)
  3. Armored Galleon relevance 5.49 · 52.9% (37 of 70 decks)
  4. Wu Admiral relevance 5.10 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
  5. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 5.09 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
  6. Preemptive Strike relevance 4.84 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
  7. Pirate Ship relevance 4.62 · 51.4% (36 of 70 decks)
  8. Wu Infantry relevance 4.47 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
  9. Merchant Ship relevance 4.46 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  10. Forced Retreat relevance 4.45 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
  11. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.39 · 45.7% (32 of 70 decks)
  12. Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 4.38 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
  13. Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 4.36 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  14. Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 4.35 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  15. Sage's Knowledge relevance 4.33 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  16. Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 4.33 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
  17. Wu Spy relevance 4.28 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
  18. Counterintelligence relevance 4.21 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  19. Dandân relevance 4.18 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
  20. Champion's Victory relevance 4.14 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
  21. Mystic Denial relevance 4.14 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
  22. Wu Longbowman relevance 4.14 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  23. Broken Dam relevance 4.11 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  24. Reef Pirates relevance 4.10 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  25. Straw Soldiers relevance 4.06 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
  26. Wu Light Cavalry relevance 4.05 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  27. Wu Scout relevance 3.94 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  28. Lady Sun relevance 3.89 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
  29. Lingering Mirage relevance 3.85 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  30. Council of Advisors relevance 3.85 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)

Creatures

35

Showing 1-10 of 35

Page size
  • Wu Warship
    8.15 74.3%
    $1.97 €0.77
  • Steam Frigate
    5.87 52.9%
    $0.25 €0.33
  • Armored Galleon
    5.49 52.9%
    $1.07 €0.69
  • Wu Admiral
    5.10 44.3%
    $2.33 €0.86
  • Zhou Yu, Chief Commander
    5.09 47.1%
    $150.00 €40.85
  • Pirate Ship
    4.62 51.4%
    $0.69 €0.28
  • Wu Infantry
    4.47 40.0%
    $2.12 €0.66
  • Merchant Ship
    4.46 42.9%
    $43.78 €32.13
  • Sun Ce, Young Conquerer
    4.39 45.7%
    $114.40 €33.40
  • Wu Elite Cavalry
    4.38 44.3%
    $2.20 €0.76
All creatures (35)
  1. Wu Warship relevance 8.15 · 74.3% (52 of 70 decks)
  2. Steam Frigate relevance 5.87 · 52.9% (37 of 70 decks)
  3. Armored Galleon relevance 5.49 · 52.9% (37 of 70 decks)
  4. Wu Admiral relevance 5.10 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
  5. Zhou Yu, Chief Commander relevance 5.09 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
  6. Pirate Ship relevance 4.62 · 51.4% (36 of 70 decks)
  7. Wu Infantry relevance 4.47 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
  8. Merchant Ship relevance 4.46 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  9. Sun Ce, Young Conquerer relevance 4.39 · 45.7% (32 of 70 decks)
  10. Wu Elite Cavalry relevance 4.38 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
  11. Lu Su, Wu Advisor relevance 4.36 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  12. Zhuge Jin, Wu Strategist relevance 4.35 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  13. Lu Meng, Wu General relevance 4.33 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
  14. Wu Spy relevance 4.28 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
  15. Dandân relevance 4.18 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
  16. Wu Longbowman relevance 4.14 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  17. Reef Pirates relevance 4.10 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  18. Straw Soldiers relevance 4.06 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
  19. Wu Light Cavalry relevance 4.05 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  20. Wu Scout relevance 3.94 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  21. Lady Sun relevance 3.89 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
  22. Council of Advisors relevance 3.85 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
  23. Saprazzan Outrigger relevance 3.79 · 32.9% (23 of 70 decks)
  24. Ghost Ship relevance 3.60 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)
  25. Deep-Sea Serpent relevance 3.55 · 32.9% (23 of 70 decks)
  26. Sea Monster relevance 3.50 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
  27. Kukemssa Serpent relevance 3.45 · 32.9% (23 of 70 decks)
  28. Sea Serpent relevance 3.29 · 31.4% (22 of 70 decks)
  29. Vodalian Knights relevance 3.24 · 30.0% (21 of 70 decks)
  30. Lu Xun, Scholar General relevance 3.22 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
  31. Hammerhead Shark relevance 3.19 · 32.9% (23 of 70 decks)
  32. Ethereal Whiskergill relevance 3.16 · 28.6% (20 of 70 decks)
  33. Serpent of the Endless Sea relevance 3.09 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
  34. Floodchaser relevance 2.94 · 28.6% (20 of 70 decks)
  35. Dreamwinder relevance 2.93 · 27.1% (19 of 70 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Lingering Mirage
    3.85 41.4%
    $0.35 €0.18
  • Phantasmal Terrain
    3.21 34.3%
    $0.13 €0.05
  • Sea's Claim
    2.84 32.9%
    $0.22 €0.19
All enchantments (3)
  1. Lingering Mirage relevance 3.85 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  2. Phantasmal Terrain relevance 3.21 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
  3. Sea's Claim relevance 2.84 · 32.9% (23 of 70 decks)

Instants

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Preemptive Strike
    4.84 47.1%
    $6.30 €0.93
  • Champion's Victory
    4.14 40.0%
    $10.11 €4.27
  • Mystic Denial
    4.14 40.0%
    $10.72 €3.85
  • Extinguish
    3.75 37.1%
    $0.25 €0.33
All instants (4)
  1. Preemptive Strike relevance 4.84 · 47.1% (33 of 70 decks)
  2. Champion's Victory relevance 4.14 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
  3. Mystic Denial relevance 4.14 · 40.0% (28 of 70 decks)
  4. Extinguish relevance 3.75 · 37.1% (26 of 70 decks)

Sorceries

8

Showing 1-8 of 8

Page size
  • Forced Retreat
    4.45 44.3%
    $2.74 €0.54
  • Sage's Knowledge
    4.33 41.4%
    $3.43 €2.17
  • Counterintelligence
    4.21 41.4%
    $10.49 €5.21
  • Broken Dam
    4.11 42.9%
    $7.97 €2.20
  • Borrowing 100,000 Arrows
    3.40 52.9%
    $0.43 €0.26
  • Brilliant Plan
    3.35 38.6%
    $0.21 €0.13
  • Balance of Power
    3.21 34.3%
    $0.32 €0.28
  • Exhaustion
    2.87 35.7%
    $0.28 €0.32
All sorceries (8)
  1. Forced Retreat relevance 4.45 · 44.3% (31 of 70 decks)
  2. Sage's Knowledge relevance 4.33 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  3. Counterintelligence relevance 4.21 · 41.4% (29 of 70 decks)
  4. Broken Dam relevance 4.11 · 42.9% (30 of 70 decks)
  5. Borrowing 100,000 Arrows relevance 3.40 · 52.9% (37 of 70 decks)
  6. Brilliant Plan relevance 3.35 · 38.6% (27 of 70 decks)
  7. Balance of Power relevance 3.21 · 34.3% (24 of 70 decks)
  8. Exhaustion relevance 2.87 · 35.7% (25 of 70 decks)

EDH data for Red Cliffs Armada: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 70 real decks.