Eye for an Eye
Played in 130 Jeskai decks
430+24+8+4+6+1+3+4+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Donna Noble // The Second Doctor 2.3% of decks
Donna Noble // The Second Doctor 2.3% of decks
Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 11.1% of decks
Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 11.1% of decks
Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 1.4% of decks
Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder 1.4% of decks
Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist 1.0% of decks
Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist 1.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Mogg Maniac 71.5% of decks
Mogg Maniac 71.5% of decks
Boros Fury-Shield 75.4% of decks
Boros Fury-Shield 75.4% of decks
Truefire Captain 69.2% of decks
Truefire Captain 69.2% of decks
Spitemare 68.5% of decks
Spitemare 68.5% of decks
Arcbond 73.1% of decks
Arcbond 73.1% of decks
Boros Reckoner 74.6% of decks
Boros Reckoner 74.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Donna Noble // The Second Doctor relevance 1.35 · 2.3% (6 of 262 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.69 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.42 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist relevance 0.38 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mogg Maniac relevance 4.54 · 71.5% (93 of 130 decks)
- Boros Fury-Shield relevance 4.54 · 75.4% (98 of 130 decks)
- Truefire Captain relevance 4.40 · 69.2% (90 of 130 decks)
- Spitemare relevance 4.27 · 68.5% (89 of 130 decks)
- Arcbond relevance 4.15 · 73.1% (95 of 130 decks)
- Boros Reckoner relevance 4.13 · 74.6% (97 of 130 decks)
- Wrathful Red Dragon relevance 4.01 · 64.6% (84 of 130 decks)
- Blazing Sunsteel relevance 3.94 · 66.2% (86 of 130 decks)
- Phyrexian Vindicator relevance 3.93 · 69.2% (90 of 130 decks)
- Ill-Tempered Loner // Howlpack Avenger relevance 3.88 · 60.0% (78 of 130 decks)
- Pariah relevance 3.85 · 73.1% (95 of 130 decks)
- Selfless Savior relevance 3.83 · 63.1% (82 of 130 decks)
- Comeuppance relevance 3.78 · 87.7% (114 of 130 decks)
- Stuffy Doll relevance 3.76 · 74.6% (97 of 130 decks)
- With Great Power . . . relevance 3.49 · 64.6% (84 of 130 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 3.48 · 76.9% (100 of 130 decks)
- Rem Karolus, Stalwart Slayer relevance 3.41 · 59.2% (77 of 130 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 3.34 · 62.3% (81 of 130 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 3.16 · 66.2% (86 of 130 decks)
- Screaming Nemesis relevance 3.06 · 67.7% (88 of 130 decks)
- New Way Forward relevance 3.04 · 74.6% (97 of 130 decks)
- Deflecting Palm relevance 2.77 · 91.5% (119 of 130 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 2.73 · 60.8% (79 of 130 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 2.72 · 57.7% (75 of 130 decks)
- Deep Gnome Terramancer relevance 2.70 · 60.0% (78 of 130 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 2.61 · 54.6% (71 of 130 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 2.55 · 61.5% (80 of 130 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 2.43 · 63.1% (82 of 130 decks)
- Wand of the Worldsoul relevance 2.41 · 57.7% (75 of 130 decks)
- Caduceus, Staff of Hermes relevance 2.41 · 60.8% (79 of 130 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Mogg Maniac relevance 4.54 · 71.5% (93 of 130 decks)
- Truefire Captain relevance 4.40 · 69.2% (90 of 130 decks)
- Spitemare relevance 4.27 · 68.5% (89 of 130 decks)
- Boros Reckoner relevance 4.13 · 74.6% (97 of 130 decks)
- Wrathful Red Dragon relevance 4.01 · 64.6% (84 of 130 decks)
- Phyrexian Vindicator relevance 3.93 · 69.2% (90 of 130 decks)
- Ill-Tempered Loner // Howlpack Avenger relevance 3.88 · 60.0% (78 of 130 decks)
- Selfless Savior relevance 3.83 · 63.1% (82 of 130 decks)
- Stuffy Doll relevance 3.76 · 74.6% (97 of 130 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 3.48 · 76.9% (100 of 130 decks)
- Rem Karolus, Stalwart Slayer relevance 3.41 · 59.2% (77 of 130 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 3.34 · 62.3% (81 of 130 decks)
- Screaming Nemesis relevance 3.06 · 67.7% (88 of 130 decks)
- Deep Gnome Terramancer relevance 2.70 · 60.0% (78 of 130 decks)
- Enduring Innocence relevance 2.29 · 60.8% (79 of 130 decks)
- Nesting Dovehawk relevance 2.27 · 61.5% (80 of 130 decks)
- Recruiter of the Guard relevance 2.24 · 62.3% (81 of 130 decks)
- Rose Room Treasurer relevance 2.17 · 60.8% (79 of 130 decks)
- Loyal Warhound relevance 2.08 · 58.5% (76 of 130 decks)
- Exalted Sunborn relevance 2.06 · 62.3% (81 of 130 decks)
- Spectacular Spider-Man relevance 2.04 · 60.8% (79 of 130 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 2.01 · 63.1% (82 of 130 decks)
- Selfless Spirit relevance 1.95 · 63.8% (83 of 130 decks)
- Ornithopter of Paradise relevance 1.72 · 62.3% (81 of 130 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Blazing Sunsteel relevance 3.94 · 66.2% (86 of 130 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 2.72 · 57.7% (75 of 130 decks)
- Lotus Bloom relevance 2.61 · 54.6% (71 of 130 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 2.55 · 61.5% (80 of 130 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 2.43 · 63.1% (82 of 130 decks)
- Wand of the Worldsoul relevance 2.41 · 57.7% (75 of 130 decks)
- Caduceus, Staff of Hermes relevance 2.41 · 60.8% (79 of 130 decks)
- Dawnsire, Sunstar Dreadnought relevance 2.18 · 64.6% (84 of 130 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Pariah relevance 3.85 · 73.1% (95 of 130 decks)
- With Great Power . . . relevance 3.49 · 64.6% (84 of 130 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 3.16 · 66.2% (86 of 130 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 2.73 · 60.8% (79 of 130 decks)
All instants (6)
- Boros Fury-Shield relevance 4.54 · 75.4% (98 of 130 decks)
- Arcbond relevance 4.15 · 73.1% (95 of 130 decks)
- Comeuppance relevance 3.78 · 87.7% (114 of 130 decks)
- New Way Forward relevance 3.04 · 74.6% (97 of 130 decks)
- Deflecting Palm relevance 2.77 · 91.5% (119 of 130 decks)
- Rootborn Defenses relevance 2.38 · 62.3% (81 of 130 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Storm of Souls relevance 2.17 · 60.0% (78 of 130 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Maze of Ith relevance 2.47 · 64.6% (84 of 130 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 1.97 · 61.5% (80 of 130 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 1.80 · 59.2% (77 of 130 decks)
All lands (4)
- Lotus Field relevance 3.16 · 58.5% (76 of 130 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 1.88 · 56.9% (74 of 130 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 1.83 · 57.7% (75 of 130 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 1.83 · 56.2% (73 of 130 decks)
EDH data for Eye for an Eye: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 130 real decks.











































