Eye for an Eye
Played in 163 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Piru, the Volatile relevance 3.91 · 7.4% (82 of 1,108 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 1.42 · 7.4% (4 of 54 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.94 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Keleth, Sunmane Familiar relevance 0.65 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Pumpkin Bombs relevance 3.20 · 48.5% (79 of 163 decks)
- Self-Destruct relevance 3.19 · 49.7% (81 of 163 decks)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 3.18 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Coalhauler Swine relevance 3.17 · 49.7% (81 of 163 decks)
- Inspired Insurgent relevance 3.17 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Lich's Mastery relevance 3.13 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Coercive Portal relevance 3.02 · 46.6% (76 of 163 decks)
- Plague Drone relevance 2.95 · 46.6% (76 of 163 decks)
- Harmless Offering relevance 2.86 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Hellish Rebuke relevance 2.85 · 58.9% (96 of 163 decks)
- Pyrohemia relevance 2.80 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
- Blim, Comedic Genius relevance 2.80 · 46.6% (76 of 163 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 2.78 · 81.0% (132 of 163 decks)
- Ashling the Pilgrim relevance 2.75 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Broadside Bombardiers relevance 2.72 · 46.0% (75 of 163 decks)
- Tainted Remedy relevance 2.72 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Contamination relevance 2.66 · 38.7% (63 of 163 decks)
- Repercussion relevance 2.64 · 55.2% (90 of 163 decks)
- Selfless Savior relevance 2.57 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Captive Audience relevance 2.46 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
- Heartless Hidetsugu relevance 2.43 · 48.5% (79 of 163 decks)
- Insurrection relevance 2.25 · 53.4% (87 of 163 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 2.13 · 49.7% (81 of 163 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 2.08 · 49.7% (81 of 163 decks)
- Life Insurance relevance 2.00 · 48.5% (79 of 163 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 1.92 · 53.4% (87 of 163 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 1.66 · 55.2% (90 of 163 decks)
- The Deck of Many Things relevance 1.49 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
- Sanguine Bond relevance 1.28 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
- Comeuppance relevance 1.20 · 34.4% (56 of 163 decks)
All creatures (20)
- Abyssal Persecutor relevance 3.18 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Coalhauler Swine relevance 3.17 · 49.7% (81 of 163 decks)
- Inspired Insurgent relevance 3.17 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Plague Drone relevance 2.95 · 46.6% (76 of 163 decks)
- Blim, Comedic Genius relevance 2.80 · 46.6% (76 of 163 decks)
- Brash Taunter relevance 2.78 · 81.0% (132 of 163 decks)
- Ashling the Pilgrim relevance 2.75 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Broadside Bombardiers relevance 2.72 · 46.0% (75 of 163 decks)
- Selfless Savior relevance 2.57 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Heartless Hidetsugu relevance 2.43 · 48.5% (79 of 163 decks)
- Platinum Angel relevance 2.08 · 49.7% (81 of 163 decks)
- Selfless Spirit relevance 1.20 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
- Stuffy Doll relevance 1.18 · 23.9% (39 of 163 decks)
- Vito, Thorn of the Dusk Rose relevance 1.14 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
- Boros Reckoner relevance 1.09 · 21.5% (35 of 163 decks)
- Spitemare relevance 1.01 · 17.8% (29 of 163 decks)
- Phyrexian Vindicator relevance 0.98 · 18.4% (30 of 163 decks)
- Barbed Servitor relevance 0.94 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Selfless Squire relevance 0.80 · 21.5% (35 of 163 decks)
- Truefire Captain relevance 0.80 · 14.1% (23 of 163 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Pumpkin Bombs relevance 3.20 · 48.5% (79 of 163 decks)
- Coercive Portal relevance 3.02 · 46.6% (76 of 163 decks)
- Wedding Ring relevance 2.13 · 49.7% (81 of 163 decks)
- The Deck of Many Things relevance 1.49 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Lich's Mastery relevance 3.13 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Pyrohemia relevance 2.80 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
- Tainted Remedy relevance 2.72 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Contamination relevance 2.66 · 38.7% (63 of 163 decks)
- Repercussion relevance 2.64 · 55.2% (90 of 163 decks)
- Captive Audience relevance 2.46 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
- Life Insurance relevance 2.00 · 48.5% (79 of 163 decks)
- Descent into Avernus relevance 1.92 · 53.4% (87 of 163 decks)
- Sanguine Bond relevance 1.28 · 47.9% (78 of 163 decks)
All instants (13)
- Self-Destruct relevance 3.19 · 49.7% (81 of 163 decks)
- Hellish Rebuke relevance 2.85 · 58.9% (96 of 163 decks)
- Unexpected Windfall relevance 1.66 · 55.2% (90 of 163 decks)
- Comeuppance relevance 1.20 · 34.4% (56 of 163 decks)
- Arcbond relevance 1.13 · 25.8% (42 of 163 decks)
- Boros Fury-Shield relevance 1.07 · 17.8% (29 of 163 decks)
- Batwing Brume relevance 1.06 · 23.9% (39 of 163 decks)
- Mirror Strike relevance 0.97 · 14.7% (24 of 163 decks)
- Deflecting Palm relevance 0.96 · 36.2% (59 of 163 decks)
- Gideon's Sacrifice relevance 0.95 · 17.8% (29 of 163 decks)
- Delirium relevance 0.82 · 19.0% (31 of 163 decks)
- Reflect Damage relevance 0.79 · 11.7% (19 of 163 decks)
- Backlash relevance 0.79 · 17.2% (28 of 163 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Harmless Offering relevance 2.86 · 47.2% (77 of 163 decks)
- Insurrection relevance 2.25 · 53.4% (87 of 163 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 2.74 · 40.5% (66 of 163 decks)
All lands (1)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 1.80 · 54.6% (89 of 163 decks)
EDH data for Eye for an Eye: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 163 real decks.