Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (10)
- Flubs, the Fool relevance 2.53 · 2.4% (285 of 12,108 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 1.41 · 4.6% (11 of 237 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of the Roil relevance 1.33 · 1.6% (32 of 2,036 decks)
- Zagorka, Mother of Sanctum relevance 1.27 · 2.0% (20 of 1,019 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 1.01 · 11.1% (3 of 27 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.84 · 5.7% (3 of 53 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.70 · 6.9% (2 of 29 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.58 · 2.0% (3 of 153 decks)
- The Tenth Doctor // Jamie McCrimmon relevance 0.43 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.28 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 2.47 · 79.0% (349 of 442 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 2.29 · 50.9% (225 of 442 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 2.12 · 38.0% (168 of 442 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 2.11 · 36.9% (163 of 442 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 2.04 · 41.9% (185 of 442 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 1.97 · 29.9% (132 of 442 decks)
- Drake Haven relevance 1.96 · 33.5% (148 of 442 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.93 · 71.0% (314 of 442 decks)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 1.84 · 30.1% (133 of 442 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 1.81 · 34.6% (153 of 442 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 1.78 · 25.8% (114 of 442 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.77 · 32.4% (143 of 442 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 1.74 · 39.8% (176 of 442 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 1.73 · 28.3% (125 of 442 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 1.71 · 49.5% (219 of 442 decks)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 1.71 · 32.1% (142 of 442 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 1.67 · 33.0% (146 of 442 decks)
- Outpost Siege relevance 1.64 · 29.4% (130 of 442 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 1.63 · 33.0% (146 of 442 decks)
- Aeromoeba relevance 1.63 · 24.7% (109 of 442 decks)
- Aquamoeba relevance 1.63 · 27.1% (120 of 442 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 1.61 · 29.4% (130 of 442 decks)
- Devil's Play relevance 1.60 · 27.8% (123 of 442 decks)
- Patchwork Gnomes relevance 1.57 · 24.0% (106 of 442 decks)
- Commune with Lava relevance 1.56 · 28.1% (124 of 442 decks)
- Noose Constrictor relevance 1.54 · 29.4% (130 of 442 decks)
- Wild Mongrel relevance 1.54 · 26.2% (116 of 442 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 1.53 · 32.1% (142 of 442 decks)
- Ignite the Future relevance 1.52 · 29.0% (128 of 442 decks)
- Conspiracy Theorist relevance 1.51 · 33.5% (148 of 442 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 2.47 · 79.0% (349 of 442 decks)
- Phylath, World Sculptor relevance 2.29 · 50.9% (225 of 442 decks)
- Llanowar Scout relevance 2.12 · 38.0% (168 of 442 decks)
- Scaled Herbalist relevance 2.11 · 36.9% (163 of 442 decks)
- Perennial Behemoth relevance 2.04 · 41.9% (185 of 442 decks)
- Curator of Mysteries relevance 1.97 · 29.9% (132 of 442 decks)
- Tatyova, Benthic Druid relevance 1.93 · 71.0% (314 of 442 decks)
- Prognostic Sphinx relevance 1.78 · 25.8% (114 of 442 decks)
- Skyshroud Ranger relevance 1.77 · 32.4% (143 of 442 decks)
- Geode Rager relevance 1.74 · 39.8% (176 of 442 decks)
- Budoka Gardener // Dokai, Weaver of Life relevance 1.73 · 28.3% (125 of 442 decks)
- Tireless Tracker relevance 1.71 · 49.5% (219 of 442 decks)
- Aeromoeba relevance 1.63 · 24.7% (109 of 442 decks)
- Aquamoeba relevance 1.63 · 27.1% (120 of 442 decks)
- Patchwork Gnomes relevance 1.57 · 24.0% (106 of 442 decks)
- Noose Constrictor relevance 1.54 · 29.4% (130 of 442 decks)
- Wild Mongrel relevance 1.54 · 26.2% (116 of 442 decks)
- Conspiracy Theorist relevance 1.51 · 33.5% (148 of 442 decks)
- Containment Construct relevance 1.51 · 43.4% (192 of 442 decks)
- All-Seeing Arbiter relevance 1.50 · 22.6% (100 of 442 decks)
- Ghostly Pilferer relevance 1.50 · 28.5% (126 of 442 decks)
- Nesting Dragon relevance 1.49 · 44.1% (195 of 442 decks)
- Eruth, Tormented Prophet relevance 1.38 · 43.0% (190 of 442 decks)
- Omnath, Locus of Rage relevance 1.29 · 43.9% (194 of 442 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Seer's Sundial relevance 1.84 · 30.1% (133 of 442 decks)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 1.71 · 32.1% (142 of 442 decks)
- Bag of Holding relevance 1.63 · 33.0% (146 of 442 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 1.43 · 34.6% (153 of 442 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Drake Haven relevance 1.96 · 33.5% (148 of 442 decks)
- Future Sight relevance 1.81 · 34.6% (153 of 442 decks)
- Outpost Siege relevance 1.64 · 29.4% (130 of 442 decks)
- Song of Creation relevance 1.48 · 55.2% (244 of 442 decks)
- Abundance relevance 1.44 · 45.9% (203 of 442 decks)
- Zendikar's Roil relevance 1.42 · 33.0% (146 of 442 decks)
All instants (2)
- Commune with Lava relevance 1.56 · 28.1% (124 of 442 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 1.33 · 29.2% (129 of 442 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 1.67 · 33.0% (146 of 442 decks)
- Aether Gale relevance 1.61 · 29.4% (130 of 442 decks)
- Devil's Play relevance 1.60 · 27.8% (123 of 442 decks)
- Grow from the Ashes relevance 1.53 · 32.1% (142 of 442 decks)
- Ignite the Future relevance 1.52 · 29.0% (128 of 442 decks)
- Summer Bloom relevance 1.51 · 45.7% (202 of 442 decks)
- Edge of Autumn relevance 1.39 · 24.7% (109 of 442 decks)
- Inspired Tinkering relevance 1.39 · 25.1% (111 of 442 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 1.34 · 36.4% (161 of 442 decks)
- Mass Manipulation relevance 1.30 · 23.5% (104 of 442 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Riveteers Overlook relevance 1.44 · 29.2% (129 of 442 decks)
- Blighted Woodland relevance 1.40 · 32.4% (143 of 442 decks)
- Cabaretti Courtyard relevance 1.36 · 28.1% (124 of 442 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 1.32 · 26.2% (116 of 442 decks)
EDH data for Sporemound: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 442 real decks.