Explore the Underdark
Played in 364 Gruul decks
1530+13+4+2+1+16+1+4+9+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Ruby, Daring Tracker 1.2% of decks
Ruby, Daring Tracker 1.2% of decks
Acolyte of Bahamut // Ganax, Astral Hunter 1.0% of decks
Acolyte of Bahamut // Ganax, Astral Hunter 1.0% of decks
Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Hardy Outlander 1.3% of decks
Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Hardy Outlander 1.3% of decks
Skanos Dragonheart // Dragon Cultist 3.3% of decks
Skanos Dragonheart // Dragon Cultist 3.3% of decks
Kraven, Proud Predator 3.2% of decks
Kraven, Proud Predator 3.2% of decks
Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Master Chef 1.9% of decks
Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Master Chef 1.9% of decks
Most Relevant
Circuitous Route 42.0% of decks
Circuitous Route 42.0% of decks
Undermountain Adventurer 18.4% of decks
Undermountain Adventurer 18.4% of decks
Stirring Bard 16.2% of decks
Stirring Bard 16.2% of decks
Loot Dispute 13.2% of decks
Loot Dispute 13.2% of decks
Avenging Hunter 12.9% of decks
Avenging Hunter 12.9% of decks
Explosive Vegetation 25.5% of decks
Explosive Vegetation 25.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (15)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 1.33 · 1.2% (31 of 2,596 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Ganax, Astral Hunter relevance 1.04 · 1.0% (17 of 1,646 decks)
- Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.82 · 1.3% (7 of 548 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Dragon Cultist relevance 0.78 · 3.3% (3 of 90 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.77 · 3.2% (3 of 94 decks)
- Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Master Chef relevance 0.75 · 1.9% (4 of 209 decks)
- Thrakkus the Butcher relevance 0.75 · 1.4% (5 of 345 decks)
- Tahngarth, First Mate relevance 0.73 · 1.1% (6 of 529 decks)
- Tuya Bearclaw relevance 0.65 · 2.0% (3 of 150 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Tavern Brawler relevance 0.64 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Toggo, Goblin Weaponsmith relevance 0.56 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Wyll, Blade of Frontiers // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.42 · 4.3% (1 of 23 decks)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.30 · 1.6% (1 of 61 decks)
- Baeloth Barrityl, Entertainer // Master Chef relevance 0.30 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
- Karlach, Fury of Avernus // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.29 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Circuitous Route relevance 1.52 · 42.0% (153 of 364 decks)
- Undermountain Adventurer relevance 1.09 · 18.4% (67 of 364 decks)
- Stirring Bard relevance 1.03 · 16.2% (59 of 364 decks)
- Loot Dispute relevance 0.86 · 13.2% (48 of 364 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 0.85 · 12.9% (47 of 364 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.80 · 25.5% (93 of 364 decks)
- Caves of Chaos Adventurer relevance 0.77 · 13.2% (48 of 364 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.76 · 12.4% (45 of 364 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.73 · 23.4% (85 of 364 decks)
- Sarevok's Tome relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (42 of 364 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.67 · 17.3% (63 of 364 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.57 · 13.5% (49 of 364 decks)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (43 of 364 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.54 · 14.6% (53 of 364 decks)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (30 of 364 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (50 of 364 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (36 of 364 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.46 · 11.5% (42 of 364 decks)
- Overwhelming Encounter relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (32 of 364 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (24 of 364 decks)
- Emerald Dragon // Dissonant Wave relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (27 of 364 decks)
- Ambitious Dragonborn relevance 0.44 · 7.4% (27 of 364 decks)
- Zalto, Fire Giant Duke relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (23 of 364 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.43 · 10.7% (39 of 364 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.43 · 19.5% (71 of 364 decks)
- Draconic Muralists relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (31 of 364 decks)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.42 · 10.7% (39 of 364 decks)
- Tiamat's Fanatics relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (27 of 364 decks)
- Fang Dragon // Forktail Sweep relevance 0.41 · 6.6% (24 of 364 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 0.41 · 8.0% (29 of 364 decks)
All creatures (13)
- Undermountain Adventurer relevance 1.09 · 18.4% (67 of 364 decks)
- Stirring Bard relevance 1.03 · 16.2% (59 of 364 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 0.85 · 12.9% (47 of 364 decks)
- Caves of Chaos Adventurer relevance 0.77 · 13.2% (48 of 364 decks)
- Gatecreeper Vine relevance 0.45 · 6.6% (24 of 364 decks)
- Emerald Dragon // Dissonant Wave relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (27 of 364 decks)
- Ambitious Dragonborn relevance 0.44 · 7.4% (27 of 364 decks)
- Zalto, Fire Giant Duke relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (23 of 364 decks)
- Draconic Muralists relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (31 of 364 decks)
- Tiamat's Fanatics relevance 0.42 · 7.4% (27 of 364 decks)
- Fang Dragon // Forktail Sweep relevance 0.41 · 6.6% (24 of 364 decks)
- Dread Linnorm // Scale Deflection relevance 0.41 · 8.0% (29 of 364 decks)
- Scaled Nurturer relevance 0.40 · 9.6% (35 of 364 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Sarevok's Tome relevance 0.70 · 11.5% (42 of 364 decks)
- Monster Manual // Zoological Study relevance 0.43 · 10.7% (39 of 364 decks)
- Jade Orb of Dragonkind relevance 0.40 · 9.3% (34 of 364 decks)
- Carnelian Orb of Dragonkind relevance 0.38 · 9.3% (34 of 364 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Loot Dispute relevance 0.86 · 13.2% (48 of 364 decks)
- Encroaching Dragonstorm relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (50 of 364 decks)
All instants (1)
- Jaheira's Respite relevance 0.55 · 11.8% (43 of 364 decks)
All sorceries (16)
- Circuitous Route relevance 1.52 · 42.0% (153 of 364 decks)
- Explosive Vegetation relevance 0.80 · 25.5% (93 of 364 decks)
- Open the Gates relevance 0.76 · 12.4% (45 of 364 decks)
- Migration Path relevance 0.73 · 23.4% (85 of 364 decks)
- Map the Frontier relevance 0.67 · 17.3% (63 of 364 decks)
- Reach the Horizon relevance 0.57 · 13.5% (49 of 364 decks)
- Vastwood Surge relevance 0.54 · 14.6% (53 of 364 decks)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 0.52 · 8.2% (30 of 364 decks)
- Boundless Realms relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (36 of 364 decks)
- Ranger's Path relevance 0.46 · 11.5% (42 of 364 decks)
- Overwhelming Encounter relevance 0.45 · 8.8% (32 of 364 decks)
- Skyshroud Claim relevance 0.43 · 19.5% (71 of 364 decks)
- Escape to the Wilds relevance 0.41 · 14.3% (52 of 364 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.40 · 6.0% (22 of 364 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.39 · 21.2% (77 of 364 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 0.39 · 7.4% (27 of 364 decks)
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Zendikar // Awakened Skyclave relevance 0.42 · 10.7% (39 of 364 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 1.41 · 22.3% (81 of 364 decks)
- Heap Gate relevance 1.29 · 20.6% (75 of 364 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 0.86 · 12.6% (46 of 364 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.62 · 17.3% (63 of 364 decks)
All lands (9)
- Manor Gate relevance 1.48 · 27.2% (99 of 364 decks)
- Gond Gate relevance 1.41 · 22.3% (81 of 364 decks)
- Cliffgate relevance 1.38 · 26.1% (95 of 364 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 1.31 · 20.6% (75 of 364 decks)
- Gateway Plaza relevance 1.04 · 16.8% (61 of 364 decks)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 1.02 · 32.4% (118 of 364 decks)
- Thran Portal relevance 0.88 · 13.5% (49 of 364 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (26 of 364 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.47 · 30.8% (112 of 364 decks)
EDH data for Explore the Underdark: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 364 real decks.



























































