3030+28+4+8+2+2+6+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Maralen, Fae Ascendant 51.3% of decks
Maralen, Fae Ascendant 51.3% of decks
Thranduil, the Elvenking 41.5% of decks
Thranduil, the Elvenking 41.5% of decks
Glarb, Calamity's Augur 20.9% of decks
Glarb, Calamity's Augur 20.9% of decks
Kotis, the Fangkeeper 20.5% of decks
Kotis, the Fangkeeper 20.5% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools 30.2% of decks
Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools 30.2% of decks
Zaxara, the Exemplary 17.5% of decks
Zaxara, the Exemplary 17.5% of decks
Most Relevant
Elvish Mystic 44.4% of decks
Elvish Mystic 44.4% of decks
Formidable Speaker 34.1% of decks
Formidable Speaker 34.1% of decks
Llanowar Elves 53.8% of decks
Llanowar Elves 53.8% of decks
Priest of Titania 33.8% of decks
Priest of Titania 33.8% of decks
High Fae Trickster 32.2% of decks
High Fae Trickster 32.2% of decks
Elves of Deep Shadow 33.9% of decks
Elves of Deep Shadow 33.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Maralen, Fae Ascendant relevance 2.51 · 51.3% (14,087 of 27,437 decks)
- Thranduil, the Elvenking relevance 2.00 · 41.5% (5,371 of 12,947 decks)
- Glarb, Calamity's Augur relevance 1.21 · 20.9% (2,946 of 14,124 decks)
- Kotis, the Fangkeeper relevance 1.13 · 20.5% (1,962 of 9,576 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 1.10 · 30.2% (306 of 1,014 decks)
- Zaxara, the Exemplary relevance 1.02 · 17.5% (2,053 of 11,765 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.95 · 48.8% (40 of 82 decks)
- The Master, Transcendent relevance 0.88 · 19.4% (445 of 2,295 decks)
- Sidisi, Brood Tyrant relevance 0.81 · 16.1% (626 of 3,897 decks)
- Teval, Arbiter of Virtue relevance 0.78 · 16.3% (485 of 2,974 decks)
- Muldrotha, the Gravetide relevance 0.69 · 11.1% (1,502 of 13,529 decks)
- Teval, the Balanced Scale relevance 0.68 · 9.9% (2,754 of 27,952 decks)
- Tasigur, the Golden Fang relevance 0.65 · 13.1% (407 of 3,101 decks)
- The Wise Mothman relevance 0.56 · 8.2% (1,934 of 23,537 decks)
- Uugguu, the Omniplasm relevance 0.56 · 10.2% (522 of 5,097 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.54 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.52 · 16.2% (60 of 371 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Thrasios, Triton Hero relevance 0.50 · 28.6% (14 of 49 decks)
- Zimone and Dina relevance 0.47 · 9.2% (324 of 3,523 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tormod, the Desecrator relevance 0.45 · 18.9% (24 of 127 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.42 · 16.1% (26 of 161 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Armix, Filigree Thrasher relevance 0.37 · 25.0% (8 of 32 decks)
- Volrath, the Shapestealer relevance 0.37 · 8.0% (165 of 2,061 decks)
- Gonti, Canny Acquisitor relevance 0.37 · 6.7% (359 of 5,356 decks)
- Brokkos, Apex of Forever relevance 0.35 · 8.6% (91 of 1,058 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.35 · 15.0% (17 of 113 decks)
- Kadena, Slinking Sorcerer relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (250 of 3,958 decks)
- Xavier Sal, Infested Captain relevance 0.33 · 6.3% (255 of 4,077 decks)
- Damia, Sage of Stone relevance 0.32 · 7.3% (123 of 1,695 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow // Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 0.32 · 6.9% (156 of 2,276 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.79 · 44.4% (17,420 of 39,203 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.78 · 34.1% (13,376 of 39,203 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.78 · 53.8% (21,086 of 39,203 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.76 · 33.8% (13,236 of 39,203 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.75 · 32.2% (12,633 of 39,203 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.74 · 33.9% (13,287 of 39,203 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.71 · 28.7% (11,244 of 39,203 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.70 · 26.3% (10,299 of 39,203 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.69 · 38.0% (14,879 of 39,203 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.69 · 29.2% (11,453 of 39,203 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.69 · 30.2% (11,832 of 39,203 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.69 · 39.3% (15,400 of 39,203 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.67 · 28.9% (11,336 of 39,203 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.65 · 27.9% (10,955 of 39,203 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.65 · 23.9% (9,369 of 39,203 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.63 · 35.7% (13,987 of 39,203 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.63 · 25.8% (10,101 of 39,203 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.62 · 47.2% (18,486 of 39,203 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.62 · 31.4% (12,319 of 39,203 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.61 · 21.1% (8,273 of 39,203 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.61 · 41.6% (16,326 of 39,203 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.60 · 22.5% (8,826 of 39,203 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.59 · 20.0% (7,850 of 39,203 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.59 · 20.1% (7,886 of 39,203 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.58 · 30.2% (11,858 of 39,203 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.58 · 23.1% (9,057 of 39,203 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.57 · 20.8% (8,148 of 39,203 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.57 · 28.6% (11,225 of 39,203 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.57 · 25.3% (9,933 of 39,203 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.57 · 40.1% (15,720 of 39,203 decks)
All creatures (28)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 0.79 · 44.4% (17,420 of 39,203 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.78 · 34.1% (13,376 of 39,203 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.78 · 53.8% (21,086 of 39,203 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 0.76 · 33.8% (13,236 of 39,203 decks)
- High Fae Trickster relevance 0.75 · 32.2% (12,633 of 39,203 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.74 · 33.9% (13,287 of 39,203 decks)
- Faerie Mastermind relevance 0.71 · 28.7% (11,244 of 39,203 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.70 · 26.3% (10,299 of 39,203 decks)
- Deathrite Shaman relevance 0.69 · 38.0% (14,879 of 39,203 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.69 · 29.2% (11,453 of 39,203 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.69 · 30.2% (11,832 of 39,203 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.67 · 28.9% (11,336 of 39,203 decks)
- Lathril, Blade of the Elves relevance 0.65 · 27.9% (10,955 of 39,203 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.63 · 25.8% (10,101 of 39,203 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.62 · 47.2% (18,486 of 39,203 decks)
- Alela, Cunning Conqueror relevance 0.61 · 21.1% (8,273 of 39,203 decks)
- Selfless Safewright relevance 0.60 · 22.5% (8,826 of 39,203 decks)
- Spellstutter Sprite relevance 0.59 · 20.0% (7,850 of 39,203 decks)
- Talion, the Kindly Lord relevance 0.59 · 20.1% (7,886 of 39,203 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.57 · 20.8% (8,148 of 39,203 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.57 · 25.3% (9,933 of 39,203 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.56 · 20.2% (7,922 of 39,203 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.55 · 20.2% (7,933 of 39,203 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 0.55 · 17.9% (7,029 of 39,203 decks)
- Obyra, Dreaming Duelist relevance 0.54 · 19.2% (7,533 of 39,203 decks)
- Glen Elendra Archmage relevance 0.53 · 20.1% (7,894 of 39,203 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.53 · 16.5% (6,449 of 39,203 decks)
- High Perfect Morcant relevance 0.52 · 19.6% (7,692 of 39,203 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.65 · 23.9% (9,369 of 39,203 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.63 · 35.7% (13,987 of 39,203 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.57 · 28.6% (11,225 of 39,203 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.53 · 19.7% (7,728 of 39,203 decks)
All instants (8)
- Swan Song relevance 0.69 · 39.3% (15,400 of 39,203 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.62 · 31.4% (12,319 of 39,203 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.61 · 41.6% (16,326 of 39,203 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 0.58 · 30.2% (11,858 of 39,203 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.57 · 40.1% (15,720 of 39,203 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.55 · 30.2% (11,855 of 39,203 decks)
- Vampiric Tutor relevance 0.54 · 24.3% (9,511 of 39,203 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.53 · 26.9% (10,540 of 39,203 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.58 · 23.1% (9,057 of 39,203 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.56 · 29.0% (11,350 of 39,203 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.66 · 41.5% (16,257 of 39,203 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.63 · 33.1% (12,974 of 39,203 decks)
All lands (6)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.62 · 48.6% (19,044 of 39,203 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.62 · 49.0% (19,202 of 39,203 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.61 · 38.7% (15,175 of 39,203 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.60 · 35.3% (13,846 of 39,203 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.54 · 22.3% (8,761 of 39,203 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.53 · 20.8% (8,170 of 39,203 decks)
EDH data for Bloom Tender: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 39,203 real decks.





























































