Grip of Amnesia
Played in 185 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (4)
- Whtz, the Bibliophile relevance 2.08 · 1.2% (76 of 6,312 decks)
- Niambi, Faithful Healer relevance 0.39 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Ojutai, Soul of Winter relevance 0.33 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Far Traveler relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Confound relevance 1.89 · 38.4% (71 of 185 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.89 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.83 · 27.6% (51 of 185 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.79 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 1.56 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 1.47 · 34.6% (64 of 185 decks)
- Exclude relevance 1.42 · 25.4% (47 of 185 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.42 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.41 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 1.41 · 20.5% (38 of 185 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 1.41 · 22.2% (41 of 185 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.40 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 1.38 · 27.6% (51 of 185 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 1.38 · 41.1% (76 of 185 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 1.37 · 25.4% (47 of 185 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 1.37 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 1.37 · 30.3% (56 of 185 decks)
- Hallowed Moonlight relevance 1.37 · 20.0% (37 of 185 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.37 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 1.36 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 1.35 · 20.0% (37 of 185 decks)
- Bandage relevance 1.35 · 20.0% (37 of 185 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 1.33 · 21.1% (39 of 185 decks)
- Futurist Forge relevance 1.33 · 22.2% (41 of 185 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.32 · 21.1% (39 of 185 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.32 · 32.4% (60 of 185 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.32 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.30 · 18.9% (35 of 185 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.30 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 1.30 · 20.5% (38 of 185 decks)
All creatures (6)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 1.37 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Arcane Investigator relevance 1.27 · 18.9% (35 of 185 decks)
- Galvanic Giant // Storm Reading relevance 1.25 · 18.4% (34 of 185 decks)
- Geyser Leaper relevance 1.25 · 19.5% (36 of 185 decks)
- Glimmer Seeker relevance 1.22 · 17.8% (33 of 185 decks)
- Disruptive Pitmage relevance 1.21 · 17.8% (33 of 185 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Futurist Forge relevance 1.33 · 22.2% (41 of 185 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Declaration of Naught relevance 1.36 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
All instants (39)
- Confound relevance 1.89 · 38.4% (71 of 185 decks)
- Dismiss relevance 1.89 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.83 · 27.6% (51 of 185 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 1.79 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 1.56 · 31.4% (58 of 185 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 1.47 · 34.6% (64 of 185 decks)
- Exclude relevance 1.42 · 25.4% (47 of 185 decks)
- Complicate relevance 1.42 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Censor relevance 1.41 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Dispersal Shield relevance 1.41 · 20.5% (38 of 185 decks)
- Clairvoyance relevance 1.41 · 22.2% (41 of 185 decks)
- Bone to Ash relevance 1.40 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Divert Disaster relevance 1.38 · 27.6% (51 of 185 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 1.38 · 41.1% (76 of 185 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 1.37 · 25.4% (47 of 185 decks)
- Dream Fracture relevance 1.37 · 30.3% (56 of 185 decks)
- Hallowed Moonlight relevance 1.37 · 20.0% (37 of 185 decks)
- Deprive relevance 1.37 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Bandage relevance 1.35 · 20.0% (37 of 185 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 1.33 · 21.1% (39 of 185 decks)
- Change the Equation relevance 1.32 · 21.1% (39 of 185 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 1.32 · 32.4% (60 of 185 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 1.32 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Broken Concentration relevance 1.30 · 18.9% (35 of 185 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.30 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Clash of Wills relevance 1.30 · 20.5% (38 of 185 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 1.29 · 18.9% (35 of 185 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 1.27 · 21.1% (39 of 185 decks)
- Accumulated Knowledge relevance 1.27 · 18.9% (35 of 185 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 1.26 · 18.4% (34 of 185 decks)
- Aura Blast relevance 1.26 · 21.6% (40 of 185 decks)
- Daze relevance 1.26 · 27.0% (50 of 185 decks)
- Intervene relevance 1.24 · 18.4% (34 of 185 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 1.24 · 18.4% (34 of 185 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 1.23 · 23.8% (44 of 185 decks)
- Glacial Grasp relevance 1.23 · 19.5% (36 of 185 decks)
- Calculated Dismissal relevance 1.22 · 20.0% (37 of 185 decks)
- Geistwave relevance 1.22 · 23.2% (43 of 185 decks)
- Ertai's Scorn relevance 1.21 · 21.1% (39 of 185 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Drag Under relevance 1.35 · 20.0% (37 of 185 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 1.26 · 22.2% (41 of 185 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 1.23 · 19.5% (36 of 185 decks)
EDH data for Grip of Amnesia: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 185 real decks.