Grip of Amnesia
Played in 164 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (5)
- Arjun, the Shifting Flame relevance 1.51 · 1.3% (13 of 1,005 decks)
- Ryan Sinclair // The Fifteenth Doctor relevance 0.96 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- The Twelfth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.56 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Popular Entertainer // Alora, Merry Thief relevance 0.38 · 1.1% (1 of 89 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Dragon Cultist relevance 0.37 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Confound relevance 1.02 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.93 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.71 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.67 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.56 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.45 · 32.3% (53 of 164 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Erebor Flamesmith relevance 0.42 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.42 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.42 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.41 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.41 · 32.3% (53 of 164 decks)
- Reach Through Mists relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.38 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.38 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.37 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.36 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.35 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Electrostatic Field relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Visionary relevance 0.35 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.35 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.34 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.34 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
All creatures (11)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.45 · 32.3% (53 of 164 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, the Firemind relevance 0.45 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Erebor Flamesmith relevance 0.42 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.42 · 18.3% (30 of 164 decks)
- Thermo-Alchemist relevance 0.38 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Electrostatic Field relevance 0.35 · 14.6% (24 of 164 decks)
- Niv-Mizzet, Visionary relevance 0.35 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.34 · 22.6% (37 of 164 decks)
- Coruscation Mage relevance 0.34 · 18.9% (31 of 164 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.32 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.32 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.39 · 16.5% (27 of 164 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.35 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Izzet Cluestone relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.38 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.36 · 23.8% (39 of 164 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.33 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
All instants (24)
- Confound relevance 1.02 · 17.1% (28 of 164 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.93 · 19.5% (32 of 164 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.71 · 14.0% (23 of 164 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.67 · 15.2% (25 of 164 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.56 · 13.4% (22 of 164 decks)
- Peek relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (18 of 164 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.44 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Disallow relevance 0.44 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Mana Leak relevance 0.42 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.41 · 10.4% (17 of 164 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.41 · 32.3% (53 of 164 decks)
- Reach Through Mists relevance 0.39 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.38 · 6.7% (11 of 164 decks)
- Obsessive Search relevance 0.37 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.35 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.35 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.34 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Expedite relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.33 · 7.3% (12 of 164 decks)
- Mental Modulation relevance 0.33 · 6.1% (10 of 164 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
- Needle Drop relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
- Quicken relevance 0.32 · 7.9% (13 of 164 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Careful Study relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (14 of 164 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.39 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.37 · 11.6% (19 of 164 decks)
All lands (4)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.43 · 21.3% (35 of 164 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.40 · 30.5% (50 of 164 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.36 · 17.7% (29 of 164 decks)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.34 · 12.2% (20 of 164 decks)
EDH data for Grip of Amnesia: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 164 real decks.