Cards like Essence Flux
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
80% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
63% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
2.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.09 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Essence Flux 75%
- Planar Incision 59%
- Teferi's Time Twist 56%
- Spaceshift 6%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Ghostly Flicker 54%
- Displace 37%
- Illusionist's Stratagem 11%
Cards like Irenicus's Vile Duplication
15× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
20% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Consider
2.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Cards like Flux Channeler
17× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Flux Channeler 37%
- Dreamtide Whale 18%
Cards like Psychic Corrosion
5.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Dimir decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Sol Ring
2.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. 83% of other Dimir decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.90 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 74%
- Mana Vault 14%
- Grim Monolith 5%
- Basalt Monolith 1%
Cards like Deadly Rollick
1.8× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Dimir decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Dimir decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.36 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Will
2.4× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Dimir decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.18 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Force of Will 21%
- Force of Negation 18%
Cards like Time Warp
11× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Swan Song
4.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Dimir decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Swan Song 32%
- Strix Serenade 12%
Cards like Unwinding Clock
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Pongify
1.8× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Dimir decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Pongify 26%
- Rapid Hybridization 18%
Cards like Experimental Augury
5.4× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Experimental Augury 21%
- Dig Through Time 7%
- Impulse 6%
- Telling Time 4%
- Anticipate 1%
Cards like Rhystic Study
1.6× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Dimir decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 9% of other Dimir decks
0.49 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Rhystic Study 30%
- Mystic Remora 19%
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
4.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Other options: Academy Wall, Muse Seeker, Windrider Wizard, Lunar Mystic
Cards like Lotus Petal
5.9× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Dimir decks
Cards
Cards like Preordain
2.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Dimir decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Dimir decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Dimir decks
Cards
- Preordain 37%
- Serum Visions 6%
Other options: Deliberate, Scour All Possibilities, Foresee, Tamiyo's Epiphany, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
1.5× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Dimir decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Dimir decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Aetherize
3.4× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Dimir decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Dimir decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Dimir decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Dimir decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
6.2× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.21 in other Dimir decks
Cards like Displacer Kitten
Over 20× as likely as other Dimir decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Dimir decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Dimir decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Dimir decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.44 · 71.8% (168 of 234 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.43 · 74.8% (175 of 234 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.50 · 56.0% (131 of 234 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.47 · 59.0% (138 of 234 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.55 · 38.5% (90 of 234 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.48 · 49.6% (116 of 234 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.54 · 37.6% (88 of 234 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.45 · 53.0% (124 of 234 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.51 · 37.2% (87 of 234 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.38 · 59.8% (140 of 234 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.46 · 37.2% (87 of 234 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.46 · 36.8% (86 of 234 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.45 · 36.8% (86 of 234 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.38 · 54.3% (127 of 234 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.46 · 27.4% (64 of 234 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.41 · 38.5% (90 of 234 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.47 · 23.9% (56 of 234 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.42 · 32.1% (75 of 234 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.39 · 36.8% (86 of 234 decks)
- Battle of Wits relevance 0.58 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.42 · 23.5% (55 of 234 decks)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.50 · 10.3% (24 of 234 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.41 · 25.2% (59 of 234 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.43 · 18.4% (43 of 234 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.42 · 18.8% (44 of 234 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.41 · 20.5% (48 of 234 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.42 · 17.5% (41 of 234 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (49 of 234 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (49 of 234 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.35 · 35.0% (82 of 234 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 0.49 · 8.1% (19 of 234 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.36 · 29.1% (68 of 234 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.37 · 25.6% (60 of 234 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.45 · 11.1% (26 of 234 decks)
- Release to the Wind relevance 0.45 · 9.0% (21 of 234 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.48 · 6.4% (15 of 234 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.34 · 28.2% (66 of 234 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.36 · 20.1% (47 of 234 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.43 · 9.8% (23 of 234 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.33 · 29.1% (68 of 234 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.28 · 44.4% (104 of 234 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (23 of 234 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.35 · 21.8% (51 of 234 decks)
- Skycoach Conductor // All Aboard relevance 0.45 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.36 · 17.5% (41 of 234 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Spaceshift relevance 0.44 · 6.4% (15 of 234 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.35 · 19.2% (45 of 234 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.34 · 19.7% (46 of 234 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.44 · 71.8% (168 of 234 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.45 · 53.0% (124 of 234 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.46 · 37.2% (87 of 234 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.45 · 36.8% (86 of 234 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.42 · 32.1% (75 of 234 decks)
- Sheoldred, the Apocalypse relevance 0.39 · 36.8% (86 of 234 decks)
- Starfield Vocalist relevance 0.41 · 25.2% (59 of 234 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.43 · 18.4% (43 of 234 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.33 · 29.1% (68 of 234 decks)
- Spark Double relevance 0.28 · 44.4% (104 of 234 decks)
- Surge Conductor relevance 0.45 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Skycoach Conductor // All Aboard relevance 0.45 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.35 · 19.2% (45 of 234 decks)
- Sakashima the Impostor relevance 0.34 · 19.7% (46 of 234 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.32 · 21.8% (51 of 234 decks)
- Y'shtola Rhul relevance 0.34 · 17.1% (40 of 234 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.32 · 20.5% (48 of 234 decks)
- Dour Port-Mage relevance 0.36 · 12.0% (28 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Fox relevance 0.48 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Swarm relevance 0.53 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Servant relevance 0.53 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.33 · 12.8% (30 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Vorrac relevance 0.51 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.37 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Quantum Riddler relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 0.31 · 11.5% (27 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Hydra relevance 0.47 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Condor relevance 0.50 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Dragon relevance 0.46 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.31 · 9.4% (22 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Gnomes relevance 0.49 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Phyrexian Metamorph relevance 0.25 · 24.4% (57 of 234 decks)
- Eluge, the Shoreless Sea relevance 0.36 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Rona, Sheoldred's Faithful relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Trophy Mage relevance 0.34 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- Phantasmal Image relevance 0.29 · 11.1% (26 of 234 decks)
- Auton Soldier relevance 0.28 · 11.5% (27 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Beetle relevance 0.46 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Ertai Resurrected relevance 0.30 · 8.1% (19 of 234 decks)
- Nephalia Smuggler relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- Orcish Bowmasters relevance 0.26 · 13.7% (32 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Steed relevance 0.47 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (16 of 234 decks)
- Clockwork Avian relevance 0.46 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.27 · 10.3% (24 of 234 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.29 · 6.8% (16 of 234 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.28 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- The Watcher in the Water relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.51 · 37.2% (87 of 234 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.38 · 59.8% (140 of 234 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.46 · 27.4% (64 of 234 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.41 · 38.5% (90 of 234 decks)
- Panharmonicon relevance 0.36 · 29.1% (68 of 234 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.36 · 20.1% (47 of 234 decks)
- Urza's Bauble relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (23 of 234 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.35 · 21.8% (51 of 234 decks)
- Mishra's Bauble relevance 0.38 · 12.4% (29 of 234 decks)
- Clock of Omens relevance 0.42 · 6.8% (16 of 234 decks)
- Blood Clock relevance 0.46 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Aetherflux Reservoir relevance 0.37 · 11.1% (26 of 234 decks)
- Black Mage's Rod relevance 0.39 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Time Bomb relevance 0.50 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Armageddon Clock relevance 0.50 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Time Sieve relevance 0.34 · 12.0% (28 of 234 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.29 · 19.2% (45 of 234 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.29 · 18.4% (43 of 234 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.26 · 25.2% (59 of 234 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.28 · 18.4% (43 of 234 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.27 · 20.5% (48 of 234 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (33 of 234 decks)
- Guardian Idol relevance 0.39 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.31 · 9.4% (22 of 234 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.27 · 14.5% (34 of 234 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.31 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Relic of Legends relevance 0.31 · 6.0% (14 of 234 decks)
- Machine God's Effigy relevance 0.31 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Alhammarret's Archive relevance 0.36 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- The Millennium Calendar relevance 0.38 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.24 · 17.5% (41 of 234 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.28 · 9.4% (22 of 234 decks)
- Aether Syphon relevance 0.34 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.30 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.26 · 9.4% (22 of 234 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.28 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.26 · 6.0% (14 of 234 decks)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Lion's Eye Diamond relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (20 of 234 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.28 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.15 · 38.0% (89 of 234 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.24 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 0.25 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Mirrorworks relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- The Soul Stone relevance 0.21 · 6.8% (16 of 234 decks)
- Grindclock relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
All enchantments (48)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.47 · 23.9% (56 of 234 decks)
- Battle of Wits relevance 0.58 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.42 · 23.5% (55 of 234 decks)
- Virtue of Knowledge // Vantress Visions relevance 0.42 · 17.5% (41 of 234 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.43 · 9.8% (23 of 234 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.36 · 17.5% (41 of 234 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.36 · 13.7% (32 of 234 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.38 · 8.1% (19 of 234 decks)
- Teferi's Tutelage relevance 0.35 · 10.7% (25 of 234 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.32 · 12.8% (30 of 234 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (24 of 234 decks)
- Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.37 · 6.8% (16 of 234 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.34 · 8.1% (19 of 234 decks)
- Roll-Roll-Roll-Roll relevance 0.40 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (20 of 234 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.27 · 16.2% (38 of 234 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.31 · 9.0% (21 of 234 decks)
- Unable to Scream relevance 0.32 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.31 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.28 · 9.0% (21 of 234 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.19 · 28.2% (66 of 234 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.29 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.18 · 29.9% (70 of 234 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.19 · 18.8% (44 of 234 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.23 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Jace's Erasure relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Mirror Room // Fractured Realm relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.25 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.19 · 10.7% (25 of 234 decks)
- Copy Artifact relevance 0.28 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Exquisite Blood relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Sanguine Bond relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Gossip's Talent relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Eaten by Piranhas relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.22 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Monastery Siege relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Nowhere to Run relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- No Mercy relevance 0.18 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Virtue of Persistence // Locthwain Scorn relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- The Meathook Massacre relevance 0.15 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.12 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Bloodchief Ascension relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
All instants (50)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.43 · 74.8% (175 of 234 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.50 · 56.0% (131 of 234 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.47 · 59.0% (138 of 234 decks)
- Blur relevance 0.48 · 49.6% (116 of 234 decks)
- Siren's Ruse relevance 0.54 · 37.6% (88 of 234 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.46 · 36.8% (86 of 234 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.38 · 54.3% (127 of 234 decks)
- Hide on the Ceiling relevance 0.41 · 20.5% (48 of 234 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (49 of 234 decks)
- Clockspinning relevance 0.49 · 8.1% (19 of 234 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.37 · 25.6% (60 of 234 decks)
- Illusionist's Stratagem relevance 0.45 · 11.1% (26 of 234 decks)
- Release to the Wind relevance 0.45 · 9.0% (21 of 234 decks)
- Spaceshift relevance 0.44 · 6.4% (15 of 234 decks)
- Waterbender's Restoration relevance 0.41 · 9.4% (22 of 234 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.34 · 20.1% (47 of 234 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.32 · 15.0% (35 of 234 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.24 · 37.6% (88 of 234 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.26 · 32.5% (76 of 234 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.33 · 10.3% (24 of 234 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.25 · 27.8% (65 of 234 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.35 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (29 of 234 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.29 · 11.5% (27 of 234 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.30 · 10.3% (24 of 234 decks)
- Nexus of Fate relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Dismember relevance 0.27 · 13.7% (32 of 234 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.27 · 14.5% (34 of 234 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.31 · 8.1% (19 of 234 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.31 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Time Stop relevance 0.35 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.24 · 20.9% (49 of 234 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.32 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- Bitter Triumph relevance 0.27 · 12.4% (29 of 234 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.24 · 18.4% (43 of 234 decks)
- Not Dead After All relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.21 · 33.3% (78 of 234 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.30 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.30 · 6.0% (14 of 234 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.19 · 39.3% (92 of 234 decks)
- Sheoldred's Edict relevance 0.26 · 10.7% (25 of 234 decks)
- Supernatural Stamina relevance 0.29 · 6.0% (14 of 234 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.25 · 12.4% (29 of 234 decks)
- Stifle relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Impulse relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.21 · 26.5% (62 of 234 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.19 · 33.8% (79 of 234 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.55 · 38.5% (90 of 234 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.42 · 18.8% (44 of 234 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.40 · 20.9% (49 of 234 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.35 · 35.0% (82 of 234 decks)
- Time Spiral relevance 0.48 · 6.4% (15 of 234 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.34 · 28.2% (66 of 234 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.36 · 12.8% (30 of 234 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.27 · 37.2% (87 of 234 decks)
- Temporal Manipulation relevance 0.37 · 9.4% (22 of 234 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.32 · 10.7% (25 of 234 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.22 · 41.9% (98 of 234 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.33 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.26 · 21.8% (51 of 234 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.34 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.30 · 9.8% (23 of 234 decks)
- Flow State relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.29 · 10.7% (25 of 234 decks)
- Thoughtseize relevance 0.32 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.22 · 25.2% (59 of 234 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 0.29 · 6.4% (15 of 234 decks)
- Bloodchief's Thirst relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Drown in Ichor relevance 0.28 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Mathemagics relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.26 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.27 · 6.4% (15 of 234 decks)
- Blasphemous Edict relevance 0.24 · 9.4% (22 of 234 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.17 · 35.0% (82 of 234 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.18 · 22.6% (53 of 234 decks)
- Mind's Desire relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.23 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.24 · 6.4% (15 of 234 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 0.24 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.23 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Inquisition of Kozilek relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.23 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Boomerang Basics relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Time Reversal relevance 0.34 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Capture of Jingzhou relevance 0.27 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Circle of Power relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Cornered by Black Mages relevance 0.26 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (10)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.50 · 10.3% (24 of 234 decks)
- Karn, the Great Creator relevance 0.42 · 6.0% (14 of 234 decks)
- Professor Onyx relevance 0.38 · 9.4% (22 of 234 decks)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.34 · 13.2% (31 of 234 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (19 of 234 decks)
- Vraska, Betrayal's Sting relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Tezzeret, Master of the Bridge relevance 0.29 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.30 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.38 · 20.1% (47 of 234 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.37 · 19.2% (45 of 234 decks)
- Trenzalore Clocktower relevance 0.41 · 6.0% (14 of 234 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.30 · 23.1% (54 of 234 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.33 · 12.4% (29 of 234 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.36 · 7.3% (17 of 234 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.20 · 47.0% (110 of 234 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.27 · 15.4% (36 of 234 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.21 · 36.3% (85 of 234 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.24 · 24.8% (58 of 234 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.21 · 37.6% (88 of 234 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.23 · 24.4% (57 of 234 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.30 · 8.5% (20 of 234 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.29 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.21 · 30.8% (72 of 234 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.20 · 35.0% (82 of 234 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.25 · 12.4% (29 of 234 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (14 of 234 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.20 · 25.2% (59 of 234 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.21 · 17.5% (41 of 234 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.24 · 8.1% (19 of 234 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.25 · 6.0% (14 of 234 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.25 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.22 · 9.4% (22 of 234 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.26 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.23 · 7.7% (18 of 234 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.21 · 9.8% (23 of 234 decks)
- Fetid Pools relevance 0.18 · 15.0% (35 of 234 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.26 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.21 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.14 · 35.5% (83 of 234 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.22 · 3.8% (9 of 234 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 0.24 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.12 · 33.8% (79 of 234 decks)
- Pelakka Predation // Pelakka Caverns relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.17 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.23 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.15 · 9.0% (21 of 234 decks)
- Temple of Deceit relevance 0.12 · 19.2% (45 of 234 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.19 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.19 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Restless Reef relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
All lands (50)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.29 · 14.1% (33 of 234 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.26 · 18.8% (44 of 234 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.26 · 21.4% (50 of 234 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.27 · 15.8% (37 of 234 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.25 · 17.9% (42 of 234 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.25 · 17.5% (41 of 234 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.25 · 15.8% (37 of 234 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.25 · 16.7% (39 of 234 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.22 · 25.2% (59 of 234 decks)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Vault of Whispers relevance 0.26 · 12.8% (30 of 234 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.23 · 19.2% (45 of 234 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.25 · 13.7% (32 of 234 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.17 · 41.9% (98 of 234 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.24 · 10.7% (25 of 234 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.17 · 37.2% (87 of 234 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.15 · 52.6% (123 of 234 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.26 · 5.6% (13 of 234 decks)
- Darkslick Shores relevance 0.20 · 18.4% (43 of 234 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.23 · 8.5% (20 of 234 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.23 · 8.1% (19 of 234 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.14 · 46.2% (108 of 234 decks)
- Sunken Ruins relevance 0.17 · 21.8% (51 of 234 decks)
- Search for Azcanta // Azcanta, the Sunken Ruin relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (24 of 234 decks)
- Mistvault Bridge relevance 0.21 · 6.4% (15 of 234 decks)
- Hidden Lair relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (14 of 234 decks)
- Watery Grave relevance 0.10 · 67.5% (158 of 234 decks)
- Contaminated Aquifer relevance 0.20 · 5.1% (12 of 234 decks)
- Peat Bog relevance 0.28 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.12 · 44.0% (103 of 234 decks)
- Underground River relevance 0.11 · 47.0% (110 of 234 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.17 · 6.4% (15 of 234 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Dimir Aqueduct relevance 0.12 · 21.4% (50 of 234 decks)
- River of Tears relevance 0.16 · 4.7% (11 of 234 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (10 of 234 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.12 · 18.4% (43 of 234 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.08 · 54.3% (127 of 234 decks)
- The Everflowing Well // The Myriad Pools relevance 0.21 · 2.6% (6 of 234 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (16 of 234 decks)
- Maestros Theater relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (5 of 234 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Ice Tunnel relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.17 · 3.4% (8 of 234 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.17 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Darkwater Catacombs relevance 0.10 · 15.8% (37 of 234 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.09 · 24.8% (58 of 234 decks)
- Tainted Isle relevance 0.09 · 20.1% (47 of 234 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Rusko, Clockmaker, from 234 real Commander decks.