Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Shifting Sky relevance 0.73 · 72.3% (102 of 141 decks)
- Sway of Illusion relevance 0.65 · 59.6% (84 of 141 decks)
- Blind Seer relevance 0.76 · 42.6% (60 of 141 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 0.55 · 71.6% (101 of 141 decks)
- Indigo Faerie relevance 0.77 · 35.5% (50 of 141 decks)
- Swirl the Mists relevance 0.73 · 39.0% (55 of 141 decks)
- Sleight of Mind relevance 0.64 · 50.4% (71 of 141 decks)
- Alter Reality relevance 0.56 · 53.9% (76 of 141 decks)
- Sea Kings' Blessing relevance 0.67 · 35.5% (50 of 141 decks)
- Spectral Shift relevance 0.66 · 35.5% (50 of 141 decks)
- Mind Bend relevance 0.57 · 49.6% (70 of 141 decks)
- Scuttlemutt relevance 0.59 · 41.1% (58 of 141 decks)
- Tidal Visionary relevance 0.59 · 39.7% (56 of 141 decks)
- Distorting Lens relevance 0.60 · 39.0% (55 of 141 decks)
- Metathran Transport relevance 0.70 · 19.9% (28 of 141 decks)
- Hibernation relevance 0.59 · 34.0% (48 of 141 decks)
- Douse relevance 0.60 · 33.3% (47 of 141 decks)
- Chill relevance 0.62 · 29.1% (41 of 141 decks)
- Glamerdye relevance 0.51 · 46.8% (66 of 141 decks)
- Fylamarid relevance 0.66 · 19.1% (27 of 141 decks)
- Grindstone relevance 0.45 · 48.9% (69 of 141 decks)
- Insight relevance 0.51 · 31.9% (45 of 141 decks)
- Wrath of Marit Lage relevance 0.56 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Crystal Spray relevance 0.52 · 18.4% (26 of 141 decks)
- Thoughtlace relevance 0.52 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.36 · 51.1% (72 of 141 decks)
- High Seas relevance 0.54 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Quickchange relevance 0.50 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Mana Maze relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Whim of Volrath relevance 0.39 · 35.5% (50 of 141 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.51 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 0.43 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Vodalian Mystic relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Dream Tides relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Hydroblast relevance 0.41 · 19.9% (28 of 141 decks)
- Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.38 · 27.7% (39 of 141 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.31 · 42.6% (60 of 141 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.39 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Trait Doctoring relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (29 of 141 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.33 · 32.6% (46 of 141 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.30 · 41.1% (58 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.44 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Shimmer relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.30 · 31.2% (44 of 141 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.31 · 27.7% (39 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 0.43 · 6.4% (9 of 141 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.30 · 30.5% (43 of 141 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.37 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
Card Stacks
19
Card Stacks
19Showing 1-2 of 19
Cards like Alter Reality
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
61% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
3.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Alter Reality 54%
- Sleight of Mind 50%
- Mind Bend 50%
- Glamerdye 47%
- Whim of Volrath 35%
- Spectral Shift 35%
- Trait Doctoring 21%
- Crystal Spray 18%
- Magical Hack 4%
Other options: Artificial Evolution
Cards like Shifting Sky
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
75% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
36% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Shifting Sky 72%
- Swirl the Mists 39%
Cards like Scuttlemutt
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like Blind Seer
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Blind Seer 43%
- Tidal Visionary 40%
- Vodalian Mystic 11%
Cards like Indigo Faerie
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.74 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Indigo Faerie 35%
- Metathran Transport 20%
- Fylamarid 19%
Cards like Tribute Mage
4.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
0.77 per deck on average
vs. 0.23 in other blue decks
Cards like Blue Elemental Blast
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Blue Elemental Blast 22%
- Hydroblast 20%
- Flash Flood 9%
Cards like Sway of Illusion
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sway of Illusion 60%
- Quickchange 14%
- Prismatic Lace 5%
Cards like Chill
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Cards like Mystical Tutor
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other blue decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.41 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Eerie Procession
Cards like Sea Kings' Blessing
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sea Kings' Blessing 35%
- Thoughtlace 16%
Cards like Mystic Remora
1.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 16% of other blue decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.54 in other blue decks
Cards
- Mystic Remora 44%
- Rhystic Study 35%
Cards like Ghostly Flicker
2.7× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
31% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.41 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Force of Negation
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 11% of other blue decks
0.45 per deck on average
vs. 0.32 in other blue decks
Cards
- Force of Negation 23%
- Force of Will 22%
Cards like Fabricate
2.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 22% of other blue decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
0.56 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Fabricate 47%
- Scour for Scrap 9%
Cards like Douse
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Douse 33%
- Tidal Control 4%
Cards like Archaeomancer
1.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Scrivener
Cards like Sky Diamond
1.6× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other blue decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.26 in other blue decks
Cards
- Sky Diamond 28%
- Coldsteel Heart 4%
- Star Compass 3%
- Prismatic Lens 1%
Other options: Corrupted Grafstone, Guardian Idol, Obsidian Obelisk
Cards like Thassa, Deep-Dwelling
7.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other blue decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Blind Seer relevance 0.76 · 42.6% (60 of 141 decks)
- Painter's Servant relevance 0.55 · 71.6% (101 of 141 decks)
- Indigo Faerie relevance 0.77 · 35.5% (50 of 141 decks)
- Scuttlemutt relevance 0.59 · 41.1% (58 of 141 decks)
- Tidal Visionary relevance 0.59 · 39.7% (56 of 141 decks)
- Metathran Transport relevance 0.70 · 19.9% (28 of 141 decks)
- Fylamarid relevance 0.66 · 19.1% (27 of 141 decks)
- Aboshan, Cephalid Emperor relevance 0.51 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Vodalian Mystic relevance 0.48 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Kira, Great Glass-Spinner relevance 0.38 · 27.7% (39 of 141 decks)
- Tribute Mage relevance 0.31 · 42.6% (60 of 141 decks)
- Thassa, Deep-Dwelling relevance 0.33 · 32.6% (46 of 141 decks)
- Harbinger of the Seas relevance 0.30 · 41.1% (58 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Pathmage relevance 0.44 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Looter relevance 0.43 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Callous Oppressor relevance 0.40 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 0.31 · 27.7% (39 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Sage relevance 0.43 · 6.4% (9 of 141 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.30 · 30.5% (43 of 141 decks)
- Willbreaker relevance 0.37 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Constable relevance 0.36 · 10.6% (15 of 141 decks)
- Fatespinner relevance 0.34 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 0.38 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Inkshrouder relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Retainer relevance 0.39 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Aristocrat relevance 0.39 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Lorthos, the Tidemaker relevance 0.34 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Scout relevance 0.37 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.33 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Defiler of Dreams relevance 0.26 · 22.7% (32 of 141 decks)
- Trinket Mage relevance 0.25 · 27.7% (39 of 141 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.26 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Illusionist relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.32 · 6.4% (9 of 141 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 0.31 · 7.1% (10 of 141 decks)
- Archaeomancer relevance 0.21 · 34.0% (48 of 141 decks)
- Chameleon Spirit relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Master of Waves relevance 0.26 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.21 · 23.4% (33 of 141 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 0.29 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.17 · 45.4% (64 of 141 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.22 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Gilded Drake relevance 0.25 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Displacer Kitten relevance 0.21 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Spellskite relevance 0.20 · 19.9% (28 of 141 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.21 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Callaphe, Beloved of the Sea relevance 0.26 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.20 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Distorting Lens relevance 0.60 · 39.0% (55 of 141 decks)
- Grindstone relevance 0.45 · 48.9% (69 of 141 decks)
- Crystal Shard relevance 0.39 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Kormus Bell relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Erratic Portal relevance 0.34 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Conjurer's Closet relevance 0.26 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Quicksilver Fountain relevance 0.30 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.20 · 34.0% (48 of 141 decks)
- Knowledge Pool relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Ensnaring Bridge relevance 0.27 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Winter Moon relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Kefnet's Monument relevance 0.23 · 10.6% (15 of 141 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.25 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Library of Leng relevance 0.24 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.17 · 28.4% (40 of 141 decks)
- Caged Sun relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.20 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
- Sorcerous Spyglass relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.15 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 26.2% (37 of 141 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.16 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.19 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Extraplanar Lens relevance 0.18 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Coldsteel Heart relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (9 of 141 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.17 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Void Mirror relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.16 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
- Gauntlet of Power relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.16 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Worn Powerstone relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Sword of Fire and Ice relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.12 · 29.1% (41 of 141 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.14 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.14 · 10.6% (15 of 141 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (10 of 141 decks)
- Cursed Totem relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Static Orb relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.12 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Star Compass relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Neurok Stealthsuit relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.07 · 61.7% (87 of 141 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.13 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Winter Orb relevance 0.16 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Shifting Sky relevance 0.73 · 72.3% (102 of 141 decks)
- Swirl the Mists relevance 0.73 · 39.0% (55 of 141 decks)
- Douse relevance 0.60 · 33.3% (47 of 141 decks)
- Chill relevance 0.62 · 29.1% (41 of 141 decks)
- Insight relevance 0.51 · 31.9% (45 of 141 decks)
- Wrath of Marit Lage relevance 0.56 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- High Seas relevance 0.54 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Mana Maze relevance 0.51 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Dream Tides relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Shimmer relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.30 · 31.2% (44 of 141 decks)
- Psychic Allergy relevance 0.40 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Breath of Dreams relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Arcane Laboratory relevance 0.35 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Lifetap relevance 0.38 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Well-Laid Plans relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Zur's Weirding relevance 0.36 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 0.33 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Frozen Aether relevance 0.32 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Tidal Control relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.31 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Telepathy relevance 0.28 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Aboshan's Desire relevance 0.31 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.24 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Equilibrium relevance 0.28 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.15 · 44.0% (62 of 141 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.21 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Think Tank relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Dramatic Accusation relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Land Equilibrium relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Stasis relevance 0.25 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Counterbalance relevance 0.21 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Charmed Sleep relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Kasmina's Transmutation relevance 0.24 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.20 · 7.1% (10 of 141 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.13 · 37.6% (53 of 141 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.13 · 35.5% (50 of 141 decks)
- Extravagant Replication relevance 0.20 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Ringing Strike Mastery relevance 0.26 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Standstill relevance 0.23 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (10 of 141 decks)
- Immobilizing Ink relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Pendrell Mists relevance 0.25 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Homarid Spawning Bed relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Phantasmal Terrain relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Energy Flux relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Dismiss into Dream relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Sway of Illusion relevance 0.65 · 59.6% (84 of 141 decks)
- Sleight of Mind relevance 0.64 · 50.4% (71 of 141 decks)
- Alter Reality relevance 0.56 · 53.9% (76 of 141 decks)
- Sea Kings' Blessing relevance 0.67 · 35.5% (50 of 141 decks)
- Spectral Shift relevance 0.66 · 35.5% (50 of 141 decks)
- Mind Bend relevance 0.57 · 49.6% (70 of 141 decks)
- Hibernation relevance 0.59 · 34.0% (48 of 141 decks)
- Glamerdye relevance 0.51 · 46.8% (66 of 141 decks)
- Crystal Spray relevance 0.52 · 18.4% (26 of 141 decks)
- Thoughtlace relevance 0.52 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Quickchange relevance 0.50 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Whim of Volrath relevance 0.39 · 35.5% (50 of 141 decks)
- Blue Elemental Blast relevance 0.43 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Hydroblast relevance 0.41 · 19.9% (28 of 141 decks)
- Flash Flood relevance 0.39 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Muddle the Mixture relevance 0.21 · 42.6% (60 of 141 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.22 · 30.5% (43 of 141 decks)
- Jaded Response relevance 0.33 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Prismatic Lace relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 0.21 · 17.7% (25 of 141 decks)
- Magical Hack relevance 0.31 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Capsize relevance 0.24 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
- Long-Term Plans relevance 0.24 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Evacuation relevance 0.21 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Displace relevance 0.23 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
- Riptide relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.18 · 22.7% (32 of 141 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.18 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.16 · 27.0% (38 of 141 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.17 · 22.0% (31 of 141 decks)
- Gainsay relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.16 · 24.8% (35 of 141 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.15 · 32.6% (46 of 141 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.11 · 61.0% (86 of 141 decks)
- Plagiarize relevance 0.27 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.16 · 19.1% (27 of 141 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.19 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.18 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.13 · 34.8% (49 of 141 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.13 · 31.9% (45 of 141 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.16 · 12.1% (17 of 141 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.17 · 10.6% (15 of 141 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.14 · 20.6% (29 of 141 decks)
- Blue Sun's Zenith relevance 0.17 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.17 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
- Engulf the Shore relevance 0.18 · 6.4% (9 of 141 decks)
- Gifts Ungiven relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.16 · 8.5% (12 of 141 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.11 · 43.3% (61 of 141 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Wash Out relevance 0.36 · 51.1% (72 of 141 decks)
- Trait Doctoring relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (29 of 141 decks)
- Govern the Guildless relevance 0.38 · 6.4% (9 of 141 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 0.28 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.19 · 46.8% (66 of 141 decks)
- Withering Gaze relevance 0.36 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Merchant Scroll relevance 0.23 · 21.3% (30 of 141 decks)
- Volcanic Eruption relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Paradigm Shift relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Solve the Equation relevance 0.20 · 19.1% (27 of 141 decks)
- Churning Eddy relevance 0.33 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Deep Analysis relevance 0.22 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.22 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Baleful Stare relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.20 · 10.6% (15 of 141 decks)
- Weight of Memory relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Sea God's Scorn relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.16 · 31.2% (44 of 141 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.16 · 25.5% (36 of 141 decks)
- Acid Rain relevance 0.29 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 0.26 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Inundate relevance 0.22 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.14 · 34.0% (48 of 141 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (10 of 141 decks)
- Touch of Invisibility relevance 0.28 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Time Stretch relevance 0.19 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.20 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Tamiyo's Epiphany relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.18 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Self-Reflection relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Recall relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Diminishing Returns relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.20 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Traumatize relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Atlantis Attacks relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.18 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.17 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Treasure Cruise relevance 0.14 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Index relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.14 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Coastal Breach relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Crush of Tentacles relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Braingeyser relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 0.19 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Argivian Restoration relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Time Warp relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Fade Away relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Call to Mind relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Splash Portal relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
Planeswalkers
7
Planeswalkers
7 Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All planeswalkers (7)
- Narset, Parter of Veils relevance 0.21 · 16.3% (23 of 141 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.19 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Jace, the Perfected Mind relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.12 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Jace, the Mind Sculptor relevance 0.13 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.12 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.33 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Homeward Path relevance 0.27 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Maze of Ith relevance 0.24 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.17 · 31.9% (45 of 141 decks)
- Hall of Storm Giants relevance 0.24 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.23 · 6.4% (9 of 141 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (10 of 141 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.18 · 11.3% (16 of 141 decks)
- Halimar Depths relevance 0.18 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.17 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.16 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.17 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.18 · 9.2% (13 of 141 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.16 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.14 · 25.5% (36 of 141 decks)
- Pit of Offerings relevance 0.24 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Wasteland relevance 0.21 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Glacial Chasm relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.14 · 13.5% (19 of 141 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.16 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.17 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Moonring Island relevance 0.23 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Ice Floe relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.14 · 15.6% (22 of 141 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.17 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.15 · 9.9% (14 of 141 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (10 of 141 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.16 · 6.4% (9 of 141 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 53.9% (76 of 141 decks)
- Scrying Sheets relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Dust Bowl relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.12 · 14.2% (20 of 141 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.14 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Sanctum of Eternity relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.13 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.13 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.14 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 40.4% (57 of 141 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.13 · 3.5% (5 of 141 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.14 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.13 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.11 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.10 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.08 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
Lands
17
Lands
17 Showing 1-10 of 17
Page size
All lands (17)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.16 · 17.0% (24 of 141 decks)
- Coral Atoll relevance 0.20 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.17 · 10.6% (15 of 141 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.18 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.17 · 7.8% (11 of 141 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.15 · 5.7% (8 of 141 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.13 · 12.8% (18 of 141 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.15 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.14 · 5.0% (7 of 141 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.13 · 4.3% (6 of 141 decks)
- Svyelunite Temple relevance 0.18 · 2.1% (3 of 141 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.13 · 2.8% (4 of 141 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 85.1% (120 of 141 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Llawan, Cephalid Empress, from 141 real Commander decks.