Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
All top picks (50)
- Stormchaser Drake relevance 0.91 · 76.9% (2,433 of 3,165 decks)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.85 · 68.8% (2,178 of 3,165 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.89 · 62.9% (1,992 of 3,165 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.86 · 64.8% (2,050 of 3,165 decks)
- Spellwild Ouphe relevance 0.94 · 52.9% (1,675 of 3,165 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.86 · 61.2% (1,938 of 3,165 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.85 · 61.7% (1,953 of 3,165 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 0.87 · 58.3% (1,845 of 3,165 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 0.87 · 55.2% (1,747 of 3,165 decks)
- Triton Fortune Hunter relevance 0.94 · 47.7% (1,509 of 3,165 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.83 · 59.8% (1,894 of 3,165 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.72 · 69.8% (2,209 of 3,165 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.91 · 45.1% (1,428 of 3,165 decks)
- Pouncing Shoreshark relevance 0.90 · 45.6% (1,442 of 3,165 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.94 · 41.1% (1,301 of 3,165 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.81 · 55.6% (1,759 of 3,165 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.89 · 45.0% (1,424 of 3,165 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.81 · 53.7% (1,701 of 3,165 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.92 · 41.2% (1,305 of 3,165 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.88 · 43.9% (1,390 of 3,165 decks)
- Sawtusk Demolisher relevance 0.90 · 42.1% (1,332 of 3,165 decks)
- Dreamtail Heron relevance 0.90 · 41.7% (1,320 of 3,165 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.80 · 51.2% (1,620 of 3,165 decks)
- Glowstone Recluse relevance 0.93 · 35.9% (1,135 of 3,165 decks)
- Parcelbeast relevance 0.86 · 43.0% (1,360 of 3,165 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 0.86 · 43.4% (1,375 of 3,165 decks)
- Auspicious Starrix relevance 0.89 · 38.2% (1,208 of 3,165 decks)
- Timber Paladin relevance 0.97 · 28.6% (906 of 3,165 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.94 · 31.6% (999 of 3,165 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.95 · 30.0% (948 of 3,165 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.95 · 29.4% (931 of 3,165 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.92 · 32.8% (1,037 of 3,165 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.92 · 33.3% (1,055 of 3,165 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.88 · 36.6% (1,159 of 3,165 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.78 · 48.2% (1,524 of 3,165 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.89 · 33.7% (1,068 of 3,165 decks)
- Souvenir Snatcher relevance 0.92 · 31.0% (981 of 3,165 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.87 · 35.8% (1,134 of 3,165 decks)
- Trumpeting Gnarr relevance 0.91 · 30.9% (979 of 3,165 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.87 · 35.5% (1,125 of 3,165 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.93 · 28.2% (894 of 3,165 decks)
- Artisan of Forms relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (741 of 3,165 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.88 · 31.8% (1,008 of 3,165 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.90 · 29.2% (924 of 3,165 decks)
- Slippery Bogle relevance 0.91 · 28.3% (896 of 3,165 decks)
- Gnarlback Rhino relevance 0.96 · 22.4% (708 of 3,165 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.68 · 54.4% (1,721 of 3,165 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.68 · 53.5% (1,693 of 3,165 decks)
- Archipelagore relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (725 of 3,165 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.94 · 19.9% (630 of 3,165 decks)
Card Stacks
31
Card Stacks
31Showing 1-2 of 31
Cards like Snake Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
56% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Snake Umbra 61%
- Curiosity 60%
- Keen Sense 41%
- Ophidian Eye 2%
Cards like Stormchaser Drake
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
81% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
51% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Eel Umbra
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
62% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
38% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Eel Umbra 44%
- Lion Umbra 37%
- Spider Umbra 22%
- Boar Umbra 20%
Cards like Combat Research
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Combat Research 65%
- Sixth Sense 33%
- Curious Obsession 12%
Cards like Tyvar's Stand
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Simic decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Tyvar's Stand 39%
- Snakeskin Veil 38%
- Overprotect 16%
- Blossoming Defense 11%
- Ranger's Guile 2%
Other options: Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Setessan Champion
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Sea-Dasher Octopus
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
27% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Edric, Spymaster of Trest, Thieving Otter, Vedalken Heretic, Thieving Magpie, Ohran Viper, Nimble Brigand, Broodbirth Viper, Illvoi Infiltrator, Neurok Commando, Soulknife Spy, Lu Xun, Scholar General, Saltwater Stalwart, Nine-Tail White Fox, Scroll Thief, Gateway Sneak, Stealer of Secrets, Marchesa's Infiltrator, Jhessian Thief
Cards like Slip Through Space
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Insist, Touch of Invisibility
Cards like Tamiyo's Safekeeping
8.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Quasiduplicate
8.7× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Quasiduplicate 21%
- Cackling Counterpart 15%
- Repudiate // Replicate 15%
- Fated Infatuation 5%
- Rally the Galadhrim 4%
- Echocasting Symposium 3%
- See Double 2%
- Spitting Image 1%
Other options: Self-Reflection
Cards like Llanowar Elves
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Simic decks
35% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Llanowar Elves 47%
- Elvish Mystic 35%
- Fyndhorn Elves 20%
- Gyre Engineer 1%
Other options: Orochi Merge-Keeper, Boreal Druid, Druid of the Cowl, Rootrider Faun, Goobbue Gardener, Fyndhorn Elder, Golden Hind, Nantuko Elder, Lifespring Druid, Wirewood Elf, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Irenicus's Vile Duplication
9.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
42% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Simic decks
Cards like Glowstone Recluse
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Rune of Might
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
37% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Rune of Might 30%
- Setessan Training 17%
Cards like Rancor
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Cards like One with Nature
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards like Birds of Paradise
6.0× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 29% of other Simic decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.31 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Birds of Paradise 39%
- Maraleaf Pixie 27%
Cards like Alpha Authority
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.46 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Alpha Authority 32%
- Canopy Cover 14%
Cards like Shielding Plax
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Eternity Snare, Mightstone's Animation
Cards like Counterspell
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 50% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 17% of other Simic decks
0.78 per deck on average
vs. 0.68 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Counterspell 46%
- Negate 27%
- Wash Away 2%
Other options: Essence Scatter, Spell Snare, Stern Scolding, Minor Misstep, Intervene, Wild Unraveling, Envelop, Disruption Protocol, False Summoning, Flash Counter, Second Guess, Remove Soul, Preemptive Strike, Nullify, Extinguish, Mystic Denial, Outwit
Cards like Cartouche of Knowledge
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
21% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.27 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Future Flight, Astral Wingspan, Stratus Walk, Lofty Dreams
Cards like Wild Growth
3.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Wild Growth 20%
- Fertile Ground 6%
- Overgrowth 1%
Other options: Wolfwillow Haven, Shimmerwilds Growth, Glittering Frost, Dawn's Reflection, Verdant Haven, Market Festival, Blighted Burgeoning
Cards like Shore Up
5.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.28 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shore Up 17%
- Magic Damper 4%
- Dive Down 2%
- Octopus Form 2%
- Mizzium Skin 1%
- Glint 1%
Other options: Chase Inspiration, You See a Guard Approach, Shell Shield
Cards like Invisible Stalker
2.9× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Simic decks
Cards like Hydra's Growth
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Hydra's Growth 15%
- Level Up 7%
- Seismic Tutelage 1%
Cards like Gaea's Gift
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Thought Vessel
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 18% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Simic decks
Cards like Ancestral Mask
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Cerulean Wisps
14× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Cerulean Wisps 17%
- Refocus 3%
Cards like Aqueous Form
13× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.57 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Aqueous Form 54%
- Security Bypass 2%
Cards like Pongify
1.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
29% of decks run one or more
vs. 38% of other Simic decks
13% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Simic decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.50 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Pongify 22%
- Rapid Hybridization 20%
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All creatures (50)
- Stormchaser Drake relevance 0.91 · 76.9% (2,433 of 3,165 decks)
- Spellwild Ouphe relevance 0.94 · 52.9% (1,675 of 3,165 decks)
- Gemrazer relevance 0.87 · 58.3% (1,845 of 3,165 decks)
- Migratory Greathorn relevance 0.87 · 55.2% (1,747 of 3,165 decks)
- Triton Fortune Hunter relevance 0.94 · 47.7% (1,509 of 3,165 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.91 · 45.1% (1,428 of 3,165 decks)
- Pouncing Shoreshark relevance 0.90 · 45.6% (1,442 of 3,165 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.81 · 55.6% (1,759 of 3,165 decks)
- Sawtusk Demolisher relevance 0.90 · 42.1% (1,332 of 3,165 decks)
- Dreamtail Heron relevance 0.90 · 41.7% (1,320 of 3,165 decks)
- Glowstone Recluse relevance 0.93 · 35.9% (1,135 of 3,165 decks)
- Parcelbeast relevance 0.86 · 43.0% (1,360 of 3,165 decks)
- Venerated Rotpriest relevance 0.86 · 43.4% (1,375 of 3,165 decks)
- Auspicious Starrix relevance 0.89 · 38.2% (1,208 of 3,165 decks)
- Timber Paladin relevance 0.97 · 28.6% (906 of 3,165 decks)
- Tanglespan Lookout relevance 0.95 · 29.4% (931 of 3,165 decks)
- Sanctum Weaver relevance 0.78 · 48.2% (1,524 of 3,165 decks)
- Eidolon of Blossoms relevance 0.89 · 33.7% (1,068 of 3,165 decks)
- Souvenir Snatcher relevance 0.92 · 31.0% (981 of 3,165 decks)
- Trumpeting Gnarr relevance 0.91 · 30.9% (979 of 3,165 decks)
- Artisan of Forms relevance 0.97 · 23.4% (741 of 3,165 decks)
- Slippery Bogle relevance 0.91 · 28.3% (896 of 3,165 decks)
- Gnarlback Rhino relevance 0.96 · 22.4% (708 of 3,165 decks)
- Archipelagore relevance 0.92 · 22.9% (725 of 3,165 decks)
- Entity Tracker relevance 0.92 · 19.2% (607 of 3,165 decks)
- Errant, Street Artist relevance 0.86 · 25.4% (805 of 3,165 decks)
- Herald of the Pantheon relevance 0.92 · 13.1% (415 of 3,165 decks)
- Pollywog Symbiote relevance 0.92 · 13.1% (415 of 3,165 decks)
- Essence Symbiote relevance 0.95 · 11.4% (362 of 3,165 decks)
- Gladecover Scout relevance 0.95 · 10.7% (340 of 3,165 decks)
- Destiny Spinner relevance 0.80 · 21.5% (680 of 3,165 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.86 · 14.1% (446 of 3,165 decks)
- Orvar, the All-Form relevance 0.82 · 16.9% (534 of 3,165 decks)
- Venomthrope relevance 0.89 · 10.7% (338 of 3,165 decks)
- Eutropia the Twice-Favored relevance 0.91 · 8.7% (275 of 3,165 decks)
- Meletis Astronomer relevance 0.96 · 6.2% (197 of 3,165 decks)
- Invisible Stalker relevance 0.74 · 19.3% (612 of 3,165 decks)
- Aura Gnarlid relevance 0.94 · 6.6% (209 of 3,165 decks)
- Mysterious Egg relevance 0.95 · 5.9% (186 of 3,165 decks)
- Giggling Skitterspike relevance 0.72 · 20.7% (655 of 3,165 decks)
- Verduran Enchantress relevance 0.87 · 7.4% (233 of 3,165 decks)
- Composer of Spring relevance 0.91 · 5.7% (181 of 3,165 decks)
- Protean Thaumaturge relevance 0.89 · 5.5% (174 of 3,165 decks)
- Silhana Ledgewalker relevance 0.84 · 6.8% (214 of 3,165 decks)
- Triton Wavebreaker relevance 0.85 · 5.0% (159 of 3,165 decks)
- Triton Cavalry relevance 0.93 · 4.4% (138 of 3,165 decks)
- Ms. Marvel, Kamala Khan relevance 0.81 · 6.3% (200 of 3,165 decks)
- Maraleaf Pixie relevance 0.57 · 27.3% (864 of 3,165 decks)
- Cold-Eyed Selkie relevance 0.44 · 39.6% (1,254 of 3,165 decks)
- Sage of Hours relevance 0.63 · 8.6% (273 of 3,165 decks)
Artifacts
13
Artifacts
13 Showing 1-10 of 13
All artifacts (13)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.71 · 44.5% (1,410 of 3,165 decks)
- Helm of the Gods relevance 0.92 · 5.7% (181 of 3,165 decks)
- Mirror Box relevance 0.58 · 10.2% (322 of 3,165 decks)
- Helm of the Host relevance 0.47 · 7.6% (240 of 3,165 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.48 · 5.7% (180 of 3,165 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.30 · 17.7% (561 of 3,165 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.25 · 17.5% (555 of 3,165 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.26 · 14.8% (468 of 3,165 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.24 · 19.6% (621 of 3,165 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.34 · 3.4% (107 of 3,165 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.30 · 3.8% (121 of 3,165 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.09 · 51.9% (1,643 of 3,165 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 63.4% (2,006 of 3,165 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All enchantments (50)
- Shielding Plax relevance 0.85 · 68.8% (2,178 of 3,165 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.89 · 62.9% (1,992 of 3,165 decks)
- Combat Research relevance 0.86 · 64.8% (2,050 of 3,165 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.86 · 61.2% (1,938 of 3,165 decks)
- Vesuvan Duplimancy relevance 0.85 · 61.7% (1,953 of 3,165 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.83 · 59.8% (1,894 of 3,165 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.72 · 69.8% (2,209 of 3,165 decks)
- Auramancer's Guise relevance 0.94 · 41.1% (1,301 of 3,165 decks)
- One with Nature relevance 0.89 · 45.0% (1,424 of 3,165 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.81 · 53.7% (1,701 of 3,165 decks)
- Keen Sense relevance 0.92 · 41.2% (1,305 of 3,165 decks)
- Eel Umbra relevance 0.88 · 43.9% (1,390 of 3,165 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.80 · 51.2% (1,620 of 3,165 decks)
- Strong Back relevance 0.94 · 31.6% (999 of 3,165 decks)
- Rune of Might relevance 0.95 · 30.0% (948 of 3,165 decks)
- Sixth Sense relevance 0.92 · 32.8% (1,037 of 3,165 decks)
- Lion Umbra relevance 0.88 · 36.6% (1,159 of 3,165 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.87 · 35.8% (1,134 of 3,165 decks)
- Octopus Umbra relevance 0.93 · 28.2% (894 of 3,165 decks)
- Alpha Authority relevance 0.88 · 31.8% (1,008 of 3,165 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.68 · 54.4% (1,721 of 3,165 decks)
- Boar Umbra relevance 0.94 · 19.9% (630 of 3,165 decks)
- Eldrazi Conscription relevance 0.87 · 26.9% (851 of 3,165 decks)
- Corrupted Conscience relevance 0.89 · 23.9% (755 of 3,165 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.91 · 22.0% (695 of 3,165 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.93 · 17.2% (545 of 3,165 decks)
- Cartouche of Knowledge relevance 0.91 · 17.8% (563 of 3,165 decks)
- Mark of Sakiko relevance 0.95 · 13.8% (438 of 3,165 decks)
- Colossification relevance 0.85 · 20.3% (644 of 3,165 decks)
- Audacity relevance 0.91 · 13.5% (428 of 3,165 decks)
- Enchantress's Presence relevance 0.88 · 14.4% (456 of 3,165 decks)
- Canopy Cover relevance 0.87 · 13.7% (433 of 3,165 decks)
- Sigil of Sleep relevance 0.93 · 10.4% (329 of 3,165 decks)
- Curious Obsession relevance 0.89 · 11.9% (378 of 3,165 decks)
- Vow of Wildness relevance 0.93 · 9.1% (288 of 3,165 decks)
- Traveler's Cloak relevance 0.91 · 9.8% (311 of 3,165 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.85 · 12.2% (387 of 3,165 decks)
- Karametra's Favor relevance 0.92 · 8.9% (281 of 3,165 decks)
- Giant Inheritance relevance 0.92 · 7.8% (246 of 3,165 decks)
- Animal Friend relevance 0.92 · 6.5% (205 of 3,165 decks)
- Favor of the Overbeing relevance 0.82 · 10.6% (337 of 3,165 decks)
- Indomitable Might relevance 0.89 · 6.2% (195 of 3,165 decks)
- Verdant Embrace relevance 0.88 · 6.1% (193 of 3,165 decks)
- Meltstrider's Resolve relevance 0.86 · 6.7% (211 of 3,165 decks)
- Frog Tongue relevance 0.84 · 7.3% (232 of 3,165 decks)
- Hydra's Growth relevance 0.68 · 15.5% (489 of 3,165 decks)
- Ordeal of Nylea relevance 0.75 · 9.7% (307 of 3,165 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.84 · 5.0% (157 of 3,165 decks)
- Curator's Ward relevance 0.81 · 6.7% (213 of 3,165 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.75 · 7.7% (243 of 3,165 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
All instants (50)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.92 · 33.3% (1,055 of 3,165 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.90 · 29.2% (924 of 3,165 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.68 · 53.5% (1,693 of 3,165 decks)
- Viridescent Wisps relevance 0.97 · 11.7% (369 of 3,165 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.76 · 30.4% (963 of 3,165 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.92 · 12.6% (398 of 3,165 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.85 · 17.0% (538 of 3,165 decks)
- Royal Treatment relevance 0.74 · 24.7% (783 of 3,165 decks)
- Tamiyo's Safekeeping relevance 0.58 · 47.1% (1,491 of 3,165 decks)
- Verdant Rebirth relevance 0.92 · 6.8% (216 of 3,165 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.87 · 7.1% (225 of 3,165 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.82 · 8.2% (260 of 3,165 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 0.67 · 15.7% (496 of 3,165 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.74 · 11.2% (355 of 3,165 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.66 · 17.0% (537 of 3,165 decks)
- Poison the Blade relevance 0.89 · 4.7% (149 of 3,165 decks)
- Gift of the Viper relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (445 of 3,165 decks)
- Repudiate // Replicate relevance 0.66 · 14.8% (467 of 3,165 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.51 · 37.7% (1,192 of 3,165 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.76 · 7.4% (233 of 3,165 decks)
- Double Major relevance 0.50 · 35.6% (1,126 of 3,165 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.70 · 9.2% (291 of 3,165 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.47 · 38.6% (1,222 of 3,165 decks)
- Cackling Counterpart relevance 0.59 · 14.9% (472 of 3,165 decks)
- Defend the Rider relevance 0.69 · 7.4% (234 of 3,165 decks)
- Fated Infatuation relevance 0.71 · 5.1% (160 of 3,165 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.79 · 3.9% (122 of 3,165 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.59 · 7.8% (248 of 3,165 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.61 · 4.9% (154 of 3,165 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.49 · 12.5% (395 of 3,165 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.77 · 3.3% (103 of 3,165 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.53 · 8.3% (262 of 3,165 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.51 · 9.8% (310 of 3,165 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.56 · 5.4% (171 of 3,165 decks)
- Swell of Growth relevance 0.78 · 2.9% (92 of 3,165 decks)
- Gold Rush relevance 0.83 · 2.5% (79 of 3,165 decks)
- Aggressive Urge relevance 0.78 · 2.7% (86 of 3,165 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.59 · 4.3% (135 of 3,165 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.45 · 11.9% (378 of 3,165 decks)
- Prishe's Wanderings relevance 0.64 · 3.8% (121 of 3,165 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.62 · 3.8% (121 of 3,165 decks)
- Repulsive Mutation relevance 0.41 · 11.7% (369 of 3,165 decks)
- Refocus relevance 0.67 · 2.6% (81 of 3,165 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.44 · 5.3% (167 of 3,165 decks)
- Strength of Will relevance 0.57 · 2.9% (93 of 3,165 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.28 · 27.3% (864 of 3,165 decks)
- Nature's Claim relevance 0.37 · 6.7% (212 of 3,165 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.35 · 6.9% (217 of 3,165 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.26 · 25.1% (795 of 3,165 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.26 · 21.6% (685 of 3,165 decks)
Sorceries
35
Sorceries
35 Showing 1-10 of 35
All sorceries (35)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.87 · 35.5% (1,125 of 3,165 decks)
- Scale the Heights relevance 0.83 · 28.5% (902 of 3,165 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.75 · 22.4% (710 of 3,165 decks)
- Enter the Unknown relevance 0.78 · 17.4% (551 of 3,165 decks)
- Irenicus's Vile Duplication relevance 0.57 · 38.1% (1,206 of 3,165 decks)
- Quasiduplicate relevance 0.67 · 20.6% (652 of 3,165 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.61 · 17.6% (556 of 3,165 decks)
- Irresistible Prey relevance 0.89 · 4.2% (132 of 3,165 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.76 · 5.9% (187 of 3,165 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.69 · 7.8% (246 of 3,165 decks)
- Stolen Identity relevance 0.71 · 5.2% (166 of 3,165 decks)
- Croaking Counterpart relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (473 of 3,165 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.66 · 6.4% (201 of 3,165 decks)
- Rite of Replication relevance 0.48 · 22.0% (696 of 3,165 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 0.86 · 3.0% (95 of 3,165 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.61 · 4.9% (156 of 3,165 decks)
- Creeping Renaissance relevance 0.70 · 3.0% (95 of 3,165 decks)
- Rootcast Apprenticeship relevance 0.64 · 3.3% (106 of 3,165 decks)
- Rally the Galadhrim relevance 0.59 · 3.8% (121 of 3,165 decks)
- Mirage Mockery relevance 0.69 · 2.7% (85 of 3,165 decks)
- Multiversal Recruitment relevance 0.66 · 2.7% (87 of 3,165 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.56 · 2.7% (85 of 3,165 decks)
- Aggressive Biomancy relevance 0.42 · 4.1% (131 of 3,165 decks)
- Echocasting Symposium relevance 0.48 · 3.2% (100 of 3,165 decks)
- Replication Technique relevance 0.43 · 2.7% (87 of 3,165 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.20 · 27.1% (858 of 3,165 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.21 · 15.9% (503 of 3,165 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.22 · 13.4% (425 of 3,165 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.19 · 23.5% (744 of 3,165 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.17 · 31.1% (985 of 3,165 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.20 · 14.0% (442 of 3,165 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (145 of 3,165 decks)
- Green Sun's Zenith relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (96 of 3,165 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.31 · 2.6% (83 of 3,165 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (84 of 3,165 decks)
Utility Lands
25
Utility Lands
25 Showing 1-10 of 25
All utility lands (25)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.49 · 10.7% (339 of 3,165 decks)
- Littjara Mirrorlake relevance 0.52 · 7.3% (231 of 3,165 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.47 · 11.4% (360 of 3,165 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.43 · 11.4% (361 of 3,165 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.45 · 5.2% (164 of 3,165 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.57 · 3.6% (113 of 3,165 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.37 · 11.4% (362 of 3,165 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.34 · 11.5% (365 of 3,165 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.29 · 20.6% (651 of 3,165 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.26 · 31.1% (983 of 3,165 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.45 · 3.9% (123 of 3,165 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.32 · 11.2% (355 of 3,165 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.28 · 16.0% (505 of 3,165 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (249 of 3,165 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.28 · 15.5% (491 of 3,165 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.40 · 4.2% (132 of 3,165 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.26 · 19.4% (613 of 3,165 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.26 · 19.2% (608 of 3,165 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.28 · 12.8% (405 of 3,165 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (266 of 3,165 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.20 · 29.0% (917 of 3,165 decks)
- Rain-Slicked Copse relevance 0.30 · 4.6% (147 of 3,165 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.26 · 6.3% (198 of 3,165 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.15 · 45.7% (1,445 of 3,165 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.22 · 4.9% (156 of 3,165 decks)
Lands
38
Lands
38 Showing 1-10 of 38
All lands (38)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.34 · 16.1% (511 of 3,165 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.30 · 25.8% (818 of 3,165 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.29 · 22.3% (706 of 3,165 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.31 · 14.4% (455 of 3,165 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.37 · 5.0% (158 of 3,165 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.24 · 30.8% (975 of 3,165 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (139 of 3,165 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.30 · 10.7% (339 of 3,165 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (122 of 3,165 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.25 · 19.8% (628 of 3,165 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.26 · 17.6% (558 of 3,165 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.29 · 9.7% (308 of 3,165 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.26 · 14.5% (460 of 3,165 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.31 · 5.8% (185 of 3,165 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (155 of 3,165 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.32 · 5.0% (159 of 3,165 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.31 · 5.5% (173 of 3,165 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.30 · 5.7% (181 of 3,165 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.22 · 24.9% (788 of 3,165 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.18 · 43.3% (1,372 of 3,165 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.18 · 43.5% (1,377 of 3,165 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.16 · 55.5% (1,755 of 3,165 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.32 · 4.6% (145 of 3,165 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (132 of 3,165 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.25 · 10.5% (331 of 3,165 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.16 · 46.9% (1,484 of 3,165 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.24 · 10.6% (337 of 3,165 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.40 · 2.7% (85 of 3,165 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.18 · 34.0% (1,075 of 3,165 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.13 · 55.5% (1,755 of 3,165 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.28 · 4.4% (138 of 3,165 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.14 · 43.8% (1,386 of 3,165 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.33 · 2.6% (81 of 3,165 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.10 · 66.4% (2,100 of 3,165 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.32 · 2.6% (83 of 3,165 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.04 · 80.0% (2,531 of 3,165 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.02 · 91.2% (2,887 of 3,165 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 91.1% (2,883 of 3,165 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Ivy, Gleeful Spellthief, from 3,165 real Commander decks.